Australian water governance in the global context

understanding the benefits of localism

Lain DARE, Katherine A. Daniell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Effective water governance is essential for sustainable global futures. However, conflicting water values increases tension in water governance, highlighting the need for governance systems able to cope with competing objectives. In this paper, we explore the potential for ‘localism’ to improve water governance through increased social learning and institutional integration. We argue that localism can provide a bridge between policy-makers and policy-implementers, as long as there is sufficient capacity to effectively engage. Following the work of Orsini [2013. “Multi-Forum Non-State Actors: Navigating the Regime Complexes for Forestry and Genetic Resources.” Global Environmental Politics 13 (3): 34–55], we consider that this capacity is influenced by the availability of ‘power resources’; namely material, ideational and organizational power. Using a conceptual framework combining power resources and localism strategies, two examples of localism in the implementation of the Murray–Darling Basin Plan are explored. We find that localism can provide the necessary resources for effective water governance, although consideration of the challenges of localism highlights the need for a mix of localism strategies due to variable resource availability.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)462-481
    Number of pages20
    JournalPolicy Studies
    Volume38
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 3 Sep 2017

    Fingerprint

    governance
    water
    resources
    social learning
    forestry
    regime
    politics
    Values

    Cite this

    @article{5563c551f4c549b9a5adad5d3e67c653,
    title = "Australian water governance in the global context: understanding the benefits of localism",
    abstract = "Effective water governance is essential for sustainable global futures. However, conflicting water values increases tension in water governance, highlighting the need for governance systems able to cope with competing objectives. In this paper, we explore the potential for ‘localism’ to improve water governance through increased social learning and institutional integration. We argue that localism can provide a bridge between policy-makers and policy-implementers, as long as there is sufficient capacity to effectively engage. Following the work of Orsini [2013. “Multi-Forum Non-State Actors: Navigating the Regime Complexes for Forestry and Genetic Resources.” Global Environmental Politics 13 (3): 34–55], we consider that this capacity is influenced by the availability of ‘power resources’; namely material, ideational and organizational power. Using a conceptual framework combining power resources and localism strategies, two examples of localism in the implementation of the Murray–Darling Basin Plan are explored. We find that localism can provide the necessary resources for effective water governance, although consideration of the challenges of localism highlights the need for a mix of localism strategies due to variable resource availability.",
    keywords = "Water governance, localism, natural resource management, power resources",
    author = "Lain DARE and Daniell, {Katherine A.}",
    year = "2017",
    month = "9",
    day = "3",
    doi = "10.1080/01442872.2016.1188908",
    language = "English",
    volume = "38",
    pages = "462--481",
    journal = "Policy Studies",
    issn = "0144-2872",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "5",

    }

    Australian water governance in the global context : understanding the benefits of localism. / DARE, Lain; Daniell, Katherine A.

    In: Policy Studies, Vol. 38, No. 5, 03.09.2017, p. 462-481.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Australian water governance in the global context

    T2 - understanding the benefits of localism

    AU - DARE, Lain

    AU - Daniell, Katherine A.

    PY - 2017/9/3

    Y1 - 2017/9/3

    N2 - Effective water governance is essential for sustainable global futures. However, conflicting water values increases tension in water governance, highlighting the need for governance systems able to cope with competing objectives. In this paper, we explore the potential for ‘localism’ to improve water governance through increased social learning and institutional integration. We argue that localism can provide a bridge between policy-makers and policy-implementers, as long as there is sufficient capacity to effectively engage. Following the work of Orsini [2013. “Multi-Forum Non-State Actors: Navigating the Regime Complexes for Forestry and Genetic Resources.” Global Environmental Politics 13 (3): 34–55], we consider that this capacity is influenced by the availability of ‘power resources’; namely material, ideational and organizational power. Using a conceptual framework combining power resources and localism strategies, two examples of localism in the implementation of the Murray–Darling Basin Plan are explored. We find that localism can provide the necessary resources for effective water governance, although consideration of the challenges of localism highlights the need for a mix of localism strategies due to variable resource availability.

    AB - Effective water governance is essential for sustainable global futures. However, conflicting water values increases tension in water governance, highlighting the need for governance systems able to cope with competing objectives. In this paper, we explore the potential for ‘localism’ to improve water governance through increased social learning and institutional integration. We argue that localism can provide a bridge between policy-makers and policy-implementers, as long as there is sufficient capacity to effectively engage. Following the work of Orsini [2013. “Multi-Forum Non-State Actors: Navigating the Regime Complexes for Forestry and Genetic Resources.” Global Environmental Politics 13 (3): 34–55], we consider that this capacity is influenced by the availability of ‘power resources’; namely material, ideational and organizational power. Using a conceptual framework combining power resources and localism strategies, two examples of localism in the implementation of the Murray–Darling Basin Plan are explored. We find that localism can provide the necessary resources for effective water governance, although consideration of the challenges of localism highlights the need for a mix of localism strategies due to variable resource availability.

    KW - Water governance

    KW - localism

    KW - natural resource management

    KW - power resources

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026518061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/01442872.2016.1188908

    DO - 10.1080/01442872.2016.1188908

    M3 - Article

    VL - 38

    SP - 462

    EP - 481

    JO - Policy Studies

    JF - Policy Studies

    SN - 0144-2872

    IS - 5

    ER -