Abstract
Australian archaeologists have been grappling with the complexities of ‘contact archaeology’ since the early 1990s, following pioneering work undertaken by Jim Allen, Judy Birmingham and Campbell Macknight, amongst others. Since that time various alternatives to the usage of the term ‘contact’ have been offered, including ‘cross-cultural encounter’, ‘interaction’, ‘engagement’, ‘negotiation’, ‘exchange’ and ‘entanglement’. Readers well-versed in the Australian literature will recognise this as a familiar problem rather than a revelation. Nonetheless, this paper highlights that ongoing issues persist with regard to how we name, frame and explain archaeologies of culture contact.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 96-98 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Australian Archaeology |
| Volume | 88 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond colonialism? A comment on the formulation of ‘contact’ archaeology in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver