Assessing the quality of ontology

Rosetta Romano, Craig McDonald

    Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

    Abstract

    In the Information Sciences an ontology specifies the conceptual structure of a knowledge domain through its vocabulary and its meaning, or semantics. Examples of ontologies include database schemas, taxonomies and library classification schemes. Computer-based ontologies specify a common understanding of a domain both for its different human users and for automated information processes such as interpretation, aggregation, manipulation, etc. As an ontology is fundamental to systems in an organisation and to communication between organisations, its quality is critically important for the sound operation of those systems. But there is a problem in that there seems to be no systematic basis or method for conducting an assessment of the quality of an ontology. There is an abundance of literature proposing ideas about what constitutes a 'good' ontology, but it is diverse, incoherent and untested. This paper reports research which reviewed the literature, extracted some 220 quality criteria, formulated these into an assessment instrument and partially demonstrated the instrument in a case study. The demonstration showed some of the difficulties associated with assessing quality, in particular, the difficulty of grounding the criteria in the actuality of the case and in interpreting the results of an assessment.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationMCIS 2011 Proceedings
    Place of PublicationUSA
    PublisherAIS Electronic Library (AISeL)
    Pages1-12
    Number of pages12
    Volume1
    Publication statusPublished - 2011
    Event6th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems - Cloud Computing Track: MCIS 2011 - Limassol, Limassol, Cyprus
    Duration: 3 Sep 20115 Sep 2011
    https://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2011/

    Conference

    Conference6th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems - Cloud Computing Track
    Abbreviated titleMCIS 2011
    CountryCyprus
    CityLimassol
    Period3/09/115/09/11
    Internet address

    Fingerprint

    ontology
    information process
    information science
    aggregation
    taxonomy
    manipulation
    vocabulary
    semantics
    interpretation
    communication
    knowledge
    literature

    Cite this

    Romano, R., & McDonald, C. (2011). Assessing the quality of ontology. In MCIS 2011 Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 1-12). USA: AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).
    Romano, Rosetta ; McDonald, Craig. / Assessing the quality of ontology. MCIS 2011 Proceedings. Vol. 1 USA : AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2011. pp. 1-12
    @inproceedings{725a1b35919b443f8efb23b3d8f8a5d8,
    title = "Assessing the quality of ontology",
    abstract = "In the Information Sciences an ontology specifies the conceptual structure of a knowledge domain through its vocabulary and its meaning, or semantics. Examples of ontologies include database schemas, taxonomies and library classification schemes. Computer-based ontologies specify a common understanding of a domain both for its different human users and for automated information processes such as interpretation, aggregation, manipulation, etc. As an ontology is fundamental to systems in an organisation and to communication between organisations, its quality is critically important for the sound operation of those systems. But there is a problem in that there seems to be no systematic basis or method for conducting an assessment of the quality of an ontology. There is an abundance of literature proposing ideas about what constitutes a 'good' ontology, but it is diverse, incoherent and untested. This paper reports research which reviewed the literature, extracted some 220 quality criteria, formulated these into an assessment instrument and partially demonstrated the instrument in a case study. The demonstration showed some of the difficulties associated with assessing quality, in particular, the difficulty of grounding the criteria in the actuality of the case and in interpreting the results of an assessment.",
    keywords = "Ontology Quality",
    author = "Rosetta Romano and Craig McDonald",
    year = "2011",
    language = "English",
    volume = "1",
    pages = "1--12",
    booktitle = "MCIS 2011 Proceedings",
    publisher = "AIS Electronic Library (AISeL)",

    }

    Romano, R & McDonald, C 2011, Assessing the quality of ontology. in MCIS 2011 Proceedings. vol. 1, AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), USA, pp. 1-12, 6th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems - Cloud Computing Track, Limassol, Cyprus, 3/09/11.

    Assessing the quality of ontology. / Romano, Rosetta; McDonald, Craig.

    MCIS 2011 Proceedings. Vol. 1 USA : AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2011. p. 1-12.

    Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Assessing the quality of ontology

    AU - Romano, Rosetta

    AU - McDonald, Craig

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - In the Information Sciences an ontology specifies the conceptual structure of a knowledge domain through its vocabulary and its meaning, or semantics. Examples of ontologies include database schemas, taxonomies and library classification schemes. Computer-based ontologies specify a common understanding of a domain both for its different human users and for automated information processes such as interpretation, aggregation, manipulation, etc. As an ontology is fundamental to systems in an organisation and to communication between organisations, its quality is critically important for the sound operation of those systems. But there is a problem in that there seems to be no systematic basis or method for conducting an assessment of the quality of an ontology. There is an abundance of literature proposing ideas about what constitutes a 'good' ontology, but it is diverse, incoherent and untested. This paper reports research which reviewed the literature, extracted some 220 quality criteria, formulated these into an assessment instrument and partially demonstrated the instrument in a case study. The demonstration showed some of the difficulties associated with assessing quality, in particular, the difficulty of grounding the criteria in the actuality of the case and in interpreting the results of an assessment.

    AB - In the Information Sciences an ontology specifies the conceptual structure of a knowledge domain through its vocabulary and its meaning, or semantics. Examples of ontologies include database schemas, taxonomies and library classification schemes. Computer-based ontologies specify a common understanding of a domain both for its different human users and for automated information processes such as interpretation, aggregation, manipulation, etc. As an ontology is fundamental to systems in an organisation and to communication between organisations, its quality is critically important for the sound operation of those systems. But there is a problem in that there seems to be no systematic basis or method for conducting an assessment of the quality of an ontology. There is an abundance of literature proposing ideas about what constitutes a 'good' ontology, but it is diverse, incoherent and untested. This paper reports research which reviewed the literature, extracted some 220 quality criteria, formulated these into an assessment instrument and partially demonstrated the instrument in a case study. The demonstration showed some of the difficulties associated with assessing quality, in particular, the difficulty of grounding the criteria in the actuality of the case and in interpreting the results of an assessment.

    KW - Ontology Quality

    M3 - Conference contribution

    VL - 1

    SP - 1

    EP - 12

    BT - MCIS 2011 Proceedings

    PB - AIS Electronic Library (AISeL)

    CY - USA

    ER -

    Romano R, McDonald C. Assessing the quality of ontology. In MCIS 2011 Proceedings. Vol. 1. USA: AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). 2011. p. 1-12