Attitudes towards donor insemination-a post-warnock survey

Andy Walker, Sue Gregson, Eileen Mclaughlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a multi-centred study, a total of 799 patients, donors and health-care professionals concerned with artificial insemination with donor semen (AID) responded to a questionnaire regarding their attitudes towards current provision of AID services and proposed legislation. There was little support for any fundamental change in the way in which AID is practised, at least in those centres. The anonymous status of the donor met with universal agreement. Although there was some support for the communication of non-identifying details to the recipient couple, where they wanted them, there was no support for any legislation which might give the AID child a right of access to details of the donor. The greatest divergence of opinion was over the question of who should have access to AID treatment and whether or not screening procedures should be applied to prospective parents. Most respondents felt that the closed and confidential relationship between the clinic and the other parties involved should not automatically be extended to general practitioners or any national bodies. In respect of specific recommendations of the Warnock Committee, there was support for changes which might legitimize or assist the present system, but not for any which might be restrictive.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)745-750
Number of pages6
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume2
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Insemination
Tissue Donors
Legislation
Semen
General Practitioners
Surveys and Questionnaires
Parents
Communication
Delivery of Health Care

Cite this

Walker, Andy ; Gregson, Sue ; Mclaughlin, Eileen. / Attitudes towards donor insemination-a post-warnock survey. In: Human Reproduction. 1987 ; Vol. 2, No. 8. pp. 745-750.
@article{32e47c3f73034575a05a9c5d232ccdc7,
title = "Attitudes towards donor insemination-a post-warnock survey",
abstract = "In a multi-centred study, a total of 799 patients, donors and health-care professionals concerned with artificial insemination with donor semen (AID) responded to a questionnaire regarding their attitudes towards current provision of AID services and proposed legislation. There was little support for any fundamental change in the way in which AID is practised, at least in those centres. The anonymous status of the donor met with universal agreement. Although there was some support for the communication of non-identifying details to the recipient couple, where they wanted them, there was no support for any legislation which might give the AID child a right of access to details of the donor. The greatest divergence of opinion was over the question of who should have access to AID treatment and whether or not screening procedures should be applied to prospective parents. Most respondents felt that the closed and confidential relationship between the clinic and the other parties involved should not automatically be extended to general practitioners or any national bodies. In respect of specific recommendations of the Warnock Committee, there was support for changes which might legitimize or assist the present system, but not for any which might be restrictive.",
keywords = "Artificial insemination by donor semen, Male infertility, Spermatozoa",
author = "Andy Walker and Sue Gregson and Eileen Mclaughlin",
year = "1987",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136625",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "745--750",
journal = "Human Reproduction",
issn = "0268-1161",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "8",

}

Attitudes towards donor insemination-a post-warnock survey. / Walker, Andy; Gregson, Sue; Mclaughlin, Eileen.

In: Human Reproduction, Vol. 2, No. 8, 01.11.1987, p. 745-750.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes towards donor insemination-a post-warnock survey

AU - Walker, Andy

AU - Gregson, Sue

AU - Mclaughlin, Eileen

PY - 1987/11/1

Y1 - 1987/11/1

N2 - In a multi-centred study, a total of 799 patients, donors and health-care professionals concerned with artificial insemination with donor semen (AID) responded to a questionnaire regarding their attitudes towards current provision of AID services and proposed legislation. There was little support for any fundamental change in the way in which AID is practised, at least in those centres. The anonymous status of the donor met with universal agreement. Although there was some support for the communication of non-identifying details to the recipient couple, where they wanted them, there was no support for any legislation which might give the AID child a right of access to details of the donor. The greatest divergence of opinion was over the question of who should have access to AID treatment and whether or not screening procedures should be applied to prospective parents. Most respondents felt that the closed and confidential relationship between the clinic and the other parties involved should not automatically be extended to general practitioners or any national bodies. In respect of specific recommendations of the Warnock Committee, there was support for changes which might legitimize or assist the present system, but not for any which might be restrictive.

AB - In a multi-centred study, a total of 799 patients, donors and health-care professionals concerned with artificial insemination with donor semen (AID) responded to a questionnaire regarding their attitudes towards current provision of AID services and proposed legislation. There was little support for any fundamental change in the way in which AID is practised, at least in those centres. The anonymous status of the donor met with universal agreement. Although there was some support for the communication of non-identifying details to the recipient couple, where they wanted them, there was no support for any legislation which might give the AID child a right of access to details of the donor. The greatest divergence of opinion was over the question of who should have access to AID treatment and whether or not screening procedures should be applied to prospective parents. Most respondents felt that the closed and confidential relationship between the clinic and the other parties involved should not automatically be extended to general practitioners or any national bodies. In respect of specific recommendations of the Warnock Committee, there was support for changes which might legitimize or assist the present system, but not for any which might be restrictive.

KW - Artificial insemination by donor semen

KW - Male infertility

KW - Spermatozoa

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023597734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136625

DO - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136625

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 745

EP - 750

JO - Human Reproduction

JF - Human Reproduction

SN - 0268-1161

IS - 8

ER -