Body Mass and Weekly Training Distance Influence the Pain and Injuries Experienced by Runners Using Minimalist Shoes

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Joel T. Fuller, Dominic Thewlis, Jonathan D. Buckley, Nicholas A.T. Brown, Joseph Hamill, Margarita D. Tsiros

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Minimalist shoes have been popularized as a safe alternative to conventional running shoes. However, a paucity of research is available investigating the longer-term safety of minimalist shoes. Purpose: To compare running-related pain and injury between minimalist and conventional shoes in trained runners and to investigate interactions between shoe type, body mass, and weekly training distance. Study Design: Randomized clinical trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Sixty-one trained, habitual rearfoot footfall runners (mean ± SD: body mass, 74.6 ± 9.3 kg; weekly training distance, 25 ± 14 km) were randomly allocated to either minimalist or conventional shoes. Runners gradually increased the time spent running in their allocated shoes over 26 weeks. Running-related pain intensity was measured weekly by use of 100-mm visual analog scales. Time to first running-related injury was also assessed. Results: Interactions were found between shoe type and weekly training distance for weekly running-related pain; greater pain was experienced with minimalist shoes (P <.05), and clinically meaningful increases (>10 mm) were noted when the weekly training distance was more than 35 km/wk. Eleven of 30 runners sustained an injury in conventional shoes compared with 16 of 31 runners in minimalist shoes (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-4.27; P =.31). A shoe × body mass interaction was found for time to first running-related injury (P =.01). For runners using minimalist shoes, relative to runners using conventional shoes, the risk of sustaining an injury became more likely with increasing body mass above 71.4 kg, and the risk was moderately increased (hazard ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.66; P =.02) for runners using minimalist shoes who had a body mass of 85.7 kg. Conclusions: Runners should limit weekly training distance in minimalist shoes to avoid running-related pain. Heavier runners are at greater risk of injury when running in minimalist shoes. Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12613000642785).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1162-1170
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume45
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Shoes
Randomized Controlled Trials
Pain
Wounds and Injuries
Confidence Intervals
Somatotypes

Cite this

Fuller, Joel T. ; Thewlis, Dominic ; Buckley, Jonathan D. ; Brown, Nicholas A.T. ; Hamill, Joseph ; Tsiros, Margarita D. / Body Mass and Weekly Training Distance Influence the Pain and Injuries Experienced by Runners Using Minimalist Shoes : A Randomized Controlled Trial. In: American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 45, No. 5. pp. 1162-1170.
@article{afecce8f71b44a5cad2de21619c2d0a8,
title = "Body Mass and Weekly Training Distance Influence the Pain and Injuries Experienced by Runners Using Minimalist Shoes: A Randomized Controlled Trial",
abstract = "Background: Minimalist shoes have been popularized as a safe alternative to conventional running shoes. However, a paucity of research is available investigating the longer-term safety of minimalist shoes. Purpose: To compare running-related pain and injury between minimalist and conventional shoes in trained runners and to investigate interactions between shoe type, body mass, and weekly training distance. Study Design: Randomized clinical trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Sixty-one trained, habitual rearfoot footfall runners (mean ± SD: body mass, 74.6 ± 9.3 kg; weekly training distance, 25 ± 14 km) were randomly allocated to either minimalist or conventional shoes. Runners gradually increased the time spent running in their allocated shoes over 26 weeks. Running-related pain intensity was measured weekly by use of 100-mm visual analog scales. Time to first running-related injury was also assessed. Results: Interactions were found between shoe type and weekly training distance for weekly running-related pain; greater pain was experienced with minimalist shoes (P <.05), and clinically meaningful increases (>10 mm) were noted when the weekly training distance was more than 35 km/wk. Eleven of 30 runners sustained an injury in conventional shoes compared with 16 of 31 runners in minimalist shoes (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.63-4.27; P =.31). A shoe × body mass interaction was found for time to first running-related injury (P =.01). For runners using minimalist shoes, relative to runners using conventional shoes, the risk of sustaining an injury became more likely with increasing body mass above 71.4 kg, and the risk was moderately increased (hazard ratio, 2.00; 95{\%} confidence interval, 1.10-3.66; P =.02) for runners using minimalist shoes who had a body mass of 85.7 kg. Conclusions: Runners should limit weekly training distance in minimalist shoes to avoid running-related pain. Heavier runners are at greater risk of injury when running in minimalist shoes. Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12613000642785).",
keywords = "athletic injuries, footwear, pain, risk factors",
author = "Fuller, {Joel T.} and Dominic Thewlis and Buckley, {Jonathan D.} and Brown, {Nicholas A.T.} and Joseph Hamill and Tsiros, {Margarita D.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0363546516682497",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "1162--1170",
journal = "The Journal of sports medicine",
issn = "0363-5465",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Body Mass and Weekly Training Distance Influence the Pain and Injuries Experienced by Runners Using Minimalist Shoes : A Randomized Controlled Trial. / Fuller, Joel T.; Thewlis, Dominic; Buckley, Jonathan D.; Brown, Nicholas A.T.; Hamill, Joseph; Tsiros, Margarita D.

In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 45, No. 5, 01.04.2017, p. 1162-1170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Body Mass and Weekly Training Distance Influence the Pain and Injuries Experienced by Runners Using Minimalist Shoes

T2 - A Randomized Controlled Trial

AU - Fuller, Joel T.

AU - Thewlis, Dominic

AU - Buckley, Jonathan D.

AU - Brown, Nicholas A.T.

AU - Hamill, Joseph

AU - Tsiros, Margarita D.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Background: Minimalist shoes have been popularized as a safe alternative to conventional running shoes. However, a paucity of research is available investigating the longer-term safety of minimalist shoes. Purpose: To compare running-related pain and injury between minimalist and conventional shoes in trained runners and to investigate interactions between shoe type, body mass, and weekly training distance. Study Design: Randomized clinical trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Sixty-one trained, habitual rearfoot footfall runners (mean ± SD: body mass, 74.6 ± 9.3 kg; weekly training distance, 25 ± 14 km) were randomly allocated to either minimalist or conventional shoes. Runners gradually increased the time spent running in their allocated shoes over 26 weeks. Running-related pain intensity was measured weekly by use of 100-mm visual analog scales. Time to first running-related injury was also assessed. Results: Interactions were found between shoe type and weekly training distance for weekly running-related pain; greater pain was experienced with minimalist shoes (P <.05), and clinically meaningful increases (>10 mm) were noted when the weekly training distance was more than 35 km/wk. Eleven of 30 runners sustained an injury in conventional shoes compared with 16 of 31 runners in minimalist shoes (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-4.27; P =.31). A shoe × body mass interaction was found for time to first running-related injury (P =.01). For runners using minimalist shoes, relative to runners using conventional shoes, the risk of sustaining an injury became more likely with increasing body mass above 71.4 kg, and the risk was moderately increased (hazard ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.66; P =.02) for runners using minimalist shoes who had a body mass of 85.7 kg. Conclusions: Runners should limit weekly training distance in minimalist shoes to avoid running-related pain. Heavier runners are at greater risk of injury when running in minimalist shoes. Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12613000642785).

AB - Background: Minimalist shoes have been popularized as a safe alternative to conventional running shoes. However, a paucity of research is available investigating the longer-term safety of minimalist shoes. Purpose: To compare running-related pain and injury between minimalist and conventional shoes in trained runners and to investigate interactions between shoe type, body mass, and weekly training distance. Study Design: Randomized clinical trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Sixty-one trained, habitual rearfoot footfall runners (mean ± SD: body mass, 74.6 ± 9.3 kg; weekly training distance, 25 ± 14 km) were randomly allocated to either minimalist or conventional shoes. Runners gradually increased the time spent running in their allocated shoes over 26 weeks. Running-related pain intensity was measured weekly by use of 100-mm visual analog scales. Time to first running-related injury was also assessed. Results: Interactions were found between shoe type and weekly training distance for weekly running-related pain; greater pain was experienced with minimalist shoes (P <.05), and clinically meaningful increases (>10 mm) were noted when the weekly training distance was more than 35 km/wk. Eleven of 30 runners sustained an injury in conventional shoes compared with 16 of 31 runners in minimalist shoes (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-4.27; P =.31). A shoe × body mass interaction was found for time to first running-related injury (P =.01). For runners using minimalist shoes, relative to runners using conventional shoes, the risk of sustaining an injury became more likely with increasing body mass above 71.4 kg, and the risk was moderately increased (hazard ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.66; P =.02) for runners using minimalist shoes who had a body mass of 85.7 kg. Conclusions: Runners should limit weekly training distance in minimalist shoes to avoid running-related pain. Heavier runners are at greater risk of injury when running in minimalist shoes. Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12613000642785).

KW - athletic injuries

KW - footwear

KW - pain

KW - risk factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018379023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0363546516682497

DO - 10.1177/0363546516682497

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 1162

EP - 1170

JO - The Journal of sports medicine

JF - The Journal of sports medicine

SN - 0363-5465

IS - 5

ER -