Bayesian Estimation of Small Effects in Exercise and Sports Science

Kerrie Mengersen, Christopher Drovandi, Christian Robert, David Pyne, Christopher Gore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to provide a Bayesian formulation of the so-called magnitude-based inference approach to quantifying and interpreting effects, and in a case study example provide accurate probabilistic statements that correspond to the intended magnitude-based inferences. The model is described in the context of a published small-scale athlete study which employed a magnitude-based inference approach to compare the effect of two altitude training regimens (live high-train low (LHTL), and intermittent hypoxic exposure (IHE)) on running performance and blood measurements of elite triathletes. The posterior distributions, and corresponding point and interval estimates, for the parameters and associated effects and comparisons of interest, were estimated using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations. The Bayesian analysis was shown to provide more direct probabilistic comparisons of treatments and able to identify small effects of interest. The approach avoided asymptotic assumptions and overcame issues such as multiple testing. Bayesian analysis of unscaled effects showed a probability of 0.96 that LHTL yields a substantially greater increase in hemoglobin mass than IHE, a 0.93 probability of a substantially greater improvement in running economy and a greater than 0.96 probability that both IHE and LHTL yield a substantially greater improvement in maximum blood lactate concentration compared to a Placebo. The conclusions are consistent with those obtained using a 'magnitude-based inference' approach that has been promoted in the field. The paper demonstrates that a fully Bayesian analysis is a simple and effective way of analysing small effects, providing a rich set of results that are straightforward to interpret in terms of probabilistic statements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalPLoS One
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Bayes Theorem
Bayesian theory
Sports
sports
exercise
Exercise
Blood
Markov Chains
athletes
blood
Running
Athletes
Markov processes
placebos
lactates
Lactic Acid
hemoglobin
Hemoglobins
Placebos
case studies

Cite this

Mengersen, Kerrie ; Drovandi, Christopher ; Robert, Christian ; Pyne, David ; Gore, Christopher. / Bayesian Estimation of Small Effects in Exercise and Sports Science. In: PLoS One. 2016 ; Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 1-23.
@article{dcf5ed0bdb624091a7975cd60bc85a0a,
title = "Bayesian Estimation of Small Effects in Exercise and Sports Science",
abstract = "The aim of this paper is to provide a Bayesian formulation of the so-called magnitude-based inference approach to quantifying and interpreting effects, and in a case study example provide accurate probabilistic statements that correspond to the intended magnitude-based inferences. The model is described in the context of a published small-scale athlete study which employed a magnitude-based inference approach to compare the effect of two altitude training regimens (live high-train low (LHTL), and intermittent hypoxic exposure (IHE)) on running performance and blood measurements of elite triathletes. The posterior distributions, and corresponding point and interval estimates, for the parameters and associated effects and comparisons of interest, were estimated using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations. The Bayesian analysis was shown to provide more direct probabilistic comparisons of treatments and able to identify small effects of interest. The approach avoided asymptotic assumptions and overcame issues such as multiple testing. Bayesian analysis of unscaled effects showed a probability of 0.96 that LHTL yields a substantially greater increase in hemoglobin mass than IHE, a 0.93 probability of a substantially greater improvement in running economy and a greater than 0.96 probability that both IHE and LHTL yield a substantially greater improvement in maximum blood lactate concentration compared to a Placebo. The conclusions are consistent with those obtained using a 'magnitude-based inference' approach that has been promoted in the field. The paper demonstrates that a fully Bayesian analysis is a simple and effective way of analysing small effects, providing a rich set of results that are straightforward to interpret in terms of probabilistic statements.",
keywords = "Bayes Theorem, Exercise, Humans, Models, Biological, Sports, Sports Medicine, Journal Article",
author = "Kerrie Mengersen and Christopher Drovandi and Christian Robert and David Pyne and Christopher Gore",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0147311",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "1--23",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "4",

}

Bayesian Estimation of Small Effects in Exercise and Sports Science. / Mengersen, Kerrie; Drovandi, Christopher; Robert, Christian; Pyne, David; Gore, Christopher.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2016, p. 1-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bayesian Estimation of Small Effects in Exercise and Sports Science

AU - Mengersen, Kerrie

AU - Drovandi, Christopher

AU - Robert, Christian

AU - Pyne, David

AU - Gore, Christopher

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The aim of this paper is to provide a Bayesian formulation of the so-called magnitude-based inference approach to quantifying and interpreting effects, and in a case study example provide accurate probabilistic statements that correspond to the intended magnitude-based inferences. The model is described in the context of a published small-scale athlete study which employed a magnitude-based inference approach to compare the effect of two altitude training regimens (live high-train low (LHTL), and intermittent hypoxic exposure (IHE)) on running performance and blood measurements of elite triathletes. The posterior distributions, and corresponding point and interval estimates, for the parameters and associated effects and comparisons of interest, were estimated using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations. The Bayesian analysis was shown to provide more direct probabilistic comparisons of treatments and able to identify small effects of interest. The approach avoided asymptotic assumptions and overcame issues such as multiple testing. Bayesian analysis of unscaled effects showed a probability of 0.96 that LHTL yields a substantially greater increase in hemoglobin mass than IHE, a 0.93 probability of a substantially greater improvement in running economy and a greater than 0.96 probability that both IHE and LHTL yield a substantially greater improvement in maximum blood lactate concentration compared to a Placebo. The conclusions are consistent with those obtained using a 'magnitude-based inference' approach that has been promoted in the field. The paper demonstrates that a fully Bayesian analysis is a simple and effective way of analysing small effects, providing a rich set of results that are straightforward to interpret in terms of probabilistic statements.

AB - The aim of this paper is to provide a Bayesian formulation of the so-called magnitude-based inference approach to quantifying and interpreting effects, and in a case study example provide accurate probabilistic statements that correspond to the intended magnitude-based inferences. The model is described in the context of a published small-scale athlete study which employed a magnitude-based inference approach to compare the effect of two altitude training regimens (live high-train low (LHTL), and intermittent hypoxic exposure (IHE)) on running performance and blood measurements of elite triathletes. The posterior distributions, and corresponding point and interval estimates, for the parameters and associated effects and comparisons of interest, were estimated using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations. The Bayesian analysis was shown to provide more direct probabilistic comparisons of treatments and able to identify small effects of interest. The approach avoided asymptotic assumptions and overcame issues such as multiple testing. Bayesian analysis of unscaled effects showed a probability of 0.96 that LHTL yields a substantially greater increase in hemoglobin mass than IHE, a 0.93 probability of a substantially greater improvement in running economy and a greater than 0.96 probability that both IHE and LHTL yield a substantially greater improvement in maximum blood lactate concentration compared to a Placebo. The conclusions are consistent with those obtained using a 'magnitude-based inference' approach that has been promoted in the field. The paper demonstrates that a fully Bayesian analysis is a simple and effective way of analysing small effects, providing a rich set of results that are straightforward to interpret in terms of probabilistic statements.

KW - Bayes Theorem

KW - Exercise

KW - Humans

KW - Models, Biological

KW - Sports

KW - Sports Medicine

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0147311

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0147311

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 4

ER -