Assessing possible selection bias in a national voluntary MS longitudinal study in Australia

Bruce V. Taylor, Andrew Palmer, Steve Simpson, Robyn Lucas, Rex D. Simmons, Deborah Mason, John Pearson, Glynnis Clarke, Clive Sabel, Ernie Willoughby, Anne Richardson, David Abernethy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Citations (Scopus)


Background: Surveying volunteer members of a multiple sclerosis registry is a very cost-effective way of assessing the impact of the disease on life outcomes. However, whether the data from such a study can be generalised to the whole population of persons living with MS in a country or region is unclear. Methods: Here we compare the demographic and disease characteristics of participants in one such study, the Australian Multiple Sclerosis Longitudinal Study (AMSLS), with two well-characterised MS prevalence studies with near-complete ascertainment of MS in their study regions. Results: Although some differences were found, these largely represented the effects of geography (sex ratios) and local factors (national immunomodulatory therapy prescribing requirements), and the cohorts were otherwise comparable. Overall, despite comprising only 12-16% of MS cases in Australia, the AMSLS is highly representative of the MS population. Conclusions: Therefore with some minor caveats, the AMSLS data can be generalised to the whole Australasian MS population. Volunteer disease registries such as this can be highly representative and provide an excellent convenience sample when studying rare conditions such as MS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1627-1631
Number of pages5
JournalMultiple Sclerosis Journal
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2013
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing possible selection bias in a national voluntary MS longitudinal study in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this