Assessing 30 years of Westminster policy advisory system experience

John HALLIGAN, Jonathan Craft

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    23 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    With the 30th anniversary of the policy advisory systems concept on the horizon, it is an appropriate time to reflect further on the concept’s utility, particularly in helping to understand the dynamics of system change and their implications for policy-making. This article provides diachronic analysis of the policy advisory systems in the classic Anglo-Saxon ‘Westminster’ family (Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand). Analysis focuses on five advisory units: the public service and central agencies, partisan ministerial advisers, external consultants, commissions of inquiry, and select special advisory bodies. The principle research aim is to compare these cases to shed light on advisory system dynamics through identification and analysis of shared and country-specific patterns of PAS change. We argue that the leading dynamics of politicization and externalization often used to characterize how advisory systems change masks idiosyncratic country patterns. We argue that differences in the tempo, intensity, and sequencing of advisory unit (de)institutionalization are clear in these cases and that attention to these dimensions of advisory system change add precision to understanding the organization, operation, and evolution of these systems.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)47-62
    Number of pages16
    JournalPolicy Sciences
    Volume50
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    system change
    experience
    public service
    policy making
    politicization
    anniversary
    institutionalization
    New Zealand
    Canada
    organization
    policy
    analysis
    family
    institutionalisation

    Cite this

    HALLIGAN, John ; Craft, Jonathan. / Assessing 30 years of Westminster policy advisory system experience. In: Policy Sciences. 2017 ; Vol. 50, No. 1. pp. 47-62.
    @article{bc0e94a5d4c64b8da2d294f52bc0b109,
    title = "Assessing 30 years of Westminster policy advisory system experience",
    abstract = "With the 30th anniversary of the policy advisory systems concept on the horizon, it is an appropriate time to reflect further on the concept’s utility, particularly in helping to understand the dynamics of system change and their implications for policy-making. This article provides diachronic analysis of the policy advisory systems in the classic Anglo-Saxon ‘Westminster’ family (Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand). Analysis focuses on five advisory units: the public service and central agencies, partisan ministerial advisers, external consultants, commissions of inquiry, and select special advisory bodies. The principle research aim is to compare these cases to shed light on advisory system dynamics through identification and analysis of shared and country-specific patterns of PAS change. We argue that the leading dynamics of politicization and externalization often used to characterize how advisory systems change masks idiosyncratic country patterns. We argue that differences in the tempo, intensity, and sequencing of advisory unit (de)institutionalization are clear in these cases and that attention to these dimensions of advisory system change add precision to understanding the organization, operation, and evolution of these systems.",
    keywords = "Policy advisory systems – Policy dynamics – Anglophone countries – Administrative tradition – Politicization – Externalization – Deinstitutionalization",
    author = "John HALLIGAN and Jonathan Craft",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1007/s11077-016-9256-y",
    language = "English",
    volume = "50",
    pages = "47--62",
    journal = "Policy Sciences",
    issn = "0032-2687",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "1",

    }

    Assessing 30 years of Westminster policy advisory system experience. / HALLIGAN, John; Craft, Jonathan.

    In: Policy Sciences, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2017, p. 47-62.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Assessing 30 years of Westminster policy advisory system experience

    AU - HALLIGAN, John

    AU - Craft, Jonathan

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - With the 30th anniversary of the policy advisory systems concept on the horizon, it is an appropriate time to reflect further on the concept’s utility, particularly in helping to understand the dynamics of system change and their implications for policy-making. This article provides diachronic analysis of the policy advisory systems in the classic Anglo-Saxon ‘Westminster’ family (Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand). Analysis focuses on five advisory units: the public service and central agencies, partisan ministerial advisers, external consultants, commissions of inquiry, and select special advisory bodies. The principle research aim is to compare these cases to shed light on advisory system dynamics through identification and analysis of shared and country-specific patterns of PAS change. We argue that the leading dynamics of politicization and externalization often used to characterize how advisory systems change masks idiosyncratic country patterns. We argue that differences in the tempo, intensity, and sequencing of advisory unit (de)institutionalization are clear in these cases and that attention to these dimensions of advisory system change add precision to understanding the organization, operation, and evolution of these systems.

    AB - With the 30th anniversary of the policy advisory systems concept on the horizon, it is an appropriate time to reflect further on the concept’s utility, particularly in helping to understand the dynamics of system change and their implications for policy-making. This article provides diachronic analysis of the policy advisory systems in the classic Anglo-Saxon ‘Westminster’ family (Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand). Analysis focuses on five advisory units: the public service and central agencies, partisan ministerial advisers, external consultants, commissions of inquiry, and select special advisory bodies. The principle research aim is to compare these cases to shed light on advisory system dynamics through identification and analysis of shared and country-specific patterns of PAS change. We argue that the leading dynamics of politicization and externalization often used to characterize how advisory systems change masks idiosyncratic country patterns. We argue that differences in the tempo, intensity, and sequencing of advisory unit (de)institutionalization are clear in these cases and that attention to these dimensions of advisory system change add precision to understanding the organization, operation, and evolution of these systems.

    KW - Policy advisory systems – Policy dynamics – Anglophone countries – Administrative tradition – Politicization – Externalization – Deinstitutionalization

    U2 - 10.1007/s11077-016-9256-y

    DO - 10.1007/s11077-016-9256-y

    M3 - Article

    VL - 50

    SP - 47

    EP - 62

    JO - Policy Sciences

    JF - Policy Sciences

    SN - 0032-2687

    IS - 1

    ER -