Beyond Party Discipline: UK Parliamentary Voting on Foxhunting

Alison Plumb, David Marsh

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In the second term of the New Labour Government, the issue of fox hunting occupied 700 hours of parliamentary time and received extensive press attention. This article shows that the hunting case reveals a different pattern than that found for voting on other conscience issues in the UK parliament, with party an almost perfect predictor of voting in the two main parties. In examining this outcome, we focus on way in which the issue played in both the main political parties during the passage of the Hunting Bill. In the Labour party, the strength of backbench support for the Bill overwhelmed the ambivalence of the frontbench. In contrast, the Conservative Party became more united as a response to the increased politicisation of the issue by Labour backbenchers and increased extra-parliamentary political activity by the Countryside Alliance
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)313-332
    Number of pages20
    JournalBritish Politics
    Volume8
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    party discipline
    voting
    conservative party
    Labour Party
    conscience
    politicization
    New Labour
    political activity
    ambivalence
    bill
    parliament
    labor
    Parliamentary
    Voting
    Hunting

    Cite this

    @article{21f85b0cd27e487495d9ed5e8062fc72,
    title = "Beyond Party Discipline: UK Parliamentary Voting on Foxhunting",
    abstract = "In the second term of the New Labour Government, the issue of fox hunting occupied 700 hours of parliamentary time and received extensive press attention. This article shows that the hunting case reveals a different pattern than that found for voting on other conscience issues in the UK parliament, with party an almost perfect predictor of voting in the two main parties. In examining this outcome, we focus on way in which the issue played in both the main political parties during the passage of the Hunting Bill. In the Labour party, the strength of backbench support for the Bill overwhelmed the ambivalence of the frontbench. In contrast, the Conservative Party became more united as a response to the increased politicisation of the issue by Labour backbenchers and increased extra-parliamentary political activity by the Countryside Alliance",
    author = "Alison Plumb and David Marsh",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1057/bp.2013.2",
    language = "English",
    volume = "8",
    pages = "313--332",
    journal = "British Politics",
    issn = "1746-918X",
    publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
    number = "3",

    }

    Beyond Party Discipline: UK Parliamentary Voting on Foxhunting. / Plumb, Alison; Marsh, David.

    In: British Politics, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2013, p. 313-332.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Beyond Party Discipline: UK Parliamentary Voting on Foxhunting

    AU - Plumb, Alison

    AU - Marsh, David

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - In the second term of the New Labour Government, the issue of fox hunting occupied 700 hours of parliamentary time and received extensive press attention. This article shows that the hunting case reveals a different pattern than that found for voting on other conscience issues in the UK parliament, with party an almost perfect predictor of voting in the two main parties. In examining this outcome, we focus on way in which the issue played in both the main political parties during the passage of the Hunting Bill. In the Labour party, the strength of backbench support for the Bill overwhelmed the ambivalence of the frontbench. In contrast, the Conservative Party became more united as a response to the increased politicisation of the issue by Labour backbenchers and increased extra-parliamentary political activity by the Countryside Alliance

    AB - In the second term of the New Labour Government, the issue of fox hunting occupied 700 hours of parliamentary time and received extensive press attention. This article shows that the hunting case reveals a different pattern than that found for voting on other conscience issues in the UK parliament, with party an almost perfect predictor of voting in the two main parties. In examining this outcome, we focus on way in which the issue played in both the main political parties during the passage of the Hunting Bill. In the Labour party, the strength of backbench support for the Bill overwhelmed the ambivalence of the frontbench. In contrast, the Conservative Party became more united as a response to the increased politicisation of the issue by Labour backbenchers and increased extra-parliamentary political activity by the Countryside Alliance

    U2 - 10.1057/bp.2013.2

    DO - 10.1057/bp.2013.2

    M3 - Article

    VL - 8

    SP - 313

    EP - 332

    JO - British Politics

    JF - British Politics

    SN - 1746-918X

    IS - 3

    ER -