Australian Muslims’ Orientations to Secular Society: Empirical Exploration of Theoretical Classifications

John DRYZEK, Bora Kanra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article applies Q methodology in order to explore Australian Muslims’ orientations to the secular society in which they live. The analysis is guided by some theoretical claims that are made about the dispositions of Muslims who live in Western societies. While a simple ‘closed’ versus ‘open’ dichotomy has some plausibility, deeper investigation reveals four empirical types: respectively, semi-engaged, coexisting, assertively religious and untroubled participant. These four types vary in the same direction from the theoretical specification that informed the search for the type in question in a way that appears to reduce the tension between the type and the norms of secular society. Generalizations commonly made in both popular and scholarly discourse about the problematic character of Muslim orientations to secular society appear not to apply in Australia.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)182-198
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Sociology
Volume50
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Muslim
disposition
discourse
methodology
society
Society

Cite this

@article{a2d8875fb2fa47c68dcc96e92bc3ee68,
title = "Australian Muslims’ Orientations to Secular Society: Empirical Exploration of Theoretical Classifications",
abstract = "This article applies Q methodology in order to explore Australian Muslims’ orientations to the secular society in which they live. The analysis is guided by some theoretical claims that are made about the dispositions of Muslims who live in Western societies. While a simple ‘closed’ versus ‘open’ dichotomy has some plausibility, deeper investigation reveals four empirical types: respectively, semi-engaged, coexisting, assertively religious and untroubled participant. These four types vary in the same direction from the theoretical specification that informed the search for the type in question in a way that appears to reduce the tension between the type and the norms of secular society. Generalizations commonly made in both popular and scholarly discourse about the problematic character of Muslim orientations to secular society appear not to apply in Australia.",
author = "John DRYZEK and Bora Kanra",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "182--198",
journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology",
issn = "1440-7833",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

Australian Muslims’ Orientations to Secular Society: Empirical Exploration of Theoretical Classifications. / DRYZEK, John; Kanra, Bora.

In: Journal of Sociology, Vol. 50, 2014, p. 182-198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Australian Muslims’ Orientations to Secular Society: Empirical Exploration of Theoretical Classifications

AU - DRYZEK, John

AU - Kanra, Bora

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This article applies Q methodology in order to explore Australian Muslims’ orientations to the secular society in which they live. The analysis is guided by some theoretical claims that are made about the dispositions of Muslims who live in Western societies. While a simple ‘closed’ versus ‘open’ dichotomy has some plausibility, deeper investigation reveals four empirical types: respectively, semi-engaged, coexisting, assertively religious and untroubled participant. These four types vary in the same direction from the theoretical specification that informed the search for the type in question in a way that appears to reduce the tension between the type and the norms of secular society. Generalizations commonly made in both popular and scholarly discourse about the problematic character of Muslim orientations to secular society appear not to apply in Australia.

AB - This article applies Q methodology in order to explore Australian Muslims’ orientations to the secular society in which they live. The analysis is guided by some theoretical claims that are made about the dispositions of Muslims who live in Western societies. While a simple ‘closed’ versus ‘open’ dichotomy has some plausibility, deeper investigation reveals four empirical types: respectively, semi-engaged, coexisting, assertively religious and untroubled participant. These four types vary in the same direction from the theoretical specification that informed the search for the type in question in a way that appears to reduce the tension between the type and the norms of secular society. Generalizations commonly made in both popular and scholarly discourse about the problematic character of Muslim orientations to secular society appear not to apply in Australia.

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 182

EP - 198

JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology

JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology

SN - 1440-7833

ER -