Beyond the Integrity Paradox - towards 'good enough' governance

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    21 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article understands integrity in public administration as a metaphor for the crafting of accountable, transparent, competent and responsive public administration underpinned by the concept of public value. It further argues that the design of effective integrity agencies requires a broad understanding of the obstacles to the achievement of integrity in public administration, the options for integrity reform and the appropriate strategic framework for implementing them. It concludes that integrity in public administration provides a methodology for achieving 'good enough' governance - a relative, evolving and culturally defined aspiration - otherwise known in mature democracies as representative, responsible and accountable government. It observes, however, that the achievement of integrity in public administration is as much a behavioural challenge as a problem of institutional design. Over the past two decades there has been a fascination with responding to integrity problems either through structural reform and the proliferation of integrity policy and processes to reinforce workplace integrity or by creating new institutions. These are often layered over existing institutions without due reflection on roles and responsibilities creating a crowded and inefficient policy and operational environment. Public organisations consequently spend a great deal of time, energy and resources on meeting compliance obligations rather than embedding integrity values in the hearts and minds of public servants. The removal of this integrity paradox remains the central challenge for integrity reform in Australia and has strong cadences in other Westminster style democracies
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)97-113
    Number of pages17
    JournalPolicy Studies
    Volume33
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    good governance
    integrity
    public administration
    democracy
    reform
    structural reform
    servants
    proliferation
    Values
    obligation
    metaphor
    workplace

    Cite this

    @article{b2e39a7f62c542e5ac75000efc2dbacd,
    title = "Beyond the Integrity Paradox - towards 'good enough' governance",
    abstract = "This article understands integrity in public administration as a metaphor for the crafting of accountable, transparent, competent and responsive public administration underpinned by the concept of public value. It further argues that the design of effective integrity agencies requires a broad understanding of the obstacles to the achievement of integrity in public administration, the options for integrity reform and the appropriate strategic framework for implementing them. It concludes that integrity in public administration provides a methodology for achieving 'good enough' governance - a relative, evolving and culturally defined aspiration - otherwise known in mature democracies as representative, responsible and accountable government. It observes, however, that the achievement of integrity in public administration is as much a behavioural challenge as a problem of institutional design. Over the past two decades there has been a fascination with responding to integrity problems either through structural reform and the proliferation of integrity policy and processes to reinforce workplace integrity or by creating new institutions. These are often layered over existing institutions without due reflection on roles and responsibilities creating a crowded and inefficient policy and operational environment. Public organisations consequently spend a great deal of time, energy and resources on meeting compliance obligations rather than embedding integrity values in the hearts and minds of public servants. The removal of this integrity paradox remains the central challenge for integrity reform in Australia and has strong cadences in other Westminster style democracies",
    keywords = "Integrity, Public Adminstration",
    author = "Mark Evans",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1080/01442872.2011.637324",
    language = "English",
    volume = "33",
    pages = "97--113",
    journal = "Policy Studies",
    issn = "0144-2872",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "1",

    }

    Beyond the Integrity Paradox - towards 'good enough' governance. / Evans, Mark.

    In: Policy Studies, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2012, p. 97-113.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Beyond the Integrity Paradox - towards 'good enough' governance

    AU - Evans, Mark

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - This article understands integrity in public administration as a metaphor for the crafting of accountable, transparent, competent and responsive public administration underpinned by the concept of public value. It further argues that the design of effective integrity agencies requires a broad understanding of the obstacles to the achievement of integrity in public administration, the options for integrity reform and the appropriate strategic framework for implementing them. It concludes that integrity in public administration provides a methodology for achieving 'good enough' governance - a relative, evolving and culturally defined aspiration - otherwise known in mature democracies as representative, responsible and accountable government. It observes, however, that the achievement of integrity in public administration is as much a behavioural challenge as a problem of institutional design. Over the past two decades there has been a fascination with responding to integrity problems either through structural reform and the proliferation of integrity policy and processes to reinforce workplace integrity or by creating new institutions. These are often layered over existing institutions without due reflection on roles and responsibilities creating a crowded and inefficient policy and operational environment. Public organisations consequently spend a great deal of time, energy and resources on meeting compliance obligations rather than embedding integrity values in the hearts and minds of public servants. The removal of this integrity paradox remains the central challenge for integrity reform in Australia and has strong cadences in other Westminster style democracies

    AB - This article understands integrity in public administration as a metaphor for the crafting of accountable, transparent, competent and responsive public administration underpinned by the concept of public value. It further argues that the design of effective integrity agencies requires a broad understanding of the obstacles to the achievement of integrity in public administration, the options for integrity reform and the appropriate strategic framework for implementing them. It concludes that integrity in public administration provides a methodology for achieving 'good enough' governance - a relative, evolving and culturally defined aspiration - otherwise known in mature democracies as representative, responsible and accountable government. It observes, however, that the achievement of integrity in public administration is as much a behavioural challenge as a problem of institutional design. Over the past two decades there has been a fascination with responding to integrity problems either through structural reform and the proliferation of integrity policy and processes to reinforce workplace integrity or by creating new institutions. These are often layered over existing institutions without due reflection on roles and responsibilities creating a crowded and inefficient policy and operational environment. Public organisations consequently spend a great deal of time, energy and resources on meeting compliance obligations rather than embedding integrity values in the hearts and minds of public servants. The removal of this integrity paradox remains the central challenge for integrity reform in Australia and has strong cadences in other Westminster style democracies

    KW - Integrity

    KW - Public Adminstration

    U2 - 10.1080/01442872.2011.637324

    DO - 10.1080/01442872.2011.637324

    M3 - Article

    VL - 33

    SP - 97

    EP - 113

    JO - Policy Studies

    JF - Policy Studies

    SN - 0144-2872

    IS - 1

    ER -