Automated speech analysis tools for children’s speech production

A systematic literature review

Jacqui MCKECHNIE, B Ahmed, R Gutierrez-Osuna, P Monroe, P Mccabe, K. J. Ballard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: A systematic search and review of published studies was conducted on the use of automated speech analysis (ASA) tools for analysing and modifying speech of typically-developing children learning a foreign language and children with speech sound disorders to determine (i) types, attributes, and purposes of ASA tools being used; (ii) accuracy against human judgment; and (iii) performance as therapeutic tools. Method: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were applied. Across nine databases, 32 articles published between January 2007 and December 2016 met inclusion criteria: (i) focussed on children’s speech; (ii) tools used for speech analysis or modification; and (iii) reporting quantitative data on accuracy. Result: Eighteen ASA tools were identified. These met the clinical threshold of 80% agreement with human judgment when used as predictors of intelligibility, impairment severity, or error category. Tool accuracy was typically <80% accuracy for words containing mispronunciations. ASA tools have been used effectively to improve to children’s foreign language pronunciation. Conclusion: ASA tools show promise for automated analysis and modification of children’s speech production within assessment and therapeutic applications. Further work is needed to train automated systems with larger samples of speech to increase accuracy for assessment and therapeutic feedback.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)583-598
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume20
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Oct 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Speech Analysis
Speech Production
Literature Review
Child Language
Meta-Analysis
Research Design
Language
Therapeutics
Learning
Databases
Guidelines
Data Base
Intelligibility
Mispronunciations
Impairment
Speech Sound Disorders
Inclusion
Predictors
Systematic Review
Category Error

Cite this

MCKECHNIE, Jacqui ; Ahmed, B ; Gutierrez-Osuna, R ; Monroe, P ; Mccabe, P ; Ballard, K. J. . / Automated speech analysis tools for children’s speech production : A systematic literature review. In: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2018 ; Vol. 20, No. 6. pp. 583-598.
@article{93e9dff9db614bed9c1735424a5068ca,
title = "Automated speech analysis tools for children’s speech production: A systematic literature review",
abstract = "Purpose: A systematic search and review of published studies was conducted on the use of automated speech analysis (ASA) tools for analysing and modifying speech of typically-developing children learning a foreign language and children with speech sound disorders to determine (i) types, attributes, and purposes of ASA tools being used; (ii) accuracy against human judgment; and (iii) performance as therapeutic tools. Method: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were applied. Across nine databases, 32 articles published between January 2007 and December 2016 met inclusion criteria: (i) focussed on children’s speech; (ii) tools used for speech analysis or modification; and (iii) reporting quantitative data on accuracy. Result: Eighteen ASA tools were identified. These met the clinical threshold of 80{\%} agreement with human judgment when used as predictors of intelligibility, impairment severity, or error category. Tool accuracy was typically <80{\%} accuracy for words containing mispronunciations. ASA tools have been used effectively to improve to children’s foreign language pronunciation. Conclusion: ASA tools show promise for automated analysis and modification of children’s speech production within assessment and therapeutic applications. Further work is needed to train automated systems with larger samples of speech to increase accuracy for assessment and therapeutic feedback.",
keywords = "automatic speech recognition, prosody, speech sound disorder",
author = "Jacqui MCKECHNIE and B Ahmed and R Gutierrez-Osuna and P Monroe and P Mccabe and Ballard, {K. J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1080/17549507.2018.1477991",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "583--598",
journal = "International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology",
issn = "1754-9515",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "6",

}

Automated speech analysis tools for children’s speech production : A systematic literature review. / MCKECHNIE, Jacqui; Ahmed, B; Gutierrez-Osuna, R; Monroe, P; Mccabe, P; Ballard, K. J. .

In: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Vol. 20, No. 6, 16.10.2018, p. 583-598.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automated speech analysis tools for children’s speech production

T2 - A systematic literature review

AU - MCKECHNIE, Jacqui

AU - Ahmed, B

AU - Gutierrez-Osuna, R

AU - Monroe, P

AU - Mccabe, P

AU - Ballard, K. J.

PY - 2018/10/16

Y1 - 2018/10/16

N2 - Purpose: A systematic search and review of published studies was conducted on the use of automated speech analysis (ASA) tools for analysing and modifying speech of typically-developing children learning a foreign language and children with speech sound disorders to determine (i) types, attributes, and purposes of ASA tools being used; (ii) accuracy against human judgment; and (iii) performance as therapeutic tools. Method: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were applied. Across nine databases, 32 articles published between January 2007 and December 2016 met inclusion criteria: (i) focussed on children’s speech; (ii) tools used for speech analysis or modification; and (iii) reporting quantitative data on accuracy. Result: Eighteen ASA tools were identified. These met the clinical threshold of 80% agreement with human judgment when used as predictors of intelligibility, impairment severity, or error category. Tool accuracy was typically <80% accuracy for words containing mispronunciations. ASA tools have been used effectively to improve to children’s foreign language pronunciation. Conclusion: ASA tools show promise for automated analysis and modification of children’s speech production within assessment and therapeutic applications. Further work is needed to train automated systems with larger samples of speech to increase accuracy for assessment and therapeutic feedback.

AB - Purpose: A systematic search and review of published studies was conducted on the use of automated speech analysis (ASA) tools for analysing and modifying speech of typically-developing children learning a foreign language and children with speech sound disorders to determine (i) types, attributes, and purposes of ASA tools being used; (ii) accuracy against human judgment; and (iii) performance as therapeutic tools. Method: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were applied. Across nine databases, 32 articles published between January 2007 and December 2016 met inclusion criteria: (i) focussed on children’s speech; (ii) tools used for speech analysis or modification; and (iii) reporting quantitative data on accuracy. Result: Eighteen ASA tools were identified. These met the clinical threshold of 80% agreement with human judgment when used as predictors of intelligibility, impairment severity, or error category. Tool accuracy was typically <80% accuracy for words containing mispronunciations. ASA tools have been used effectively to improve to children’s foreign language pronunciation. Conclusion: ASA tools show promise for automated analysis and modification of children’s speech production within assessment and therapeutic applications. Further work is needed to train automated systems with larger samples of speech to increase accuracy for assessment and therapeutic feedback.

KW - automatic speech recognition

KW - prosody

KW - speech sound disorder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059796759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17549507.2018.1477991

DO - 10.1080/17549507.2018.1477991

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 583

EP - 598

JO - International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

JF - International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

SN - 1754-9515

IS - 6

ER -