Assessment of peroxide oxidation for acid sulfate soil analysis.

1. Reduced inorganic sulfur

Nicholas J. Ward, Leigh A. Sullivan, Richard T. Bush, Chuxia Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The reduced inorganic sulfur fraction of 4 acid sulfate soil (ASS) materials was quantified using a variety of peroxide oxidation procedures. The temperature and duration of the peroxide oxidation were found to markedly affect the peroxide oxidisable sulfur determination. For 3 ASS materials with low total carbon content (i.e. <2.5% C), peroxide oxidisable sulfur underestimated the reduced inorganic sulfur fraction, with the peroxide oxidisable sulfur determinations being as low as 42% of those determined using chromium reducible sulfur technique. The precipitation of jarosite during peroxide oxidation was a major factor contributing to the underestimation of reduced inorganic sulfur in these materials. Apparent losses of sulfur of approximately 25% on average occurred during peroxide oxidation budget accounting; this also contributed towards the observed underestimation of reduced inorganic sulfur. It is most likely that these unaccounted losses are due to atmospheric losses of sulfur. In a peat ASS, one of the peroxide oxidation methods overestimated the reduced inorganic sulfur fraction and was attributed to the release of a large reserve of organic sulfur in this material by the peroxide. This study shows the peroxide oxidation methods examined here are subject to substantial interferences. Consequently these peroxide oxidation methods are unable to reliably provide accurate measurements of the reduced inorganic sulfur fraction in ASS materials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)433-442
Number of pages10
JournalAustralian Journal of Soil Research
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

acid sulfate soils
acid sulfate soil
soil analysis
Peroxides
peroxides
Sulfur
Sulfates
sulfur
oxidation
Soils
Oxidation
Acids
Sulfur determination
Peat
Chromium
jarosite
methodology
chromium
Carbon
peat

Cite this

@article{e656e205b458472bb114e737c9f03ffe,
title = "Assessment of peroxide oxidation for acid sulfate soil analysis.: 1. Reduced inorganic sulfur",
abstract = "The reduced inorganic sulfur fraction of 4 acid sulfate soil (ASS) materials was quantified using a variety of peroxide oxidation procedures. The temperature and duration of the peroxide oxidation were found to markedly affect the peroxide oxidisable sulfur determination. For 3 ASS materials with low total carbon content (i.e. <2.5{\%} C), peroxide oxidisable sulfur underestimated the reduced inorganic sulfur fraction, with the peroxide oxidisable sulfur determinations being as low as 42{\%} of those determined using chromium reducible sulfur technique. The precipitation of jarosite during peroxide oxidation was a major factor contributing to the underestimation of reduced inorganic sulfur in these materials. Apparent losses of sulfur of approximately 25{\%} on average occurred during peroxide oxidation budget accounting; this also contributed towards the observed underestimation of reduced inorganic sulfur. It is most likely that these unaccounted losses are due to atmospheric losses of sulfur. In a peat ASS, one of the peroxide oxidation methods overestimated the reduced inorganic sulfur fraction and was attributed to the release of a large reserve of organic sulfur in this material by the peroxide. This study shows the peroxide oxidation methods examined here are subject to substantial interferences. Consequently these peroxide oxidation methods are unable to reliably provide accurate measurements of the reduced inorganic sulfur fraction in ASS materials.",
keywords = "Chromium reducible sulfur, Jarosite, Peroxide oxidisable sulfur, Pyritic sulfur, Sulfur budget",
author = "Ward, {Nicholas J.} and Sullivan, {Leigh A.} and Bush, {Richard T.} and Chuxia Lin",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1071/SR01009",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "433--442",
journal = "Australian Journal of Soil Research",
issn = "0004-9573",
publisher = "CSIRO",
number = "3",

}

Assessment of peroxide oxidation for acid sulfate soil analysis. 1. Reduced inorganic sulfur. / Ward, Nicholas J.; Sullivan, Leigh A.; Bush, Richard T.; Lin, Chuxia.

In: Australian Journal of Soil Research, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2002, p. 433-442.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of peroxide oxidation for acid sulfate soil analysis.

T2 - 1. Reduced inorganic sulfur

AU - Ward, Nicholas J.

AU - Sullivan, Leigh A.

AU - Bush, Richard T.

AU - Lin, Chuxia

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The reduced inorganic sulfur fraction of 4 acid sulfate soil (ASS) materials was quantified using a variety of peroxide oxidation procedures. The temperature and duration of the peroxide oxidation were found to markedly affect the peroxide oxidisable sulfur determination. For 3 ASS materials with low total carbon content (i.e. <2.5% C), peroxide oxidisable sulfur underestimated the reduced inorganic sulfur fraction, with the peroxide oxidisable sulfur determinations being as low as 42% of those determined using chromium reducible sulfur technique. The precipitation of jarosite during peroxide oxidation was a major factor contributing to the underestimation of reduced inorganic sulfur in these materials. Apparent losses of sulfur of approximately 25% on average occurred during peroxide oxidation budget accounting; this also contributed towards the observed underestimation of reduced inorganic sulfur. It is most likely that these unaccounted losses are due to atmospheric losses of sulfur. In a peat ASS, one of the peroxide oxidation methods overestimated the reduced inorganic sulfur fraction and was attributed to the release of a large reserve of organic sulfur in this material by the peroxide. This study shows the peroxide oxidation methods examined here are subject to substantial interferences. Consequently these peroxide oxidation methods are unable to reliably provide accurate measurements of the reduced inorganic sulfur fraction in ASS materials.

AB - The reduced inorganic sulfur fraction of 4 acid sulfate soil (ASS) materials was quantified using a variety of peroxide oxidation procedures. The temperature and duration of the peroxide oxidation were found to markedly affect the peroxide oxidisable sulfur determination. For 3 ASS materials with low total carbon content (i.e. <2.5% C), peroxide oxidisable sulfur underestimated the reduced inorganic sulfur fraction, with the peroxide oxidisable sulfur determinations being as low as 42% of those determined using chromium reducible sulfur technique. The precipitation of jarosite during peroxide oxidation was a major factor contributing to the underestimation of reduced inorganic sulfur in these materials. Apparent losses of sulfur of approximately 25% on average occurred during peroxide oxidation budget accounting; this also contributed towards the observed underestimation of reduced inorganic sulfur. It is most likely that these unaccounted losses are due to atmospheric losses of sulfur. In a peat ASS, one of the peroxide oxidation methods overestimated the reduced inorganic sulfur fraction and was attributed to the release of a large reserve of organic sulfur in this material by the peroxide. This study shows the peroxide oxidation methods examined here are subject to substantial interferences. Consequently these peroxide oxidation methods are unable to reliably provide accurate measurements of the reduced inorganic sulfur fraction in ASS materials.

KW - Chromium reducible sulfur

KW - Jarosite

KW - Peroxide oxidisable sulfur

KW - Pyritic sulfur

KW - Sulfur budget

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036259362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1071/SR01009

DO - 10.1071/SR01009

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 433

EP - 442

JO - Australian Journal of Soil Research

JF - Australian Journal of Soil Research

SN - 0004-9573

IS - 3

ER -