TY - JOUR
T1 - Australian occupational therapists' perspectives of consumers authentically contributing to student learning during practice placements
T2 - ‘It just makes sense!’ but ‘we need a process’
AU - Bevitt, Thomas
AU - Isbel, Stephen
AU - Pereira, Robert B.
AU - Bacon, Rachel
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was completed as part of the primary author's PhD studies. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in public, commercial, or not‐for‐profit sectors. In‐kind support was provided by the University of Canberra. Funding information
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Occupational Therapy Australia.
Funding Information:
This research was completed as part of the primary author's PhD studies. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in public, commercial, or not‐for‐profit sectors. In‐kind support was provided by the University of Canberra. Funding information
Funding Information:
The authors want to thank all the respondents who participated in this research. We want to acknowledge our academic and professional colleagues at the University of Canberra who provided counsel for idea development and our colleagues who assisted with testing the data collection tool. Open access publishing facilitated by University of Canberra, as part of the Wiley - University of Canberra agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Occupational Therapy Australia.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Introduction: Collaborating with consumers in designing, delivering, and evaluating curricula is an ongoing initiative within occupational therapy tertiary courses in Australia. Within the Australian educational context, consumers are involved in on-campus educational activities. Student occupational therapists must complete 1000 hours of practice placements as part of their education. To date, no research has explored how consumers could contribute to student occupational therapists' learning during practice placements. This study aimed to explore Australian occupational therapists' perceptions of consumers providing feedback to students during practice placements. Methods: A qualitative descriptive approach was adopted to engage with the diversity of practice contexts and gain a rich dataset from the occupational therapy profession. A qualitative questionnaire was developed and distributed using snowballing techniques. The questionnaire asked recipients to reflect on the risks, challenges, and benefits of consumers providing feedback to student occupational therapists from all stakeholders' perspectives. Demographic data were collated, and reflexive thematic analysis was used to construct themes. Findings: Responses were received from 81 participants. Most respondents identified as experienced occupational therapists from metropolitan locations across Australia. Reflective thematic analysis was used to construct three themes: Personal capability of consumers and students will enable, inhibit, and be developed by engaging in a feedback process; an educator-controlled process to ensure safety for all stakeholders is required for time-poor practice contexts; and us versus them: Shifting control to consumers can disempower practice educators. Conclusion: Engaging with consumers throughout all aspects of student occupational therapists' educational programme is required, including practice placements. New educational initiatives need to consider all stakeholders' concerns to ensure that authentic contribution from consumers is made within the various practice contexts. A co-design approach that involves all stakeholders to develop a feedback process may result in high-quality learning experiences that assist students to become safer, consumer-centred health professionals.
AB - Introduction: Collaborating with consumers in designing, delivering, and evaluating curricula is an ongoing initiative within occupational therapy tertiary courses in Australia. Within the Australian educational context, consumers are involved in on-campus educational activities. Student occupational therapists must complete 1000 hours of practice placements as part of their education. To date, no research has explored how consumers could contribute to student occupational therapists' learning during practice placements. This study aimed to explore Australian occupational therapists' perceptions of consumers providing feedback to students during practice placements. Methods: A qualitative descriptive approach was adopted to engage with the diversity of practice contexts and gain a rich dataset from the occupational therapy profession. A qualitative questionnaire was developed and distributed using snowballing techniques. The questionnaire asked recipients to reflect on the risks, challenges, and benefits of consumers providing feedback to student occupational therapists from all stakeholders' perspectives. Demographic data were collated, and reflexive thematic analysis was used to construct themes. Findings: Responses were received from 81 participants. Most respondents identified as experienced occupational therapists from metropolitan locations across Australia. Reflective thematic analysis was used to construct three themes: Personal capability of consumers and students will enable, inhibit, and be developed by engaging in a feedback process; an educator-controlled process to ensure safety for all stakeholders is required for time-poor practice contexts; and us versus them: Shifting control to consumers can disempower practice educators. Conclusion: Engaging with consumers throughout all aspects of student occupational therapists' educational programme is required, including practice placements. New educational initiatives need to consider all stakeholders' concerns to ensure that authentic contribution from consumers is made within the various practice contexts. A co-design approach that involves all stakeholders to develop a feedback process may result in high-quality learning experiences that assist students to become safer, consumer-centred health professionals.
KW - clinical education
KW - consumer feedback
KW - occupational therapy
KW - placements
KW - student
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142049045&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1440-1630.12853
DO - 10.1111/1440-1630.12853
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85142049045
SN - 0045-0766
VL - 69
SP - 753
EP - 765
JO - Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
JF - Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
IS - 6
ER -