Biofeedback improves activities of the lower limb after stroke: a systematic review.

Rosalyn Stanton, Louise Ada, Catherine Dean, Elisabeth PRESTON

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Question: Is biofeedback during the practice of lower limb activities after stroke effective in improving performance of those activities, and are any benefits maintained after intervention ceases? Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised trials.ParticipantsPeople who have had a stroke.InterventionBiofeedback during practice of sitting, standing up, standing, or walking. Outcome measures: Continuous measures of activity congruent with the activity trained.Results22 trials met the inclusion criteria and 19 contained data suitable for analysis. Effect sizes were calculated as standardised mean differences because different outcome measures were used. Since inclusion of all trials produced substantial statistical heterogeneity, only trials with a PEDro score >4 (11 trials) were included in the final analysis (mean PEDro score 5.7). In the short-term, biofeedback improved lower limb activities compared with usual therapy/placebo (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.75). Lower limb activities were still improved compared with usual therapy/placebo 1 to 5 months after the cessation of intervention (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.75).Conclusion: Augmenting feedback through the use of biofeedback is superior to usual therapy/placebo at improving lower limb activities in people following stroke. Furthermore, these benefits are largely maintained in the longer term. Given that many biofeedback machines are relatively inexpensive, biofeedback could be utilised more widely in clinical practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-155.
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Physiotherapy
Volume 57
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Lower Extremity
Stroke
Placebos
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Walking
Meta-Analysis
Therapeutics

Cite this

Stanton, Rosalyn ; Ada, Louise ; Dean, Catherine ; PRESTON, Elisabeth. / Biofeedback improves activities of the lower limb after stroke: a systematic review. In: Journal of Physiotherapy. 2011 ; Vol. 57. pp. 145-155.
@article{13d6fc4e771e468486b6eb574c9a76ca,
title = "Biofeedback improves activities of the lower limb after stroke: a systematic review.",
abstract = "Question: Is biofeedback during the practice of lower limb activities after stroke effective in improving performance of those activities, and are any benefits maintained after intervention ceases? Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised trials.ParticipantsPeople who have had a stroke.InterventionBiofeedback during practice of sitting, standing up, standing, or walking. Outcome measures: Continuous measures of activity congruent with the activity trained.Results22 trials met the inclusion criteria and 19 contained data suitable for analysis. Effect sizes were calculated as standardised mean differences because different outcome measures were used. Since inclusion of all trials produced substantial statistical heterogeneity, only trials with a PEDro score >4 (11 trials) were included in the final analysis (mean PEDro score 5.7). In the short-term, biofeedback improved lower limb activities compared with usual therapy/placebo (SMD = 0.49, 95{\%} CI 0.22 to 0.75). Lower limb activities were still improved compared with usual therapy/placebo 1 to 5 months after the cessation of intervention (SMD = 0.41, 95{\%} CI 0.06 to 0.75).Conclusion: Augmenting feedback through the use of biofeedback is superior to usual therapy/placebo at improving lower limb activities in people following stroke. Furthermore, these benefits are largely maintained in the longer term. Given that many biofeedback machines are relatively inexpensive, biofeedback could be utilised more widely in clinical practice.",
author = "Rosalyn Stanton and Louise Ada and Catherine Dean and Elisabeth PRESTON",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1016/S1836-9553(11)70035-2",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "145--155.",
journal = "Australian Journal of Physiotherapy",
issn = "0004-9514",
publisher = "Australian Physiotherapy Association",

}

Biofeedback improves activities of the lower limb after stroke: a systematic review. / Stanton, Rosalyn; Ada, Louise; Dean, Catherine; PRESTON, Elisabeth.

In: Journal of Physiotherapy, Vol. 57, 2011, p. 145-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biofeedback improves activities of the lower limb after stroke: a systematic review.

AU - Stanton, Rosalyn

AU - Ada, Louise

AU - Dean, Catherine

AU - PRESTON, Elisabeth

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Question: Is biofeedback during the practice of lower limb activities after stroke effective in improving performance of those activities, and are any benefits maintained after intervention ceases? Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised trials.ParticipantsPeople who have had a stroke.InterventionBiofeedback during practice of sitting, standing up, standing, or walking. Outcome measures: Continuous measures of activity congruent with the activity trained.Results22 trials met the inclusion criteria and 19 contained data suitable for analysis. Effect sizes were calculated as standardised mean differences because different outcome measures were used. Since inclusion of all trials produced substantial statistical heterogeneity, only trials with a PEDro score >4 (11 trials) were included in the final analysis (mean PEDro score 5.7). In the short-term, biofeedback improved lower limb activities compared with usual therapy/placebo (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.75). Lower limb activities were still improved compared with usual therapy/placebo 1 to 5 months after the cessation of intervention (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.75).Conclusion: Augmenting feedback through the use of biofeedback is superior to usual therapy/placebo at improving lower limb activities in people following stroke. Furthermore, these benefits are largely maintained in the longer term. Given that many biofeedback machines are relatively inexpensive, biofeedback could be utilised more widely in clinical practice.

AB - Question: Is biofeedback during the practice of lower limb activities after stroke effective in improving performance of those activities, and are any benefits maintained after intervention ceases? Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised trials.ParticipantsPeople who have had a stroke.InterventionBiofeedback during practice of sitting, standing up, standing, or walking. Outcome measures: Continuous measures of activity congruent with the activity trained.Results22 trials met the inclusion criteria and 19 contained data suitable for analysis. Effect sizes were calculated as standardised mean differences because different outcome measures were used. Since inclusion of all trials produced substantial statistical heterogeneity, only trials with a PEDro score >4 (11 trials) were included in the final analysis (mean PEDro score 5.7). In the short-term, biofeedback improved lower limb activities compared with usual therapy/placebo (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.75). Lower limb activities were still improved compared with usual therapy/placebo 1 to 5 months after the cessation of intervention (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.75).Conclusion: Augmenting feedback through the use of biofeedback is superior to usual therapy/placebo at improving lower limb activities in people following stroke. Furthermore, these benefits are largely maintained in the longer term. Given that many biofeedback machines are relatively inexpensive, biofeedback could be utilised more widely in clinical practice.

U2 - 10.1016/S1836-9553(11)70035-2

DO - 10.1016/S1836-9553(11)70035-2

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 145-155.

JO - Australian Journal of Physiotherapy

JF - Australian Journal of Physiotherapy

SN - 0004-9514

ER -