Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry

David Alais, Jeroen J. van Boxtel, Amanda Parker, Raymond van Ee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A previous study has shown that diverting attention from binocular rivalry to a visual distractor task results in a slowing of rivalry alternation rate between simple orthogonal orientations. Here, we investigate whether the slowing of visual perceptual alternations will occur when attention is diverted to an auditory distractor task, and we extend the investigation by testing this for two kinds of binocular rivalry stimuli and for the Necker cube. Our results show that doing the auditory attention task does indeed slow visual perceptual alternations, that the slowing effect is a graded function of attentional load, and that the attentional slowing effect is less pronounced for grating rivalry than for house/face rivalry and for the Necker cube. These results are explained in terms of supramodal attentional resources modulating a high-level interpretative process in perceptual ambiguity, together with a role for feedback to early visual processes in the case of binocular rivalry.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)929-935
Number of pages7
JournalVision Research
Volume50
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2010
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Alais, David ; van Boxtel, Jeroen J. ; Parker, Amanda ; van Ee, Raymond. / Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry. In: Vision Research. 2010 ; Vol. 50, No. 10. pp. 929-935.
@article{2110e111b1194422a006cf499668b511,
title = "Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry",
abstract = "A previous study has shown that diverting attention from binocular rivalry to a visual distractor task results in a slowing of rivalry alternation rate between simple orthogonal orientations. Here, we investigate whether the slowing of visual perceptual alternations will occur when attention is diverted to an auditory distractor task, and we extend the investigation by testing this for two kinds of binocular rivalry stimuli and for the Necker cube. Our results show that doing the auditory attention task does indeed slow visual perceptual alternations, that the slowing effect is a graded function of attentional load, and that the attentional slowing effect is less pronounced for grating rivalry than for house/face rivalry and for the Necker cube. These results are explained in terms of supramodal attentional resources modulating a high-level interpretative process in perceptual ambiguity, together with a role for feedback to early visual processes in the case of binocular rivalry.",
keywords = "Audiovisual interactions, Binocular rivalry, Perceptual ambiguity",
author = "David Alais and {van Boxtel}, {Jeroen J.} and Amanda Parker and {van Ee}, Raymond",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.010",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "929--935",
journal = "Clinical Vision Sciences",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "10",

}

Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry. / Alais, David; van Boxtel, Jeroen J.; Parker, Amanda; van Ee, Raymond.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 50, No. 10, 01.05.2010, p. 929-935.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry

AU - Alais, David

AU - van Boxtel, Jeroen J.

AU - Parker, Amanda

AU - van Ee, Raymond

PY - 2010/5/1

Y1 - 2010/5/1

N2 - A previous study has shown that diverting attention from binocular rivalry to a visual distractor task results in a slowing of rivalry alternation rate between simple orthogonal orientations. Here, we investigate whether the slowing of visual perceptual alternations will occur when attention is diverted to an auditory distractor task, and we extend the investigation by testing this for two kinds of binocular rivalry stimuli and for the Necker cube. Our results show that doing the auditory attention task does indeed slow visual perceptual alternations, that the slowing effect is a graded function of attentional load, and that the attentional slowing effect is less pronounced for grating rivalry than for house/face rivalry and for the Necker cube. These results are explained in terms of supramodal attentional resources modulating a high-level interpretative process in perceptual ambiguity, together with a role for feedback to early visual processes in the case of binocular rivalry.

AB - A previous study has shown that diverting attention from binocular rivalry to a visual distractor task results in a slowing of rivalry alternation rate between simple orthogonal orientations. Here, we investigate whether the slowing of visual perceptual alternations will occur when attention is diverted to an auditory distractor task, and we extend the investigation by testing this for two kinds of binocular rivalry stimuli and for the Necker cube. Our results show that doing the auditory attention task does indeed slow visual perceptual alternations, that the slowing effect is a graded function of attentional load, and that the attentional slowing effect is less pronounced for grating rivalry than for house/face rivalry and for the Necker cube. These results are explained in terms of supramodal attentional resources modulating a high-level interpretative process in perceptual ambiguity, together with a role for feedback to early visual processes in the case of binocular rivalry.

KW - Audiovisual interactions

KW - Binocular rivalry

KW - Perceptual ambiguity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952008990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.010

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.010

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 929

EP - 935

JO - Clinical Vision Sciences

JF - Clinical Vision Sciences

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 10

ER -