TY - JOUR
T1 - Authoritarian deliberation revisited
AU - He, Baogang
AU - Wagenaar, Hendrik
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge the financial support of the Australian Research Council.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Cambridge University Press.
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - This introductory paper reviews the origin and development of the concept of authoritarian deliberation, and highlights the importance of culture and cultural tradition associated with public consultation. This paper summarizes and illustrates six key features of authoritarian deliberation in China. First, deliberation in China is a precarious balance between legal rule and state intervention. Second, the Party appeals to public reason to address and manage social conflict, and develop the soft coercion that accompanies much authoritarian deliberation. Third, this highly controlled deliberative process does, however, allow the freedom of local participants to find spaces for democratic expression, and local experiments to develop elements of deliberative democracy. Fourth, authoritarian deliberation is characterized by mutual instrumentalism. Fifth, there is an importance of an administrative and policy perspective in authoritarian deliberation. Six, the concept of authoritarian deliberation is not limited to China. There is the convergence in real-world deliberative process and outcome between authoritarian and liberal democratic systems.
AB - This introductory paper reviews the origin and development of the concept of authoritarian deliberation, and highlights the importance of culture and cultural tradition associated with public consultation. This paper summarizes and illustrates six key features of authoritarian deliberation in China. First, deliberation in China is a precarious balance between legal rule and state intervention. Second, the Party appeals to public reason to address and manage social conflict, and develop the soft coercion that accompanies much authoritarian deliberation. Third, this highly controlled deliberative process does, however, allow the freedom of local participants to find spaces for democratic expression, and local experiments to develop elements of deliberative democracy. Fourth, authoritarian deliberation is characterized by mutual instrumentalism. Fifth, there is an importance of an administrative and policy perspective in authoritarian deliberation. Six, the concept of authoritarian deliberation is not limited to China. There is the convergence in real-world deliberative process and outcome between authoritarian and liberal democratic systems.
KW - Authoritarian deliberation
KW - China
KW - deconstructed democracy
KW - democracy
KW - Governance
KW - local deliberative democracy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056656693&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1468109918000257
DO - 10.1017/S1468109918000257
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85056656693
SN - 1468-1099
VL - 19
SP - 622
EP - 629
JO - Japanese Journal of Political Science
JF - Japanese Journal of Political Science
IS - 4
ER -