Beyond codes of ethics: How library and information professionals navigate ethical dilemmas in a complex and dynamic information environment

Stuart FERGUSON, Clare Thornley, Forbes Gibb

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper reports on a research project that investigated how library and information (LIS) professionals experience ethical dilemmas, with particular reference to the impact of new technologies, sources used to assist ethical decision-making, and the contribution case studies can make to ethical understanding and decision-making. Data was collected through interviews in Britain, Ireland and Australia with LIS professionals, educators, and representatives of professional bodies. The findings identify the main types of dilemma raised and discuss cases indicative of each type. They suggest that new technologies do not appear to change ethical principles but, when experienced in the workplace, substantially change the factors the professional has to evaluate. They also suggest that relevant codes of ethics are satisfactory on traditional library issues of access and confidentiality, but do not address the ethical challenges of current and potential digital environments. Professional associations appear more familiar with codes of ethics than practitioners although practitioners show high levels of ethical awareness, suggesting associations need to communicate more with their members and provide tools that are more useful in the workplace. Case studies are seen as a good way to educate and engage practitioners because of the complexity, conflicts and dynamism they can present.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)543-556
    Number of pages14
    JournalInternational Journal of Information Management
    Volume36
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    new technology
    workplace
    Decision making
    moral philosophy
    decision making
    professional experience
    dynamism
    professional association
    Ireland
    research project
    educator
    interview

    Cite this

    @article{8856b9ae399542a1a13b3c049aa9f9c2,
    title = "Beyond codes of ethics: How library and information professionals navigate ethical dilemmas in a complex and dynamic information environment",
    abstract = "This paper reports on a research project that investigated how library and information (LIS) professionals experience ethical dilemmas, with particular reference to the impact of new technologies, sources used to assist ethical decision-making, and the contribution case studies can make to ethical understanding and decision-making. Data was collected through interviews in Britain, Ireland and Australia with LIS professionals, educators, and representatives of professional bodies. The findings identify the main types of dilemma raised and discuss cases indicative of each type. They suggest that new technologies do not appear to change ethical principles but, when experienced in the workplace, substantially change the factors the professional has to evaluate. They also suggest that relevant codes of ethics are satisfactory on traditional library issues of access and confidentiality, but do not address the ethical challenges of current and potential digital environments. Professional associations appear more familiar with codes of ethics than practitioners although practitioners show high levels of ethical awareness, suggesting associations need to communicate more with their members and provide tools that are more useful in the workplace. Case studies are seen as a good way to educate and engage practitioners because of the complexity, conflicts and dynamism they can present.",
    keywords = "Information ethics, Library ethics, Codes of ethics, ICT Digital transition, Case studies, ICT, Digital transition",
    author = "Stuart FERGUSON and Clare Thornley and Forbes Gibb",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.02.012",
    language = "English",
    volume = "36",
    pages = "543--556",
    journal = "Social Science Information Studies",
    issn = "0268-4012",
    publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
    number = "4",

    }

    Beyond codes of ethics: How library and information professionals navigate ethical dilemmas in a complex and dynamic information environment. / FERGUSON, Stuart; Thornley, Clare; Gibb, Forbes.

    In: International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2016, p. 543-556.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Beyond codes of ethics: How library and information professionals navigate ethical dilemmas in a complex and dynamic information environment

    AU - FERGUSON, Stuart

    AU - Thornley, Clare

    AU - Gibb, Forbes

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - This paper reports on a research project that investigated how library and information (LIS) professionals experience ethical dilemmas, with particular reference to the impact of new technologies, sources used to assist ethical decision-making, and the contribution case studies can make to ethical understanding and decision-making. Data was collected through interviews in Britain, Ireland and Australia with LIS professionals, educators, and representatives of professional bodies. The findings identify the main types of dilemma raised and discuss cases indicative of each type. They suggest that new technologies do not appear to change ethical principles but, when experienced in the workplace, substantially change the factors the professional has to evaluate. They also suggest that relevant codes of ethics are satisfactory on traditional library issues of access and confidentiality, but do not address the ethical challenges of current and potential digital environments. Professional associations appear more familiar with codes of ethics than practitioners although practitioners show high levels of ethical awareness, suggesting associations need to communicate more with their members and provide tools that are more useful in the workplace. Case studies are seen as a good way to educate and engage practitioners because of the complexity, conflicts and dynamism they can present.

    AB - This paper reports on a research project that investigated how library and information (LIS) professionals experience ethical dilemmas, with particular reference to the impact of new technologies, sources used to assist ethical decision-making, and the contribution case studies can make to ethical understanding and decision-making. Data was collected through interviews in Britain, Ireland and Australia with LIS professionals, educators, and representatives of professional bodies. The findings identify the main types of dilemma raised and discuss cases indicative of each type. They suggest that new technologies do not appear to change ethical principles but, when experienced in the workplace, substantially change the factors the professional has to evaluate. They also suggest that relevant codes of ethics are satisfactory on traditional library issues of access and confidentiality, but do not address the ethical challenges of current and potential digital environments. Professional associations appear more familiar with codes of ethics than practitioners although practitioners show high levels of ethical awareness, suggesting associations need to communicate more with their members and provide tools that are more useful in the workplace. Case studies are seen as a good way to educate and engage practitioners because of the complexity, conflicts and dynamism they can present.

    KW - Information ethics

    KW - Library ethics

    KW - Codes of ethics

    KW - ICT Digital transition

    KW - Case studies

    KW - ICT

    KW - Digital transition

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961843616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/beyond-codes-ethics-library-information-professionals-navigate-ethical-dilemmas-complex-dynamic-info

    U2 - 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.02.012

    DO - 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.02.012

    M3 - Article

    VL - 36

    SP - 543

    EP - 556

    JO - Social Science Information Studies

    JF - Social Science Information Studies

    SN - 0268-4012

    IS - 4

    ER -