Autonomy and Control in Three Australian Capital Territory-based Integrity Agencies

Christopher Aulich

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article discusses the cases of three integrity agencies in one Australian jurisdiction and the means by which control is exercised and autonomy guaranteed. Integrity agencies include audit and ombudsman offices that have checking and vetting responsibilities over other parts of the administrative system. From the cases studied, it was evident that legislative arrangements were formally designed to provide considerable protections for the operational autonomy of all three integrity agencies, but that government control was primarily exercised through the appropriation of agency funds via parliamentary mechanisms. The cases also revealed that control can be, perhaps, more political and unpredictable when the government of the day dominates the parliament and its role in budget appropriation. What also emerged was the importance of other controls such as professional codes of conduct and the significance of securing 'real' autonomy with the development of the reputation, esteem and professional linkages by the integrity agencies themselves
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)49-63
    Number of pages15
    JournalPolicy Studies
    Volume33
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    integrity
    autonomy
    public advocate
    administrative system
    government control
    audit
    reputation
    parliament
    jurisdiction
    budget
    responsibility

    Cite this

    @article{e88e55ab7432404b81dd06325a3bc379,
    title = "Autonomy and Control in Three Australian Capital Territory-based Integrity Agencies",
    abstract = "This article discusses the cases of three integrity agencies in one Australian jurisdiction and the means by which control is exercised and autonomy guaranteed. Integrity agencies include audit and ombudsman offices that have checking and vetting responsibilities over other parts of the administrative system. From the cases studied, it was evident that legislative arrangements were formally designed to provide considerable protections for the operational autonomy of all three integrity agencies, but that government control was primarily exercised through the appropriation of agency funds via parliamentary mechanisms. The cases also revealed that control can be, perhaps, more political and unpredictable when the government of the day dominates the parliament and its role in budget appropriation. What also emerged was the importance of other controls such as professional codes of conduct and the significance of securing 'real' autonomy with the development of the reputation, esteem and professional linkages by the integrity agencies themselves",
    keywords = "Autonomy, Integrity, Public Service",
    author = "Christopher Aulich",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1080/01442872.2011.601203",
    language = "English",
    volume = "33",
    pages = "49--63",
    journal = "Policy Studies",
    issn = "0144-2872",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "1",

    }

    Autonomy and Control in Three Australian Capital Territory-based Integrity Agencies. / Aulich, Christopher.

    In: Policy Studies, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2012, p. 49-63.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Autonomy and Control in Three Australian Capital Territory-based Integrity Agencies

    AU - Aulich, Christopher

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - This article discusses the cases of three integrity agencies in one Australian jurisdiction and the means by which control is exercised and autonomy guaranteed. Integrity agencies include audit and ombudsman offices that have checking and vetting responsibilities over other parts of the administrative system. From the cases studied, it was evident that legislative arrangements were formally designed to provide considerable protections for the operational autonomy of all three integrity agencies, but that government control was primarily exercised through the appropriation of agency funds via parliamentary mechanisms. The cases also revealed that control can be, perhaps, more political and unpredictable when the government of the day dominates the parliament and its role in budget appropriation. What also emerged was the importance of other controls such as professional codes of conduct and the significance of securing 'real' autonomy with the development of the reputation, esteem and professional linkages by the integrity agencies themselves

    AB - This article discusses the cases of three integrity agencies in one Australian jurisdiction and the means by which control is exercised and autonomy guaranteed. Integrity agencies include audit and ombudsman offices that have checking and vetting responsibilities over other parts of the administrative system. From the cases studied, it was evident that legislative arrangements were formally designed to provide considerable protections for the operational autonomy of all three integrity agencies, but that government control was primarily exercised through the appropriation of agency funds via parliamentary mechanisms. The cases also revealed that control can be, perhaps, more political and unpredictable when the government of the day dominates the parliament and its role in budget appropriation. What also emerged was the importance of other controls such as professional codes of conduct and the significance of securing 'real' autonomy with the development of the reputation, esteem and professional linkages by the integrity agencies themselves

    KW - Autonomy

    KW - Integrity

    KW - Public Service

    U2 - 10.1080/01442872.2011.601203

    DO - 10.1080/01442872.2011.601203

    M3 - Article

    VL - 33

    SP - 49

    EP - 63

    JO - Policy Studies

    JF - Policy Studies

    SN - 0144-2872

    IS - 1

    ER -