Biological diversity and cultural diversity

The heritage of nature and culture through the looking glass of multilateral Agreements

Peter Bridgewater, Salvatore Arico, John Scott

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Biological diversity is a concept that has been developed and enshrined in multilateral agreements in a very short space of time. It is generally agreed that it was in 1986 that the concept was introduced. Much older in concept is cultural diversity. These two diversities are now meeting each other in many ways, not least through Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs). And both diversities are recognised, explicitly and implicitly, as part of the global heritage of humankind, with the attendant responsibilities that flow from that. In this paper we show the extent to which the two diversities are mutually self-supporting, and yet how in many cases MEAs seem to have ignored their mutual strengths. However, the very needs that are promoting synergies between the MEAs and broader UN programmes are also now promoting new ways of viewing interaction between the diversities. Nowhere is this clearer than in cultural landscapes, which feature explicitly in some MEAs but have impacts in all. For the future some seven key areas of research and development will help to build the strengths and mutual interaction of the diversities, within the policy framework of the MEAs.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)405-419
    Number of pages15
    JournalInternational Journal of Heritage Studies
    Volume13
    Issue number4-5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2007

    Fingerprint

    cultural landscape
    cultural diversity
    research and development
    glass
    interaction
    synergy
    programme
    policy
    need
    responsibility
    multilateral agreement
    Cultural diversity
    Multilateral environmental agreements
    Nature
    Heritage
    Biological diversity
    Cultural Diversity
    Biological Diversity
    UNO
    Interaction

    Cite this

    @article{ca0dc18b8a0949a0bcd796d9a74a0f43,
    title = "Biological diversity and cultural diversity: The heritage of nature and culture through the looking glass of multilateral Agreements",
    abstract = "Biological diversity is a concept that has been developed and enshrined in multilateral agreements in a very short space of time. It is generally agreed that it was in 1986 that the concept was introduced. Much older in concept is cultural diversity. These two diversities are now meeting each other in many ways, not least through Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs). And both diversities are recognised, explicitly and implicitly, as part of the global heritage of humankind, with the attendant responsibilities that flow from that. In this paper we show the extent to which the two diversities are mutually self-supporting, and yet how in many cases MEAs seem to have ignored their mutual strengths. However, the very needs that are promoting synergies between the MEAs and broader UN programmes are also now promoting new ways of viewing interaction between the diversities. Nowhere is this clearer than in cultural landscapes, which feature explicitly in some MEAs but have impacts in all. For the future some seven key areas of research and development will help to build the strengths and mutual interaction of the diversities, within the policy framework of the MEAs.",
    keywords = "Biological diversity, Conventions, Cultural diversity, Indigineous",
    author = "Peter Bridgewater and Salvatore Arico and John Scott",
    year = "2007",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1080/13527250701351130",
    language = "English",
    volume = "13",
    pages = "405--419",
    journal = "International Journal of Heritage Studies",
    issn = "1352-7258",
    publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
    number = "4-5",

    }

    Biological diversity and cultural diversity : The heritage of nature and culture through the looking glass of multilateral Agreements. / Bridgewater, Peter; Arico, Salvatore; Scott, John.

    In: International Journal of Heritage Studies, Vol. 13, No. 4-5, 01.07.2007, p. 405-419.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Biological diversity and cultural diversity

    T2 - The heritage of nature and culture through the looking glass of multilateral Agreements

    AU - Bridgewater, Peter

    AU - Arico, Salvatore

    AU - Scott, John

    PY - 2007/7/1

    Y1 - 2007/7/1

    N2 - Biological diversity is a concept that has been developed and enshrined in multilateral agreements in a very short space of time. It is generally agreed that it was in 1986 that the concept was introduced. Much older in concept is cultural diversity. These two diversities are now meeting each other in many ways, not least through Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs). And both diversities are recognised, explicitly and implicitly, as part of the global heritage of humankind, with the attendant responsibilities that flow from that. In this paper we show the extent to which the two diversities are mutually self-supporting, and yet how in many cases MEAs seem to have ignored their mutual strengths. However, the very needs that are promoting synergies between the MEAs and broader UN programmes are also now promoting new ways of viewing interaction between the diversities. Nowhere is this clearer than in cultural landscapes, which feature explicitly in some MEAs but have impacts in all. For the future some seven key areas of research and development will help to build the strengths and mutual interaction of the diversities, within the policy framework of the MEAs.

    AB - Biological diversity is a concept that has been developed and enshrined in multilateral agreements in a very short space of time. It is generally agreed that it was in 1986 that the concept was introduced. Much older in concept is cultural diversity. These two diversities are now meeting each other in many ways, not least through Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs). And both diversities are recognised, explicitly and implicitly, as part of the global heritage of humankind, with the attendant responsibilities that flow from that. In this paper we show the extent to which the two diversities are mutually self-supporting, and yet how in many cases MEAs seem to have ignored their mutual strengths. However, the very needs that are promoting synergies between the MEAs and broader UN programmes are also now promoting new ways of viewing interaction between the diversities. Nowhere is this clearer than in cultural landscapes, which feature explicitly in some MEAs but have impacts in all. For the future some seven key areas of research and development will help to build the strengths and mutual interaction of the diversities, within the policy framework of the MEAs.

    KW - Biological diversity

    KW - Conventions

    KW - Cultural diversity

    KW - Indigineous

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51249157478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/13527250701351130

    DO - 10.1080/13527250701351130

    M3 - Article

    VL - 13

    SP - 405

    EP - 419

    JO - International Journal of Heritage Studies

    JF - International Journal of Heritage Studies

    SN - 1352-7258

    IS - 4-5

    ER -