Bankrupting Terrorism

The Role of US Anti-terrorism Litigation in the Prevention of Terrorism and Other Hybrid Threats: A Legal Assessment and Outlook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Global terrorist networks are dependent on receiving financial support from a variety of sources, including individuals, charities and corporations. Also known as terrorist financing, the potential of terrorism finance to resemble a global threat has been recognised and also its closeness to other international crimes such as money laundering and organized crime. As a result, possible responses have to constitute co-ordinated, multi-lateral and multi faceted actions under the umbrella of a wide range of international stakeholders such as the United Nations Security Council and the Financial Action Task Force. Combating terrorism requires a 'holistic' approach which allows for a mix of possible responses. Besides "kinetic" security operations (such as targeted killings) and the adoption of criminal prosecution measures another possible response could be the use of US styled transnational civil litigation by victims of terrorism against both, terrorist groups and their sponsors. Corporations, both profit and non profit, such as banks and other legal entities, as well as individuals, are often complicit in international terrorism in a role of aiders and abettors by providing financial assistance to the perpetrators (cf. UN Al-Qaida Sanctions List: The List established and maintained by the 1267 Committee with respect to individuals, groups, undertakings and other entities associated with Al-Qaida). Such collusion in acts of terrorism gains additional importance against the background of so called "Hybrid Threats", NATO's new concept of identifying and countering new threats arising from multi-level threat scenarios. This article discusses the potential impact of US terrorism lawsuits for the global fight against terrorism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-109
Number of pages19
JournalLiverpool Law Review
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

terrorism
threat
corporation
UNO
fight against terrorism
legal entity
money laundering
financial assistance
organized crime
lawsuit
holistic approach
NATO
prosecution
sanction
bank
finance
profit
Group
stakeholder
offense

Cite this

@article{792909f42443447683a7b557fa2d6101,
title = "Bankrupting Terrorism: The Role of US Anti-terrorism Litigation in the Prevention of Terrorism and Other Hybrid Threats: A Legal Assessment and Outlook",
abstract = "Global terrorist networks are dependent on receiving financial support from a variety of sources, including individuals, charities and corporations. Also known as terrorist financing, the potential of terrorism finance to resemble a global threat has been recognised and also its closeness to other international crimes such as money laundering and organized crime. As a result, possible responses have to constitute co-ordinated, multi-lateral and multi faceted actions under the umbrella of a wide range of international stakeholders such as the United Nations Security Council and the Financial Action Task Force. Combating terrorism requires a 'holistic' approach which allows for a mix of possible responses. Besides {"}kinetic{"} security operations (such as targeted killings) and the adoption of criminal prosecution measures another possible response could be the use of US styled transnational civil litigation by victims of terrorism against both, terrorist groups and their sponsors. Corporations, both profit and non profit, such as banks and other legal entities, as well as individuals, are often complicit in international terrorism in a role of aiders and abettors by providing financial assistance to the perpetrators (cf. UN Al-Qaida Sanctions List: The List established and maintained by the 1267 Committee with respect to individuals, groups, undertakings and other entities associated with Al-Qaida). Such collusion in acts of terrorism gains additional importance against the background of so called {"}Hybrid Threats{"}, NATO's new concept of identifying and countering new threats arising from multi-level threat scenarios. This article discusses the potential impact of US terrorism lawsuits for the global fight against terrorism.",
keywords = "Aiding and abetting responsibility, Bankrupting terrorism, Hybrid threats, Terrorist finance, US Alien Tort Statute, US transnational litigation",
author = "Bachmann, {Sascha Dominik}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1007/s10991-012-9115-7",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "91--109",
journal = "Liverpool Law Review",
issn = "0144-932X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bankrupting Terrorism

T2 - The Role of US Anti-terrorism Litigation in the Prevention of Terrorism and Other Hybrid Threats: A Legal Assessment and Outlook

AU - Bachmann, Sascha Dominik

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Global terrorist networks are dependent on receiving financial support from a variety of sources, including individuals, charities and corporations. Also known as terrorist financing, the potential of terrorism finance to resemble a global threat has been recognised and also its closeness to other international crimes such as money laundering and organized crime. As a result, possible responses have to constitute co-ordinated, multi-lateral and multi faceted actions under the umbrella of a wide range of international stakeholders such as the United Nations Security Council and the Financial Action Task Force. Combating terrorism requires a 'holistic' approach which allows for a mix of possible responses. Besides "kinetic" security operations (such as targeted killings) and the adoption of criminal prosecution measures another possible response could be the use of US styled transnational civil litigation by victims of terrorism against both, terrorist groups and their sponsors. Corporations, both profit and non profit, such as banks and other legal entities, as well as individuals, are often complicit in international terrorism in a role of aiders and abettors by providing financial assistance to the perpetrators (cf. UN Al-Qaida Sanctions List: The List established and maintained by the 1267 Committee with respect to individuals, groups, undertakings and other entities associated with Al-Qaida). Such collusion in acts of terrorism gains additional importance against the background of so called "Hybrid Threats", NATO's new concept of identifying and countering new threats arising from multi-level threat scenarios. This article discusses the potential impact of US terrorism lawsuits for the global fight against terrorism.

AB - Global terrorist networks are dependent on receiving financial support from a variety of sources, including individuals, charities and corporations. Also known as terrorist financing, the potential of terrorism finance to resemble a global threat has been recognised and also its closeness to other international crimes such as money laundering and organized crime. As a result, possible responses have to constitute co-ordinated, multi-lateral and multi faceted actions under the umbrella of a wide range of international stakeholders such as the United Nations Security Council and the Financial Action Task Force. Combating terrorism requires a 'holistic' approach which allows for a mix of possible responses. Besides "kinetic" security operations (such as targeted killings) and the adoption of criminal prosecution measures another possible response could be the use of US styled transnational civil litigation by victims of terrorism against both, terrorist groups and their sponsors. Corporations, both profit and non profit, such as banks and other legal entities, as well as individuals, are often complicit in international terrorism in a role of aiders and abettors by providing financial assistance to the perpetrators (cf. UN Al-Qaida Sanctions List: The List established and maintained by the 1267 Committee with respect to individuals, groups, undertakings and other entities associated with Al-Qaida). Such collusion in acts of terrorism gains additional importance against the background of so called "Hybrid Threats", NATO's new concept of identifying and countering new threats arising from multi-level threat scenarios. This article discusses the potential impact of US terrorism lawsuits for the global fight against terrorism.

KW - Aiding and abetting responsibility

KW - Bankrupting terrorism

KW - Hybrid threats

KW - Terrorist finance

KW - US Alien Tort Statute

KW - US transnational litigation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867335396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10991-012-9115-7

DO - 10.1007/s10991-012-9115-7

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 91

EP - 109

JO - Liverpool Law Review

JF - Liverpool Law Review

SN - 0144-932X

IS - 2

ER -