TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond codes of ethics
T2 - how library and information professionals navigate ethical dilemmas in a complex and dynamic information environment
AU - FERGUSON, Stuart
AU - Thornley, Clare
AU - Gibb, Forbes
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - This paper reports on a research project that investigated how library and information (LIS) professionals experience ethical dilemmas, with particular reference to the impact of new technologies, sources used to assist ethical decision-making, and the contribution case studies can make to ethical understanding and decision-making. Data was collected through interviews in Britain, Ireland and Australia with LIS professionals, educators, and representatives of professional bodies. The findings identify the main types of dilemma raised and discuss cases indicative of each type. They suggest that new technologies do not appear to change ethical principles but, when experienced in the workplace, substantially change the factors the professional has to evaluate. They also suggest that relevant codes of ethics are satisfactory on traditional library issues of access and confidentiality, but do not address the ethical challenges of current and potential digital environments. Professional associations appear more familiar with codes of ethics than practitioners although practitioners show high levels of ethical awareness, suggesting associations need to communicate more with their members and provide tools that are more useful in the workplace. Case studies are seen as a good way to educate and engage practitioners because of the complexity, conflicts and dynamism they can present.
AB - This paper reports on a research project that investigated how library and information (LIS) professionals experience ethical dilemmas, with particular reference to the impact of new technologies, sources used to assist ethical decision-making, and the contribution case studies can make to ethical understanding and decision-making. Data was collected through interviews in Britain, Ireland and Australia with LIS professionals, educators, and representatives of professional bodies. The findings identify the main types of dilemma raised and discuss cases indicative of each type. They suggest that new technologies do not appear to change ethical principles but, when experienced in the workplace, substantially change the factors the professional has to evaluate. They also suggest that relevant codes of ethics are satisfactory on traditional library issues of access and confidentiality, but do not address the ethical challenges of current and potential digital environments. Professional associations appear more familiar with codes of ethics than practitioners although practitioners show high levels of ethical awareness, suggesting associations need to communicate more with their members and provide tools that are more useful in the workplace. Case studies are seen as a good way to educate and engage practitioners because of the complexity, conflicts and dynamism they can present.
KW - Information ethics
KW - Library ethics
KW - Codes of ethics
KW - ICT Digital transition
KW - Case studies
KW - ICT
KW - Digital transition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961843616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/beyond-codes-ethics-library-information-professionals-navigate-ethical-dilemmas-complex-dynamic-info
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.02.012
DO - 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.02.012
M3 - Article
SN - 0268-4012
VL - 36
SP - 543
EP - 556
JO - International Journal of Information Management
JF - International Journal of Information Management
IS - 4
ER -