Benchmarking the Competitiveness of Australian Global Cities: Sydney and Melbourne in the Global Context

Richard HU, Edward Blakely, Yimin Zhou

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    18 Citations (Scopus)
    6 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In this article, we construct an integrative model of urban competitiveness, which incorporates economic and non-economic dimensions, and combines determinants and indicators of a city's competitiveness. We apply this model to evaluating the competitiveness of Australian cities (Sydney and Melbourne), benchmarked against a group of counterpart global cities (New York, London, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Toronto, Frankfurt, Hong Kong, Singapore and Shanghai). The results reveal the global status of the Australian cities, and point out their competitive strength in the dimensions of Liveability and Attractiveness, Creativity and Diversity, and Environmental Sustainability, and competitive weakness in the dimensions of Governance, Connectivity and Enterprise Hub. We conclude with a discussion about enhancing the competitiveness of Australian global cities.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)435-452
    Number of pages18
    JournalUrban Policy and Research
    Volume31
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    world city
    benchmarking
    competitiveness
    social attraction
    Singapore
    creativity
    connectivity
    Hong Kong
    sustainability
    determinants
    governance
    economics
    city
    Group

    Cite this

    @article{b607f6fe70744125a1eac4b3cb3dbdd5,
    title = "Benchmarking the Competitiveness of Australian Global Cities: Sydney and Melbourne in the Global Context",
    abstract = "In this article, we construct an integrative model of urban competitiveness, which incorporates economic and non-economic dimensions, and combines determinants and indicators of a city's competitiveness. We apply this model to evaluating the competitiveness of Australian cities (Sydney and Melbourne), benchmarked against a group of counterpart global cities (New York, London, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Toronto, Frankfurt, Hong Kong, Singapore and Shanghai). The results reveal the global status of the Australian cities, and point out their competitive strength in the dimensions of Liveability and Attractiveness, Creativity and Diversity, and Environmental Sustainability, and competitive weakness in the dimensions of Governance, Connectivity and Enterprise Hub. We conclude with a discussion about enhancing the competitiveness of Australian global cities.",
    keywords = "Urban competitiveness, global cities, Sydney, Melbourne",
    author = "Richard HU and Edward Blakely and Yimin Zhou",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1080/08111146.2013.832667",
    language = "English",
    volume = "31",
    pages = "435--452",
    journal = "Urban Policy and Research",
    issn = "0811-1146",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "4",

    }

    Benchmarking the Competitiveness of Australian Global Cities: Sydney and Melbourne in the Global Context. / HU, Richard; Blakely, Edward; Zhou, Yimin.

    In: Urban Policy and Research, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2013, p. 435-452.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Benchmarking the Competitiveness of Australian Global Cities: Sydney and Melbourne in the Global Context

    AU - HU, Richard

    AU - Blakely, Edward

    AU - Zhou, Yimin

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - In this article, we construct an integrative model of urban competitiveness, which incorporates economic and non-economic dimensions, and combines determinants and indicators of a city's competitiveness. We apply this model to evaluating the competitiveness of Australian cities (Sydney and Melbourne), benchmarked against a group of counterpart global cities (New York, London, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Toronto, Frankfurt, Hong Kong, Singapore and Shanghai). The results reveal the global status of the Australian cities, and point out their competitive strength in the dimensions of Liveability and Attractiveness, Creativity and Diversity, and Environmental Sustainability, and competitive weakness in the dimensions of Governance, Connectivity and Enterprise Hub. We conclude with a discussion about enhancing the competitiveness of Australian global cities.

    AB - In this article, we construct an integrative model of urban competitiveness, which incorporates economic and non-economic dimensions, and combines determinants and indicators of a city's competitiveness. We apply this model to evaluating the competitiveness of Australian cities (Sydney and Melbourne), benchmarked against a group of counterpart global cities (New York, London, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Toronto, Frankfurt, Hong Kong, Singapore and Shanghai). The results reveal the global status of the Australian cities, and point out their competitive strength in the dimensions of Liveability and Attractiveness, Creativity and Diversity, and Environmental Sustainability, and competitive weakness in the dimensions of Governance, Connectivity and Enterprise Hub. We conclude with a discussion about enhancing the competitiveness of Australian global cities.

    KW - Urban competitiveness

    KW - global cities

    KW - Sydney

    KW - Melbourne

    U2 - 10.1080/08111146.2013.832667

    DO - 10.1080/08111146.2013.832667

    M3 - Article

    VL - 31

    SP - 435

    EP - 452

    JO - Urban Policy and Research

    JF - Urban Policy and Research

    SN - 0811-1146

    IS - 4

    ER -