At the intersection of science and politics

Defining exceptional drought

David H. White, Linda Courtenay Botterill, Bruce O’Meagher

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Australia introduced the National Drought Policy (NDP) in 1992 based on principles of self-reliance and risk management (see Chapter 4). The NDP was an agreement between the national and state governments which sought, for the first time, to deliver a nationally consistent approach to drought policy. Based on these principles, the governments agreed to provide additional support for drought-related research and development and improved farm management practices and to reorient their direct farm assistance policies away from ad hoc assistance to “farmers in trouble”, i.e., towards farm business and welfare support directed at increased self-reliance and risk management based on objective, science-driven decision making. Against this background, the NDP included recognition that occasionally farmers face rare and severe events that are outside the preparedness strategies of even the best managers. These events were classified as “exceptional circumstances” (EC). The declaration of EC provided a trigger initially for the provision of farm business support
and after 1994 for farm family welfare assistance to individual farm units by the
national government. This assistance comprised extremely generous access to
components of the welfare system (including income support) and generous interest ratesubsidies previously denied. Although the state governments had agreed to phase out the provision of drought-related support, not all states have done so by the time of writing.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationFrom Disaster Response to Risk Management
Subtitle of host publicationAustralia's National Drought Policy
EditorsLinda Courtenay Botterill, Donald A. Wilhite
PublisherSpringer
Chapter7
Pages99-111
Number of pages13
Volume22
ISBN (Electronic)1402031246
ISBN (Print)1402031238
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameAdvances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research
Volume22
ISSN (Print)1878-9897
ISSN (Electronic)2213-6959

Fingerprint

Drought
drought
Farms
farm
politics
assistance
science
Risk management
risk management
farmer
welfare
family welfare
family farm
government and state
event
research and development
management practice
Industry
Managers
Decision making

Cite this

White, D. H., Botterill, L. C., & O’Meagher, B. (2005). At the intersection of science and politics: Defining exceptional drought. In L. C. Botterill, & D. A. Wilhite (Eds.), From Disaster Response to Risk Management: Australia's National Drought Policy (Vol. 22, pp. 99-111). (Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research; Vol. 22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3124-6_8
White, David H. ; Botterill, Linda Courtenay ; O’Meagher, Bruce. / At the intersection of science and politics : Defining exceptional drought. From Disaster Response to Risk Management: Australia's National Drought Policy. editor / Linda Courtenay Botterill ; Donald A. Wilhite. Vol. 22 Springer, 2005. pp. 99-111 (Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research).
@inbook{f07b6297a99d42ca9299e06d76769363,
title = "At the intersection of science and politics: Defining exceptional drought",
abstract = "Australia introduced the National Drought Policy (NDP) in 1992 based on principles of self-reliance and risk management (see Chapter 4). The NDP was an agreement between the national and state governments which sought, for the first time, to deliver a nationally consistent approach to drought policy. Based on these principles, the governments agreed to provide additional support for drought-related research and development and improved farm management practices and to reorient their direct farm assistance policies away from ad hoc assistance to “farmers in trouble”, i.e., towards farm business and welfare support directed at increased self-reliance and risk management based on objective, science-driven decision making. Against this background, the NDP included recognition that occasionally farmers face rare and severe events that are outside the preparedness strategies of even the best managers. These events were classified as “exceptional circumstances” (EC). The declaration of EC provided a trigger initially for the provision of farm business supportand after 1994 for farm family welfare assistance to individual farm units by thenational government. This assistance comprised extremely generous access tocomponents of the welfare system (including income support) and generous interest ratesubsidies previously denied. Although the state governments had agreed to phase out the provision of drought-related support, not all states have done so by the time of writing.",
author = "White, {David H.} and Botterill, {Linda Courtenay} and Bruce O’Meagher",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1007/1-4020-3124-6_8",
language = "English",
isbn = "1402031238",
volume = "22",
series = "Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "99--111",
editor = "Botterill, {Linda Courtenay} and Wilhite, {Donald A.}",
booktitle = "From Disaster Response to Risk Management",
address = "Netherlands",

}

White, DH, Botterill, LC & O’Meagher, B 2005, At the intersection of science and politics: Defining exceptional drought. in LC Botterill & DA Wilhite (eds), From Disaster Response to Risk Management: Australia's National Drought Policy. vol. 22, Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol. 22, Springer, pp. 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3124-6_8

At the intersection of science and politics : Defining exceptional drought. / White, David H.; Botterill, Linda Courtenay; O’Meagher, Bruce.

From Disaster Response to Risk Management: Australia's National Drought Policy. ed. / Linda Courtenay Botterill; Donald A. Wilhite. Vol. 22 Springer, 2005. p. 99-111 (Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research; Vol. 22).

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - At the intersection of science and politics

T2 - Defining exceptional drought

AU - White, David H.

AU - Botterill, Linda Courtenay

AU - O’Meagher, Bruce

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Australia introduced the National Drought Policy (NDP) in 1992 based on principles of self-reliance and risk management (see Chapter 4). The NDP was an agreement between the national and state governments which sought, for the first time, to deliver a nationally consistent approach to drought policy. Based on these principles, the governments agreed to provide additional support for drought-related research and development and improved farm management practices and to reorient their direct farm assistance policies away from ad hoc assistance to “farmers in trouble”, i.e., towards farm business and welfare support directed at increased self-reliance and risk management based on objective, science-driven decision making. Against this background, the NDP included recognition that occasionally farmers face rare and severe events that are outside the preparedness strategies of even the best managers. These events were classified as “exceptional circumstances” (EC). The declaration of EC provided a trigger initially for the provision of farm business supportand after 1994 for farm family welfare assistance to individual farm units by thenational government. This assistance comprised extremely generous access tocomponents of the welfare system (including income support) and generous interest ratesubsidies previously denied. Although the state governments had agreed to phase out the provision of drought-related support, not all states have done so by the time of writing.

AB - Australia introduced the National Drought Policy (NDP) in 1992 based on principles of self-reliance and risk management (see Chapter 4). The NDP was an agreement between the national and state governments which sought, for the first time, to deliver a nationally consistent approach to drought policy. Based on these principles, the governments agreed to provide additional support for drought-related research and development and improved farm management practices and to reorient their direct farm assistance policies away from ad hoc assistance to “farmers in trouble”, i.e., towards farm business and welfare support directed at increased self-reliance and risk management based on objective, science-driven decision making. Against this background, the NDP included recognition that occasionally farmers face rare and severe events that are outside the preparedness strategies of even the best managers. These events were classified as “exceptional circumstances” (EC). The declaration of EC provided a trigger initially for the provision of farm business supportand after 1994 for farm family welfare assistance to individual farm units by thenational government. This assistance comprised extremely generous access tocomponents of the welfare system (including income support) and generous interest ratesubsidies previously denied. Although the state governments had agreed to phase out the provision of drought-related support, not all states have done so by the time of writing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028308242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/1-4020-3124-6_8

DO - 10.1007/1-4020-3124-6_8

M3 - Chapter

SN - 1402031238

VL - 22

T3 - Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research

SP - 99

EP - 111

BT - From Disaster Response to Risk Management

A2 - Botterill, Linda Courtenay

A2 - Wilhite, Donald A.

PB - Springer

ER -

White DH, Botterill LC, O’Meagher B. At the intersection of science and politics: Defining exceptional drought. In Botterill LC, Wilhite DA, editors, From Disaster Response to Risk Management: Australia's National Drought Policy. Vol. 22. Springer. 2005. p. 99-111. (Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3124-6_8