Assessing the benefits of participatory research: A rationale for a realist review

Ann Macaulay, Justin Jagosh, Robbyn Seller, James Henderson, Margaret CARGO, Trisha Greenhalgh, Geoff Wong, Jon Salsberg, Lawrence Green, Carol Herbert, Pierre Pluye

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    27 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Participatory research (PR) experts believe that increased community and stakeholder participation in research augments program pertinence, quality, outcome, sustainability, uptake, and transferability. There is, however, a dearth of assessments and measurement tools to demonstrate the contribution of participation in health research and interventions. One systematic review of PR, conducted for the Agency for Health Research and Quality (AHRQ), provided no conclusive evidence concerning the benefits of community participation to enhance research and health outcomes. To overcome methodological gaps and barriers of the AHRQ review, we propose to conduct a systematic realist review, which can be understood as a theory-driven qualitative review capable of capturing the often complex, diffuse and obtuse evidence concerning participation. Reviewing how PR mechanisms and contextual factors mediate and moderate outcomes, the review will generate and test hypotheses (middle-range theories) conceptualizing the benefits of participation and will portray the manner and circumstances in which participation influences outcomes.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)45-48
    Number of pages4
    JournalGlobal Health Promotion
    Volume18
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Research
    Health
    Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
    Community Participation

    Cite this

    Macaulay, A., Jagosh, J., Seller, R., Henderson, J., CARGO, M., Greenhalgh, T., ... Pluye, P. (2011). Assessing the benefits of participatory research: A rationale for a realist review. Global Health Promotion, 18(2), 45-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975910383936
    Macaulay, Ann ; Jagosh, Justin ; Seller, Robbyn ; Henderson, James ; CARGO, Margaret ; Greenhalgh, Trisha ; Wong, Geoff ; Salsberg, Jon ; Green, Lawrence ; Herbert, Carol ; Pluye, Pierre. / Assessing the benefits of participatory research: A rationale for a realist review. In: Global Health Promotion. 2011 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 45-48.
    @article{6398ab1b8a5e4c86899dc5c20812ac06,
    title = "Assessing the benefits of participatory research: A rationale for a realist review",
    abstract = "Participatory research (PR) experts believe that increased community and stakeholder participation in research augments program pertinence, quality, outcome, sustainability, uptake, and transferability. There is, however, a dearth of assessments and measurement tools to demonstrate the contribution of participation in health research and interventions. One systematic review of PR, conducted for the Agency for Health Research and Quality (AHRQ), provided no conclusive evidence concerning the benefits of community participation to enhance research and health outcomes. To overcome methodological gaps and barriers of the AHRQ review, we propose to conduct a systematic realist review, which can be understood as a theory-driven qualitative review capable of capturing the often complex, diffuse and obtuse evidence concerning participation. Reviewing how PR mechanisms and contextual factors mediate and moderate outcomes, the review will generate and test hypotheses (middle-range theories) conceptualizing the benefits of participation and will portray the manner and circumstances in which participation influences outcomes.",
    author = "Ann Macaulay and Justin Jagosh and Robbyn Seller and James Henderson and Margaret CARGO and Trisha Greenhalgh and Geoff Wong and Jon Salsberg and Lawrence Green and Carol Herbert and Pierre Pluye",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1177/1757975910383936",
    language = "English",
    volume = "18",
    pages = "45--48",
    journal = "Promotion & education",
    issn = "1025-3823",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "2",

    }

    Macaulay, A, Jagosh, J, Seller, R, Henderson, J, CARGO, M, Greenhalgh, T, Wong, G, Salsberg, J, Green, L, Herbert, C & Pluye, P 2011, 'Assessing the benefits of participatory research: A rationale for a realist review', Global Health Promotion, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 45-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975910383936

    Assessing the benefits of participatory research: A rationale for a realist review. / Macaulay, Ann; Jagosh, Justin; Seller, Robbyn; Henderson, James; CARGO, Margaret; Greenhalgh, Trisha; Wong, Geoff; Salsberg, Jon; Green, Lawrence; Herbert, Carol; Pluye, Pierre.

    In: Global Health Promotion, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2011, p. 45-48.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Assessing the benefits of participatory research: A rationale for a realist review

    AU - Macaulay, Ann

    AU - Jagosh, Justin

    AU - Seller, Robbyn

    AU - Henderson, James

    AU - CARGO, Margaret

    AU - Greenhalgh, Trisha

    AU - Wong, Geoff

    AU - Salsberg, Jon

    AU - Green, Lawrence

    AU - Herbert, Carol

    AU - Pluye, Pierre

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Participatory research (PR) experts believe that increased community and stakeholder participation in research augments program pertinence, quality, outcome, sustainability, uptake, and transferability. There is, however, a dearth of assessments and measurement tools to demonstrate the contribution of participation in health research and interventions. One systematic review of PR, conducted for the Agency for Health Research and Quality (AHRQ), provided no conclusive evidence concerning the benefits of community participation to enhance research and health outcomes. To overcome methodological gaps and barriers of the AHRQ review, we propose to conduct a systematic realist review, which can be understood as a theory-driven qualitative review capable of capturing the often complex, diffuse and obtuse evidence concerning participation. Reviewing how PR mechanisms and contextual factors mediate and moderate outcomes, the review will generate and test hypotheses (middle-range theories) conceptualizing the benefits of participation and will portray the manner and circumstances in which participation influences outcomes.

    AB - Participatory research (PR) experts believe that increased community and stakeholder participation in research augments program pertinence, quality, outcome, sustainability, uptake, and transferability. There is, however, a dearth of assessments and measurement tools to demonstrate the contribution of participation in health research and interventions. One systematic review of PR, conducted for the Agency for Health Research and Quality (AHRQ), provided no conclusive evidence concerning the benefits of community participation to enhance research and health outcomes. To overcome methodological gaps and barriers of the AHRQ review, we propose to conduct a systematic realist review, which can be understood as a theory-driven qualitative review capable of capturing the often complex, diffuse and obtuse evidence concerning participation. Reviewing how PR mechanisms and contextual factors mediate and moderate outcomes, the review will generate and test hypotheses (middle-range theories) conceptualizing the benefits of participation and will portray the manner and circumstances in which participation influences outcomes.

    U2 - 10.1177/1757975910383936

    DO - 10.1177/1757975910383936

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 18

    SP - 45

    EP - 48

    JO - Promotion & education

    JF - Promotion & education

    SN - 1025-3823

    IS - 2

    ER -