Battlefield or gallery? A comparative analysis of contemporary mark-making practices in Sydney, Australia

Andrew Crisp, Anne Clarke, Ursula K. Frederick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)


In this paper we present an analysis of the differences and similarities in the spatial distribution of graffiti in two Sydney suburbs: Newtown and Miranda. The research examines the extent to which factors of surveillance, location and legislation affect the range, production and spatial distribution of graffiti. Through the application of conventional archaeological field methods to the contemporary landscape this study has shown how an archaeological approach can test, and thereby validate or refute, general assumptions and proposals generated through other disciplinary frameworks. Results show that the amount of graffiti across the landscape does not follow the simple distinction whereby high visibility locations have low amounts of graffiti, while secluded locations have high amounts. Rather, within each landscape, the intricate interactions of human intention, graffiti policy and the characteristics of the built environment differentially shape graffiti distribution. Furthermore, this study shows that the influence of local community approaches to graffiti management on the typology and distribution of graffiti cannot be underestimated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-92
Number of pages9
JournalAustralian Archaeology
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Battlefield or gallery? A comparative analysis of contemporary mark-making practices in Sydney, Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this