Between environmental and ecological democracy: theory and practice at the democracy-environment nexus

Jonathan Pickering, Karin Backstrand, David Schlosberg

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

72 Citations (Scopus)
169 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Concepts of ecological and environmental democracy seek to reconcile two normative ideals: ensuring environmental sustainability while safeguarding democracy. These ideals are frequently conceived as being in conflict, as democracy is perceived as too slow and cumbersome to deliver the urgent large-scale collective action needed to tackle environmental problems. Theories addressing the democracy-environment nexus can be situated on a spectrum from theories of ecological democracy that are more critical of existing liberal democratic institutions to theories of environmental democracy that call for reforming rather than radically transforming or dismantling those institutions. This article reviews theoretical and empirical scholarship on the democracy-environment nexus. We find continued theoretical and empirical diversity in the field, as well as vibrant debates on democratising global environmental politics, local material practices, and non-human representation. We argue for stronger dialogue between environmental political theory and empirical, policy-oriented research on democracy and sustainability, as well as further exploration of complementarities between ecological and environmental democracy. We identify four main areas of challenge and opportunity for theory and practice: public participation and populism; technocracy and expertise; governance across scales; and ecological rights and limits.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Environmental Policy and Planning
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Between environmental and ecological democracy: theory and practice at the democracy-environment nexus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this