Association of BMI and interpregnancy BMI change with birth outcomes in an Australian obstetric population: A retrospective cohort study

Cathy KNIGHT-AGARWAL, Lauren Williams, Deborah DAVIS, Rachel DAVEY, Tom COCHRANE, Peter Rickwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56 Citations (Scopus)
81 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: To assess maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with increasing body mass index (BMI) and interpregnancy BMI changes in an Australian obstetric population. Methods: A retrospective cohort study from 2008 to 2013 was undertaken. BMI for 14 875 women was categorised as follows: underweight (=18 kg/m2); normal weight (19-24 kg/m2); overweight (25-29 kg/m2); obese class I (30-34 kg/m2); obese class II (35-39 kg/m2) and obese class III (40+ kg/m2). BMI categories and maternal, neonatal and birthing outcomes were examined using logistic regression. Interpregnancy change in BMI and the risk of adverse outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy were also examined. Results: Within this cohort, 751 (5.1%) women were underweight, 7431 (50.0%) had normal BMI, 3748 (25.1%) were overweight, 1598 (10.8%) were obese class I, 737 (5.0%) were obese class II and 592 (4.0%) were obese class III. In bivariate adjusted models, obese women were at an increased risk of caesarean section, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and neonatal morbidities including macrosomia, large for gestational age (LGA), hypoglycaemia, low 5 min Apgar score and respiratory distress. Multiparous women who experienced an interpregnancy increase of =3 BMI units had a higher adjusted OR (AOR) (CI) of the following adverse outcomes in their subsequent pregnancy: low 5-min Apgar score 3.242 (1.557 to 7.118); gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) 3.258 (1.129 to 10.665) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy 3.922 (1.243 to 14.760). These women were more likely to give birth vaginally 2.030 (1.417 to 2.913). Conversely, women whose parity changed from 0 to 1 and who experienced an interpregnancy increase of =3 BMI units had a higher AOR (CI) of caesarean section in their second pregnancy 1.806 (1.139 to 2.862). Conclusions: Women who are overweight or obese have a significantly increased risk of various adverse outcomes. Interpregnancy weight gain, regardless of parity and baseline BMI, also increases various adverse outcomes. Effective weight management strategies are needed.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere010667
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalBMJ Open
Volume6
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association of BMI and interpregnancy BMI change with birth outcomes in an Australian obstetric population: A retrospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this