Beyond here, beyond now, beyond human: Reflecting on ghostly presences in field research

Amanda EDWARDS

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The research encounter can be understood as an interaction between an individuated researcher positioned inside or outside a community or culture, a more fluid researcher testing and sometimes crossing the permeable boundaries of a shifting community, or a brief, fragile entanglement of dynamic trajectories. Within this last, relational approach, previous work identifies the agency of multiple past and present human social relationships in the co-construction of the research story, however, there has been limited reflection on (bio)physical, geographical, artefactual and other more-than-human entanglements. In this article, I use a creative, non-fiction approach to describe the processes, and challenges, involved in developing a dynamic, relational understanding of research encounters through an exploration of how (bio)physical, geographical, artefactual and other presences interact with ghostly geographies, histories and imaginaries in persons and places to influence the generation and analysis of research data.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-245
Number of pages15
JournalCultural Geographies
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

field research
community
geography
human being
present
history
interaction

Cite this

@article{3a9ea589d17e4e6daa25a9cf7079f8cf,
title = "Beyond here, beyond now, beyond human: Reflecting on ghostly presences in field research",
abstract = "The research encounter can be understood as an interaction between an individuated researcher positioned inside or outside a community or culture, a more fluid researcher testing and sometimes crossing the permeable boundaries of a shifting community, or a brief, fragile entanglement of dynamic trajectories. Within this last, relational approach, previous work identifies the agency of multiple past and present human social relationships in the co-construction of the research story, however, there has been limited reflection on (bio)physical, geographical, artefactual and other more-than-human entanglements. In this article, I use a creative, non-fiction approach to describe the processes, and challenges, involved in developing a dynamic, relational understanding of research encounters through an exploration of how (bio)physical, geographical, artefactual and other presences interact with ghostly geographies, histories and imaginaries in persons and places to influence the generation and analysis of research data.",
keywords = "Creative non-fiction, Field research, Ghosts, Reflexivity, Relational, Subjectivity, field research, subjectivity, ghosts, creative non-fiction, relational, reflexivity",
author = "Amanda EDWARDS",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1177/1474474016673062",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "231--245",
journal = "Ecumene",
issn = "1474-4740",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Beyond here, beyond now, beyond human: Reflecting on ghostly presences in field research. / EDWARDS, Amanda.

In: Cultural Geographies, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2017, p. 231-245.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond here, beyond now, beyond human: Reflecting on ghostly presences in field research

AU - EDWARDS, Amanda

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The research encounter can be understood as an interaction between an individuated researcher positioned inside or outside a community or culture, a more fluid researcher testing and sometimes crossing the permeable boundaries of a shifting community, or a brief, fragile entanglement of dynamic trajectories. Within this last, relational approach, previous work identifies the agency of multiple past and present human social relationships in the co-construction of the research story, however, there has been limited reflection on (bio)physical, geographical, artefactual and other more-than-human entanglements. In this article, I use a creative, non-fiction approach to describe the processes, and challenges, involved in developing a dynamic, relational understanding of research encounters through an exploration of how (bio)physical, geographical, artefactual and other presences interact with ghostly geographies, histories and imaginaries in persons and places to influence the generation and analysis of research data.

AB - The research encounter can be understood as an interaction between an individuated researcher positioned inside or outside a community or culture, a more fluid researcher testing and sometimes crossing the permeable boundaries of a shifting community, or a brief, fragile entanglement of dynamic trajectories. Within this last, relational approach, previous work identifies the agency of multiple past and present human social relationships in the co-construction of the research story, however, there has been limited reflection on (bio)physical, geographical, artefactual and other more-than-human entanglements. In this article, I use a creative, non-fiction approach to describe the processes, and challenges, involved in developing a dynamic, relational understanding of research encounters through an exploration of how (bio)physical, geographical, artefactual and other presences interact with ghostly geographies, histories and imaginaries in persons and places to influence the generation and analysis of research data.

KW - Creative non-fiction

KW - Field research

KW - Ghosts

KW - Reflexivity

KW - Relational

KW - Subjectivity

KW - field research

KW - subjectivity

KW - ghosts

KW - creative non-fiction

KW - relational

KW - reflexivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033410121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1474474016673062

DO - 10.1177/1474474016673062

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 231

EP - 245

JO - Ecumene

JF - Ecumene

SN - 1474-4740

IS - 2

ER -