Australian practice nursing

Collaboration in context

Eamon Merrick, Margaret Fry, Christine Duffield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To explore whether or not the context of Australian practice nursing supports collaborative decision-making about organisation and delivery of patient care. Background: Positive patient outcomes depend on Australian practice nurses participating in collaborative and interprofessional services, particularly for patients with chronic disease(s). It is unclear whether Australian practice nurses have the opportunity to collaborate in decision-making or how traditional organisational structures may support or hinder collaboration. Design: This is a descriptive exploratory study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using a purposive sample of practice nurses (n = 15). Thematic analysis was used to provide meaningful and contextual insights into how practice nurses participate in decision-making. Method: An interview tool, based on available literature, was developed and consisted of thirty open-ended questions to direct discussion during telephone interviews. Transcribed data were imported into NVivotm for analysis and interpretation. The collection, analysis and thematic interpretation of data were an iterative process. Findings: Participants fostered trusting interprofessional relationships, which enabled them to influence medical decision-making and thereby advocate for patient need. Trusting interprofessional relationships were perceived to alter the relative roles of the medical practitioner and practice nurse and enhance the opportunities for collaborative decision-making. Conclusions and relevance to clinical practice: Collaborative interprofessional care in Australian general practice must occur if increased demands for care are to be met. It is timely to consider how government policy, financial regulations and the organisation of Australian general practice can better support and enhance a collaborative contribution to care by practice nurses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3525-3532
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
Volume23
Issue number23-24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nursing
Nurses
Decision Making
Interviews
General Practice
Organizations
Nurse Practitioners
Patient Care
Chronic Disease

Cite this

Merrick, Eamon ; Fry, Margaret ; Duffield, Christine. / Australian practice nursing : Collaboration in context. In: Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2014 ; Vol. 23, No. 23-24. pp. 3525-3532.
@article{705c71cf31874da7a9c5b8a0739cd2c2,
title = "Australian practice nursing: Collaboration in context",
abstract = "Aims and objectives: To explore whether or not the context of Australian practice nursing supports collaborative decision-making about organisation and delivery of patient care. Background: Positive patient outcomes depend on Australian practice nurses participating in collaborative and interprofessional services, particularly for patients with chronic disease(s). It is unclear whether Australian practice nurses have the opportunity to collaborate in decision-making or how traditional organisational structures may support or hinder collaboration. Design: This is a descriptive exploratory study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using a purposive sample of practice nurses (n = 15). Thematic analysis was used to provide meaningful and contextual insights into how practice nurses participate in decision-making. Method: An interview tool, based on available literature, was developed and consisted of thirty open-ended questions to direct discussion during telephone interviews. Transcribed data were imported into NVivotm for analysis and interpretation. The collection, analysis and thematic interpretation of data were an iterative process. Findings: Participants fostered trusting interprofessional relationships, which enabled them to influence medical decision-making and thereby advocate for patient need. Trusting interprofessional relationships were perceived to alter the relative roles of the medical practitioner and practice nurse and enhance the opportunities for collaborative decision-making. Conclusions and relevance to clinical practice: Collaborative interprofessional care in Australian general practice must occur if increased demands for care are to be met. It is timely to consider how government policy, financial regulations and the organisation of Australian general practice can better support and enhance a collaborative contribution to care by practice nurses.",
keywords = "Interprofessional practice, Nurse roles, Policy, Practice nursing, Primary care",
author = "Eamon Merrick and Margaret Fry and Christine Duffield",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jocn.12605",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "3525--3532",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Nursing",
issn = "0962-1067",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "23-24",

}

Merrick, E, Fry, M & Duffield, C 2014, 'Australian practice nursing: Collaboration in context', Journal of Clinical Nursing, vol. 23, no. 23-24, pp. 3525-3532. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12605

Australian practice nursing : Collaboration in context. / Merrick, Eamon; Fry, Margaret; Duffield, Christine.

In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 23, No. 23-24, 01.12.2014, p. 3525-3532.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Australian practice nursing

T2 - Collaboration in context

AU - Merrick, Eamon

AU - Fry, Margaret

AU - Duffield, Christine

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Aims and objectives: To explore whether or not the context of Australian practice nursing supports collaborative decision-making about organisation and delivery of patient care. Background: Positive patient outcomes depend on Australian practice nurses participating in collaborative and interprofessional services, particularly for patients with chronic disease(s). It is unclear whether Australian practice nurses have the opportunity to collaborate in decision-making or how traditional organisational structures may support or hinder collaboration. Design: This is a descriptive exploratory study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using a purposive sample of practice nurses (n = 15). Thematic analysis was used to provide meaningful and contextual insights into how practice nurses participate in decision-making. Method: An interview tool, based on available literature, was developed and consisted of thirty open-ended questions to direct discussion during telephone interviews. Transcribed data were imported into NVivotm for analysis and interpretation. The collection, analysis and thematic interpretation of data were an iterative process. Findings: Participants fostered trusting interprofessional relationships, which enabled them to influence medical decision-making and thereby advocate for patient need. Trusting interprofessional relationships were perceived to alter the relative roles of the medical practitioner and practice nurse and enhance the opportunities for collaborative decision-making. Conclusions and relevance to clinical practice: Collaborative interprofessional care in Australian general practice must occur if increased demands for care are to be met. It is timely to consider how government policy, financial regulations and the organisation of Australian general practice can better support and enhance a collaborative contribution to care by practice nurses.

AB - Aims and objectives: To explore whether or not the context of Australian practice nursing supports collaborative decision-making about organisation and delivery of patient care. Background: Positive patient outcomes depend on Australian practice nurses participating in collaborative and interprofessional services, particularly for patients with chronic disease(s). It is unclear whether Australian practice nurses have the opportunity to collaborate in decision-making or how traditional organisational structures may support or hinder collaboration. Design: This is a descriptive exploratory study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using a purposive sample of practice nurses (n = 15). Thematic analysis was used to provide meaningful and contextual insights into how practice nurses participate in decision-making. Method: An interview tool, based on available literature, was developed and consisted of thirty open-ended questions to direct discussion during telephone interviews. Transcribed data were imported into NVivotm for analysis and interpretation. The collection, analysis and thematic interpretation of data were an iterative process. Findings: Participants fostered trusting interprofessional relationships, which enabled them to influence medical decision-making and thereby advocate for patient need. Trusting interprofessional relationships were perceived to alter the relative roles of the medical practitioner and practice nurse and enhance the opportunities for collaborative decision-making. Conclusions and relevance to clinical practice: Collaborative interprofessional care in Australian general practice must occur if increased demands for care are to be met. It is timely to consider how government policy, financial regulations and the organisation of Australian general practice can better support and enhance a collaborative contribution to care by practice nurses.

KW - Interprofessional practice

KW - Nurse roles

KW - Policy

KW - Practice nursing

KW - Primary care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963934613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jocn.12605

DO - 10.1111/jocn.12605

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 3525

EP - 3532

JO - Journal of Clinical Nursing

JF - Journal of Clinical Nursing

SN - 0962-1067

IS - 23-24

ER -