TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond promises
T2 - Realities of climate finance justice and energy transitions in Asia and the Pacific
AU - Anantharajah, Kirsty
AU - Setyowati, Abidah B.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to all key informants who participated in the interviews and provided their time and valuable insights. The authors also highly appreciate Prof Neil Gunningham's comments on an early draft of this manuscript. The research is benefited from the financial support of research grants from Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) of Australia entitled ‘Harnessing Financial Markets and Institutional Investment to Increase the Take Up of Renewable Energy in Asia-Pacific’ and Asia Pacific Innovation Program (APIP)-Research Excellence Award and Research Development Award, Australian National University . The second author also thanks to the project funded by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) “Regional Development Planning and Ideal Lifestyle of Future Indonesia” that partially provides time for the manuscript completion.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Climate change is already having substantial adverse impacts across the globe, and these are projected to worsen dramatically in years to come without rapid and far-reaching measures to transition to low carbon development. Crucially, massive financial investment will be necessary to fast track a low carbon transition and the level of finance required will arguably be well beyond the resources and capability of public finance alone. With a focus on climate finance in Asia and the Pacific and drawing empirical evidence from our work in Fiji and Indonesia, this article investigates complex realities of climate finance as it flows to the recipient countries. This article reveals how existing structures and power relations impact the outcomes of financing transitions to low carbon energy. The findings suggest that climate finance flows primarily to the most bankable, lowest risk, highest return, and often the largest scale projects. Moreover, the prioritisation of large-scale projects tends to result in preference for on-grid as opposed to off-grid renewable infrastructures, the reinforcement of technological preferences of powerful stakeholders, and the exclusion of smaller projects and developers. Consequently, it could exacerbate rather than ameliorate existing inequalities with the most vulnerable groups gaining little if any benefits from such finance. This article concludes by highlighting the importance of designing climate finance governance and financial products that could mitigate multi-scalar inequalities and design the mechanisms that internalise the need for critical, intersectional co-benefit delivery.
AB - Climate change is already having substantial adverse impacts across the globe, and these are projected to worsen dramatically in years to come without rapid and far-reaching measures to transition to low carbon development. Crucially, massive financial investment will be necessary to fast track a low carbon transition and the level of finance required will arguably be well beyond the resources and capability of public finance alone. With a focus on climate finance in Asia and the Pacific and drawing empirical evidence from our work in Fiji and Indonesia, this article investigates complex realities of climate finance as it flows to the recipient countries. This article reveals how existing structures and power relations impact the outcomes of financing transitions to low carbon energy. The findings suggest that climate finance flows primarily to the most bankable, lowest risk, highest return, and often the largest scale projects. Moreover, the prioritisation of large-scale projects tends to result in preference for on-grid as opposed to off-grid renewable infrastructures, the reinforcement of technological preferences of powerful stakeholders, and the exclusion of smaller projects and developers. Consequently, it could exacerbate rather than ameliorate existing inequalities with the most vulnerable groups gaining little if any benefits from such finance. This article concludes by highlighting the importance of designing climate finance governance and financial products that could mitigate multi-scalar inequalities and design the mechanisms that internalise the need for critical, intersectional co-benefit delivery.
KW - Climate finance
KW - Climate justice
KW - Energy justice
KW - Energy transition
KW - Fiji
KW - Indonesia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125367077&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102550
DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102550
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85125367077
SN - 2214-6296
VL - 89
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - Energy research and social science
JF - Energy research and social science
M1 - 102550
ER -