Australia's no-take marine protected areas: Appropriate conservation or inappropriate management of fishing?

Robert Kearney, C. D. Buxton, G. Farebrother

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    23 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The absence of properly identified mechanisms to adequately protect the marine environment remains a major shortcoming in Australia's commitment to biodiversity conservation. The current commitment to a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA) falls far short of providing adequate protection against the suite of existing and potential threats even though areas are designated as being 'protected'. In this paper it is argued that the actions taken under the NRSMPA are disproportionately concentrated on regulating fishing, including the closing of areas in so-called sanctuary zones to all types of fishing. In the absence of clearly identified threats from most forms of fishing and without assessment of how best to manage those few fishing threats that have been identified, such actions are inefficient and mostly inappropriate. Moreover, they do not provide adequate protection against the full suite of threats to marine environments. Adequate measures for the proper conservation of these areas and/or the protection of marine biodiversity more generally are not being provided and in most cases threats are not even adequately described and evaluated.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1064-1071
    Number of pages8
    JournalMarine Policy
    Volume36
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    fisheries management
    protected area
    conservation areas
    fishing
    conservation
    threat
    marine environment
    management
    biodiversity
    commitment
    sanctuary
    Fishing
    Marine protected areas
    Conservation
    Threat
    Marine environment

    Cite this

    Kearney, Robert ; Buxton, C. D. ; Farebrother, G. . / Australia's no-take marine protected areas: Appropriate conservation or inappropriate management of fishing?. In: Marine Policy. 2012 ; Vol. 36, No. 5. pp. 1064-1071.
    @article{59e06f5c47b9489ba138bf55f4ba1024,
    title = "Australia's no-take marine protected areas: Appropriate conservation or inappropriate management of fishing?",
    abstract = "The absence of properly identified mechanisms to adequately protect the marine environment remains a major shortcoming in Australia's commitment to biodiversity conservation. The current commitment to a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA) falls far short of providing adequate protection against the suite of existing and potential threats even though areas are designated as being 'protected'. In this paper it is argued that the actions taken under the NRSMPA are disproportionately concentrated on regulating fishing, including the closing of areas in so-called sanctuary zones to all types of fishing. In the absence of clearly identified threats from most forms of fishing and without assessment of how best to manage those few fishing threats that have been identified, such actions are inefficient and mostly inappropriate. Moreover, they do not provide adequate protection against the full suite of threats to marine environments. Adequate measures for the proper conservation of these areas and/or the protection of marine biodiversity more generally are not being provided and in most cases threats are not even adequately described and evaluated.",
    keywords = "Marine conservation, Fishery management, Marine protectedareas",
    author = "Robert Kearney and Buxton, {C. D.} and G. Farebrother",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1016/J.MARPOL.2012.02.024",
    language = "English",
    volume = "36",
    pages = "1064--1071",
    journal = "Marine Policy",
    issn = "0308-597X",
    publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
    number = "5",

    }

    Australia's no-take marine protected areas: Appropriate conservation or inappropriate management of fishing? / Kearney, Robert; Buxton, C. D.; Farebrother, G. .

    In: Marine Policy, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2012, p. 1064-1071.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Australia's no-take marine protected areas: Appropriate conservation or inappropriate management of fishing?

    AU - Kearney, Robert

    AU - Buxton, C. D.

    AU - Farebrother, G.

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - The absence of properly identified mechanisms to adequately protect the marine environment remains a major shortcoming in Australia's commitment to biodiversity conservation. The current commitment to a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA) falls far short of providing adequate protection against the suite of existing and potential threats even though areas are designated as being 'protected'. In this paper it is argued that the actions taken under the NRSMPA are disproportionately concentrated on regulating fishing, including the closing of areas in so-called sanctuary zones to all types of fishing. In the absence of clearly identified threats from most forms of fishing and without assessment of how best to manage those few fishing threats that have been identified, such actions are inefficient and mostly inappropriate. Moreover, they do not provide adequate protection against the full suite of threats to marine environments. Adequate measures for the proper conservation of these areas and/or the protection of marine biodiversity more generally are not being provided and in most cases threats are not even adequately described and evaluated.

    AB - The absence of properly identified mechanisms to adequately protect the marine environment remains a major shortcoming in Australia's commitment to biodiversity conservation. The current commitment to a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas (NRSMPA) falls far short of providing adequate protection against the suite of existing and potential threats even though areas are designated as being 'protected'. In this paper it is argued that the actions taken under the NRSMPA are disproportionately concentrated on regulating fishing, including the closing of areas in so-called sanctuary zones to all types of fishing. In the absence of clearly identified threats from most forms of fishing and without assessment of how best to manage those few fishing threats that have been identified, such actions are inefficient and mostly inappropriate. Moreover, they do not provide adequate protection against the full suite of threats to marine environments. Adequate measures for the proper conservation of these areas and/or the protection of marine biodiversity more generally are not being provided and in most cases threats are not even adequately described and evaluated.

    KW - Marine conservation

    KW - Fishery management

    KW - Marine protectedareas

    U2 - 10.1016/J.MARPOL.2012.02.024

    DO - 10.1016/J.MARPOL.2012.02.024

    M3 - Article

    VL - 36

    SP - 1064

    EP - 1071

    JO - Marine Policy

    JF - Marine Policy

    SN - 0308-597X

    IS - 5

    ER -