Branding, politics and democracy

David Marsh, Paul FAWCETT

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    18 Citations (Scopus)
    6 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Branding and franchising, which are common features of commerce, have, more recently, permeated into politics in a number of ways. However, this development has received limited academic attention, an omission which this article addresses. More specifically, it has two main aims. Firstly, we develop a heuristic for analysing the relationship between branding and politics. Here, our intention is to stimulate discussion and, as with any heuristic, this one will stand or fall depending on whether other researchers find it useful. Secondly, we critically examine the relationship between political marketing/branding and governance and democracy. Here, we argue strongly that it is essential to develop a more critical political marketing/branding agenda. This research agenda would be much less instrumental in its research concerns and draw on broader epistemological and theoretical perspectives, allowing it to interrogate the relationship between marketing/branding and democracy in more depth than is the case at present.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)515-530
    Number of pages16
    JournalPolicy Studies
    Volume32
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    marketing
    democracy
    politics
    heuristics
    franchising
    commerce
    governance
    present

    Cite this

    Marsh, David ; FAWCETT, Paul. / Branding, politics and democracy. In: Policy Studies. 2011 ; Vol. 32, No. 5. pp. 515-530.
    @article{ad308ee8e7714b1f829d95e759521c76,
    title = "Branding, politics and democracy",
    abstract = "Branding and franchising, which are common features of commerce, have, more recently, permeated into politics in a number of ways. However, this development has received limited academic attention, an omission which this article addresses. More specifically, it has two main aims. Firstly, we develop a heuristic for analysing the relationship between branding and politics. Here, our intention is to stimulate discussion and, as with any heuristic, this one will stand or fall depending on whether other researchers find it useful. Secondly, we critically examine the relationship between political marketing/branding and governance and democracy. Here, we argue strongly that it is essential to develop a more critical political marketing/branding agenda. This research agenda would be much less instrumental in its research concerns and draw on broader epistemological and theoretical perspectives, allowing it to interrogate the relationship between marketing/branding and democracy in more depth than is the case at present.",
    keywords = "branding, governance, policy transfer, public policy",
    author = "David Marsh and Paul FAWCETT",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1080/01442872.2011.586498",
    language = "English",
    volume = "32",
    pages = "515--530",
    journal = "Policy Studies",
    issn = "0144-2872",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "5",

    }

    Branding, politics and democracy. / Marsh, David; FAWCETT, Paul.

    In: Policy Studies, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2011, p. 515-530.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Branding, politics and democracy

    AU - Marsh, David

    AU - FAWCETT, Paul

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Branding and franchising, which are common features of commerce, have, more recently, permeated into politics in a number of ways. However, this development has received limited academic attention, an omission which this article addresses. More specifically, it has two main aims. Firstly, we develop a heuristic for analysing the relationship between branding and politics. Here, our intention is to stimulate discussion and, as with any heuristic, this one will stand or fall depending on whether other researchers find it useful. Secondly, we critically examine the relationship between political marketing/branding and governance and democracy. Here, we argue strongly that it is essential to develop a more critical political marketing/branding agenda. This research agenda would be much less instrumental in its research concerns and draw on broader epistemological and theoretical perspectives, allowing it to interrogate the relationship between marketing/branding and democracy in more depth than is the case at present.

    AB - Branding and franchising, which are common features of commerce, have, more recently, permeated into politics in a number of ways. However, this development has received limited academic attention, an omission which this article addresses. More specifically, it has two main aims. Firstly, we develop a heuristic for analysing the relationship between branding and politics. Here, our intention is to stimulate discussion and, as with any heuristic, this one will stand or fall depending on whether other researchers find it useful. Secondly, we critically examine the relationship between political marketing/branding and governance and democracy. Here, we argue strongly that it is essential to develop a more critical political marketing/branding agenda. This research agenda would be much less instrumental in its research concerns and draw on broader epistemological and theoretical perspectives, allowing it to interrogate the relationship between marketing/branding and democracy in more depth than is the case at present.

    KW - branding

    KW - governance

    KW - policy transfer

    KW - public policy

    U2 - 10.1080/01442872.2011.586498

    DO - 10.1080/01442872.2011.586498

    M3 - Article

    VL - 32

    SP - 515

    EP - 530

    JO - Policy Studies

    JF - Policy Studies

    SN - 0144-2872

    IS - 5

    ER -