TY - JOUR
T1 - Barriers to evidence-based acute stroke care in Ghana
T2 - A qualitative study on the perspectives of stroke care professionals
AU - Baatiema, Leonard
AU - De-Graft Aikins, Ama
AU - Sav, Adem
AU - Mnatzaganian, George
AU - Chan, Carina K.Y.
AU - Somerset, Shawn
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - Objective: Despite major advances in research on acute stroke care interventions, relatively few stroke patients benefit from evidence-based care due to multiple barriers. Yet current evidence of such barriers is predominantly from high-income countries. This study seeks to understand stroke care professionals' views on the barriers which hinder the provision of optimal acute stroke care in Ghanaian hospital settings. Design: A qualitative approach using semistructured interviews. Both thematic and grounded theory approaches were used to analyse and interpret the data through a synthesis of preidentified and emergent themes. Setting: A multisite study, conducted in six major referral acute hospital settings (three teaching and three non-teaching regional hospitals) in Ghana. Participants: A total of 40 participants comprising neurologists, emergency physician specialists, non-specialist medical doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical psychologists and a dietitian. Results: Four key barriers and 12 subthemes of barriers were identified. These include barriers at the patient (financial constraints, delays, sociocultural or religious practices, discharge against medical advice, denial of stroke), health system (inadequate medical facilities, lack of stroke care protocol, limited staff numbers, inadequate staff development opportunities), health professionals (poor collaboration, limited knowledge of stroke care interventions) and broader national health policy (lack of political will) levels. Perceived barriers varied across health professional disciplines and hospitals. Conclusion: Barriers from low/middle-income countries differ substantially from those in high-income countries. For evidence-based acute stroke care in low/middle-income countries such as Ghana, health policy-makers and hospital managers need to consider the contrasts and uniqueness in these barriers in designing quality improvement interventions to optimise patient outcomes.
AB - Objective: Despite major advances in research on acute stroke care interventions, relatively few stroke patients benefit from evidence-based care due to multiple barriers. Yet current evidence of such barriers is predominantly from high-income countries. This study seeks to understand stroke care professionals' views on the barriers which hinder the provision of optimal acute stroke care in Ghanaian hospital settings. Design: A qualitative approach using semistructured interviews. Both thematic and grounded theory approaches were used to analyse and interpret the data through a synthesis of preidentified and emergent themes. Setting: A multisite study, conducted in six major referral acute hospital settings (three teaching and three non-teaching regional hospitals) in Ghana. Participants: A total of 40 participants comprising neurologists, emergency physician specialists, non-specialist medical doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical psychologists and a dietitian. Results: Four key barriers and 12 subthemes of barriers were identified. These include barriers at the patient (financial constraints, delays, sociocultural or religious practices, discharge against medical advice, denial of stroke), health system (inadequate medical facilities, lack of stroke care protocol, limited staff numbers, inadequate staff development opportunities), health professionals (poor collaboration, limited knowledge of stroke care interventions) and broader national health policy (lack of political will) levels. Perceived barriers varied across health professional disciplines and hospitals. Conclusion: Barriers from low/middle-income countries differ substantially from those in high-income countries. For evidence-based acute stroke care in low/middle-income countries such as Ghana, health policy-makers and hospital managers need to consider the contrasts and uniqueness in these barriers in designing quality improvement interventions to optimise patient outcomes.
KW - Africa
KW - barriers
KW - Developing countries
KW - Evidence-based practice
KW - Implementation
KW - Stroke care
KW - Stroke service
KW - Attitude of Health Personnel
KW - Humans
KW - Ghana
KW - Evidence-Based Practice/methods
KW - Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data
KW - Stroke/therapy
KW - Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - Qualitative Research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018752704&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015385
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015385
M3 - Article
C2 - 28450468
AN - SCOPUS:85018752704
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 7
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 4
M1 - e015385
ER -