Assessing the likelihood of widespread landholder adoption of afforestation and reforestation projects

Jacki SCHIRMER, Lyndall Bull

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    29 Citations (Scopus)
    4 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Tree planting for carbon sequestration is a commonly proposed climate change mitigation strategy, with afforestation projects forming part of voluntary and mandatory carbon offset trading schemes. Afforestation is often promoted as a new economic opportunity for private landholders. While multiple studies have identified physical and economic opportunities for afforestation, few have examined the willingness of private landholders to adopt afforestation, and the factors that influence this willingness. We examine this using data from a survey of Australian landholders. The willingness of landholders to adopt afforestation for carbon sequestration varies substantially depending on how this afforestation is designed and implemented: landholders prefer small plantings on less productive land, which minimise the disturbance afforestation presents to land management, and to landholder values about appropriate uses of agricultural land. Landholders are less willing to consider afforestation if it involves planting the large areas required by many current carbon afforestation schemes. Willingness to adopt afforestation is influenced in particular by landholder's perceptions of its potential to provide a diversified income stream, and its impacts on flexibility of land management. More broadly, it is influenced by their views about the social acceptability of afforestation, particularly whether the landholder believes trees should be planted on agricultural land, and how they believe others in the community view afforestation. Our results suggest that widespread adoption requires designing afforestation so it (i) provides a range of socio-economic benefits that go beyond provision of income; (ii) minimises disruption to land management flexibility; and (iii) is compatible with landholder beliefs about appropriate use of agricultural land.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)306-320
    Number of pages15
    JournalGlobal Environmental Change
    Volume24
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    reforestation
    afforestation
    flexibility
    required area
    land management
    management
    economics
    income
    agricultural land
    project
    carbon sequestration
    climate change
    tree planting
    carbon
    community
    Values

    Cite this

    @article{4fe407df768d4e51aeb3dee0804dde66,
    title = "Assessing the likelihood of widespread landholder adoption of afforestation and reforestation projects",
    abstract = "Tree planting for carbon sequestration is a commonly proposed climate change mitigation strategy, with afforestation projects forming part of voluntary and mandatory carbon offset trading schemes. Afforestation is often promoted as a new economic opportunity for private landholders. While multiple studies have identified physical and economic opportunities for afforestation, few have examined the willingness of private landholders to adopt afforestation, and the factors that influence this willingness. We examine this using data from a survey of Australian landholders. The willingness of landholders to adopt afforestation for carbon sequestration varies substantially depending on how this afforestation is designed and implemented: landholders prefer small plantings on less productive land, which minimise the disturbance afforestation presents to land management, and to landholder values about appropriate uses of agricultural land. Landholders are less willing to consider afforestation if it involves planting the large areas required by many current carbon afforestation schemes. Willingness to adopt afforestation is influenced in particular by landholder's perceptions of its potential to provide a diversified income stream, and its impacts on flexibility of land management. More broadly, it is influenced by their views about the social acceptability of afforestation, particularly whether the landholder believes trees should be planted on agricultural land, and how they believe others in the community view afforestation. Our results suggest that widespread adoption requires designing afforestation so it (i) provides a range of socio-economic benefits that go beyond provision of income; (ii) minimises disruption to land management flexibility; and (iii) is compatible with landholder beliefs about appropriate use of agricultural land.",
    keywords = "Adoption, Afforestation, Carbon sequestration, Mitigation, Reforestation",
    author = "Jacki SCHIRMER and Lyndall Bull",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.009",
    language = "English",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "306--320",
    journal = "Global Environmental Change",
    issn = "0959-3780",
    publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
    number = "1",

    }

    Assessing the likelihood of widespread landholder adoption of afforestation and reforestation projects. / SCHIRMER, Jacki; Bull, Lyndall.

    In: Global Environmental Change, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2014, p. 306-320.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Assessing the likelihood of widespread landholder adoption of afforestation and reforestation projects

    AU - SCHIRMER, Jacki

    AU - Bull, Lyndall

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Tree planting for carbon sequestration is a commonly proposed climate change mitigation strategy, with afforestation projects forming part of voluntary and mandatory carbon offset trading schemes. Afforestation is often promoted as a new economic opportunity for private landholders. While multiple studies have identified physical and economic opportunities for afforestation, few have examined the willingness of private landholders to adopt afforestation, and the factors that influence this willingness. We examine this using data from a survey of Australian landholders. The willingness of landholders to adopt afforestation for carbon sequestration varies substantially depending on how this afforestation is designed and implemented: landholders prefer small plantings on less productive land, which minimise the disturbance afforestation presents to land management, and to landholder values about appropriate uses of agricultural land. Landholders are less willing to consider afforestation if it involves planting the large areas required by many current carbon afforestation schemes. Willingness to adopt afforestation is influenced in particular by landholder's perceptions of its potential to provide a diversified income stream, and its impacts on flexibility of land management. More broadly, it is influenced by their views about the social acceptability of afforestation, particularly whether the landholder believes trees should be planted on agricultural land, and how they believe others in the community view afforestation. Our results suggest that widespread adoption requires designing afforestation so it (i) provides a range of socio-economic benefits that go beyond provision of income; (ii) minimises disruption to land management flexibility; and (iii) is compatible with landholder beliefs about appropriate use of agricultural land.

    AB - Tree planting for carbon sequestration is a commonly proposed climate change mitigation strategy, with afforestation projects forming part of voluntary and mandatory carbon offset trading schemes. Afforestation is often promoted as a new economic opportunity for private landholders. While multiple studies have identified physical and economic opportunities for afforestation, few have examined the willingness of private landholders to adopt afforestation, and the factors that influence this willingness. We examine this using data from a survey of Australian landholders. The willingness of landholders to adopt afforestation for carbon sequestration varies substantially depending on how this afforestation is designed and implemented: landholders prefer small plantings on less productive land, which minimise the disturbance afforestation presents to land management, and to landholder values about appropriate uses of agricultural land. Landholders are less willing to consider afforestation if it involves planting the large areas required by many current carbon afforestation schemes. Willingness to adopt afforestation is influenced in particular by landholder's perceptions of its potential to provide a diversified income stream, and its impacts on flexibility of land management. More broadly, it is influenced by their views about the social acceptability of afforestation, particularly whether the landholder believes trees should be planted on agricultural land, and how they believe others in the community view afforestation. Our results suggest that widespread adoption requires designing afforestation so it (i) provides a range of socio-economic benefits that go beyond provision of income; (ii) minimises disruption to land management flexibility; and (iii) is compatible with landholder beliefs about appropriate use of agricultural land.

    KW - Adoption

    KW - Afforestation

    KW - Carbon sequestration

    KW - Mitigation

    KW - Reforestation

    U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.009

    DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.009

    M3 - Article

    VL - 24

    SP - 306

    EP - 320

    JO - Global Environmental Change

    JF - Global Environmental Change

    SN - 0959-3780

    IS - 1

    ER -