Beyond the corporeal: extending propertisation of body parts to derivative information

Wendy BONYTHON, Bruce ARNOLD

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Jurisprudential consideration of property in the human body has typically conceptualised it as tangible, of finite lifespan, with limited end uses. This article offers an alternative conceptualisation: the body as information – intangible, infinite, and perpetual. Global markets in health "big data" – including population genomic data – trade this information. Emerging jurisprudence on source rights in this information are derived from jurisprudence based on the traditional, tangible, finite conceptualisation of the body – itself controversial – criticised in part for disregarding property rights vesting in the self, while recognising them in strangers. As such, it provides an uncertain foundation for extension to govern rights over derivatives, enabling disregard of legitimate concerns about health, commercialisation and genetic privacy, concerns compounded by the intergenerational nature of genetic information. A more nuanced approach, recognising that donors and strangers alike hold only weak custodial rights over access, use, and dissemination of tissues and derivative information, is required.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)688-709
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Law and Medicine
Volume23
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Jurisprudence
Human Body
Genetic Privacy
Metagenomics
Ownership
Health

Cite this

@article{943ae92f4e0047619dc43a9455b2b502,
title = "Beyond the corporeal: extending propertisation of body parts to derivative information",
abstract = "Jurisprudential consideration of property in the human body has typically conceptualised it as tangible, of finite lifespan, with limited end uses. This article offers an alternative conceptualisation: the body as information – intangible, infinite, and perpetual. Global markets in health {"}big data{"} – including population genomic data – trade this information. Emerging jurisprudence on source rights in this information are derived from jurisprudence based on the traditional, tangible, finite conceptualisation of the body – itself controversial – criticised in part for disregarding property rights vesting in the self, while recognising them in strangers. As such, it provides an uncertain foundation for extension to govern rights over derivatives, enabling disregard of legitimate concerns about health, commercialisation and genetic privacy, concerns compounded by the intergenerational nature of genetic information. A more nuanced approach, recognising that donors and strangers alike hold only weak custodial rights over access, use, and dissemination of tissues and derivative information, is required.",
author = "Wendy BONYTHON and Bruce ARNOLD",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "688--709",
journal = "Journal of Law and Medicine",
issn = "1320-159X",
publisher = "Thomson Head Office",
number = "3",

}

Beyond the corporeal: extending propertisation of body parts to derivative information. / BONYTHON, Wendy; ARNOLD, Bruce.

In: Journal of Law and Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2016, p. 688-709.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond the corporeal: extending propertisation of body parts to derivative information

AU - BONYTHON, Wendy

AU - ARNOLD, Bruce

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Jurisprudential consideration of property in the human body has typically conceptualised it as tangible, of finite lifespan, with limited end uses. This article offers an alternative conceptualisation: the body as information – intangible, infinite, and perpetual. Global markets in health "big data" – including population genomic data – trade this information. Emerging jurisprudence on source rights in this information are derived from jurisprudence based on the traditional, tangible, finite conceptualisation of the body – itself controversial – criticised in part for disregarding property rights vesting in the self, while recognising them in strangers. As such, it provides an uncertain foundation for extension to govern rights over derivatives, enabling disregard of legitimate concerns about health, commercialisation and genetic privacy, concerns compounded by the intergenerational nature of genetic information. A more nuanced approach, recognising that donors and strangers alike hold only weak custodial rights over access, use, and dissemination of tissues and derivative information, is required.

AB - Jurisprudential consideration of property in the human body has typically conceptualised it as tangible, of finite lifespan, with limited end uses. This article offers an alternative conceptualisation: the body as information – intangible, infinite, and perpetual. Global markets in health "big data" – including population genomic data – trade this information. Emerging jurisprudence on source rights in this information are derived from jurisprudence based on the traditional, tangible, finite conceptualisation of the body – itself controversial – criticised in part for disregarding property rights vesting in the self, while recognising them in strangers. As such, it provides an uncertain foundation for extension to govern rights over derivatives, enabling disregard of legitimate concerns about health, commercialisation and genetic privacy, concerns compounded by the intergenerational nature of genetic information. A more nuanced approach, recognising that donors and strangers alike hold only weak custodial rights over access, use, and dissemination of tissues and derivative information, is required.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977468256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 688

EP - 709

JO - Journal of Law and Medicine

JF - Journal of Law and Medicine

SN - 1320-159X

IS - 3

ER -