Bedside review of patient care in an emergency department

The Cow Round

Clare Richmond, Eamon Merrick, Timothy Green, Michael Dinh, Rick Iedema

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Clinical handover is a critical point in medical care in the ED, which can contribute to adverse effects for patient care and staff workloads. Over a 4 and a half months in a tertiary referral hospital ED, a centralized whiteboard handover was performed followed by a multidisciplinary review of each patient. This round was referred to as the 'Cow Round'. Methodology: This observational study used a standardized feedback survey of clinicians leading each Cow Round. The survey asked participants in the round to report issues found, which were not handed over during the centralized whiteboard handover. Data were analysed for the number of issues identified, the type of issue identified, and to determine if there was a relationship between the number of issues reported and patients in the department. Results: 204 surveys met inclusion criteria. Clinical issues not handed over at the standard whiteboard round were found in 64% of Cow Rounds. Of the 2411 patients reviewed on Cow Rounds, 14.1% had at least one clinical issue not handed over during the whiteboard round. A mean of 2.2 issues per round (95% CI 1.9-2.5) were found. Pearson correlation found a relationship between the number of issues identified and the total number of patients in the department (r= 0.246 P= 0.005). Conclusion: Review of patients led by a senior member of medical staff, at the patient bedside enables the timely identification and management of issues not communicated during the whiteboard handover process. This review is important when more patients are receiving treatment in the department.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)600-605
Number of pages6
JournalEmergency Medicine Australasia (Print)
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Patient Care
Patient Handoff
Medical Staff
Workload
Tertiary Care Centers
Observational Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Richmond, Clare ; Merrick, Eamon ; Green, Timothy ; Dinh, Michael ; Iedema, Rick. / Bedside review of patient care in an emergency department : The Cow Round. In: Emergency Medicine Australasia (Print). 2011 ; Vol. 23, No. 5. pp. 600-605.
@article{aa52c230aa534041b95c5e049690c882,
title = "Bedside review of patient care in an emergency department: The Cow Round",
abstract = "Objective: Clinical handover is a critical point in medical care in the ED, which can contribute to adverse effects for patient care and staff workloads. Over a 4 and a half months in a tertiary referral hospital ED, a centralized whiteboard handover was performed followed by a multidisciplinary review of each patient. This round was referred to as the 'Cow Round'. Methodology: This observational study used a standardized feedback survey of clinicians leading each Cow Round. The survey asked participants in the round to report issues found, which were not handed over during the centralized whiteboard handover. Data were analysed for the number of issues identified, the type of issue identified, and to determine if there was a relationship between the number of issues reported and patients in the department. Results: 204 surveys met inclusion criteria. Clinical issues not handed over at the standard whiteboard round were found in 64{\%} of Cow Rounds. Of the 2411 patients reviewed on Cow Rounds, 14.1{\%} had at least one clinical issue not handed over during the whiteboard round. A mean of 2.2 issues per round (95{\%} CI 1.9-2.5) were found. Pearson correlation found a relationship between the number of issues identified and the total number of patients in the department (r= 0.246 P= 0.005). Conclusion: Review of patients led by a senior member of medical staff, at the patient bedside enables the timely identification and management of issues not communicated during the whiteboard handover process. This review is important when more patients are receiving treatment in the department.",
keywords = "Clinical handover, Emergency medicine, Medical error",
author = "Clare Richmond and Eamon Merrick and Timothy Green and Michael Dinh and Rick Iedema",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01440.x",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "600--605",
journal = "EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia",
issn = "1742-6723",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

Bedside review of patient care in an emergency department : The Cow Round. / Richmond, Clare; Merrick, Eamon; Green, Timothy; Dinh, Michael; Iedema, Rick.

In: Emergency Medicine Australasia (Print), Vol. 23, No. 5, 10.2011, p. 600-605.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bedside review of patient care in an emergency department

T2 - The Cow Round

AU - Richmond, Clare

AU - Merrick, Eamon

AU - Green, Timothy

AU - Dinh, Michael

AU - Iedema, Rick

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - Objective: Clinical handover is a critical point in medical care in the ED, which can contribute to adverse effects for patient care and staff workloads. Over a 4 and a half months in a tertiary referral hospital ED, a centralized whiteboard handover was performed followed by a multidisciplinary review of each patient. This round was referred to as the 'Cow Round'. Methodology: This observational study used a standardized feedback survey of clinicians leading each Cow Round. The survey asked participants in the round to report issues found, which were not handed over during the centralized whiteboard handover. Data were analysed for the number of issues identified, the type of issue identified, and to determine if there was a relationship between the number of issues reported and patients in the department. Results: 204 surveys met inclusion criteria. Clinical issues not handed over at the standard whiteboard round were found in 64% of Cow Rounds. Of the 2411 patients reviewed on Cow Rounds, 14.1% had at least one clinical issue not handed over during the whiteboard round. A mean of 2.2 issues per round (95% CI 1.9-2.5) were found. Pearson correlation found a relationship between the number of issues identified and the total number of patients in the department (r= 0.246 P= 0.005). Conclusion: Review of patients led by a senior member of medical staff, at the patient bedside enables the timely identification and management of issues not communicated during the whiteboard handover process. This review is important when more patients are receiving treatment in the department.

AB - Objective: Clinical handover is a critical point in medical care in the ED, which can contribute to adverse effects for patient care and staff workloads. Over a 4 and a half months in a tertiary referral hospital ED, a centralized whiteboard handover was performed followed by a multidisciplinary review of each patient. This round was referred to as the 'Cow Round'. Methodology: This observational study used a standardized feedback survey of clinicians leading each Cow Round. The survey asked participants in the round to report issues found, which were not handed over during the centralized whiteboard handover. Data were analysed for the number of issues identified, the type of issue identified, and to determine if there was a relationship between the number of issues reported and patients in the department. Results: 204 surveys met inclusion criteria. Clinical issues not handed over at the standard whiteboard round were found in 64% of Cow Rounds. Of the 2411 patients reviewed on Cow Rounds, 14.1% had at least one clinical issue not handed over during the whiteboard round. A mean of 2.2 issues per round (95% CI 1.9-2.5) were found. Pearson correlation found a relationship between the number of issues identified and the total number of patients in the department (r= 0.246 P= 0.005). Conclusion: Review of patients led by a senior member of medical staff, at the patient bedside enables the timely identification and management of issues not communicated during the whiteboard handover process. This review is important when more patients are receiving treatment in the department.

KW - Clinical handover

KW - Emergency medicine

KW - Medical error

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054078659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01440.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01440.x

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 600

EP - 605

JO - EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia

JF - EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia

SN - 1742-6723

IS - 5

ER -