TY - JOUR
T1 - Bridging knowledge, policies and practices across the ageing and disability fields
T2 - A protocol for a scoping review to inform the development of a taxonomy
AU - Nalder, Emily Joan
AU - Putnam, Michelle
AU - Salvador-Carulla, Luis
AU - Spindel, Andria
AU - Batliwalla, Zinnia
AU - Lenton, Erica
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This work is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Planning and Dissemination Grant through the Institute of Aging.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Article author(s).
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - Introduction Bridging is a term used to describe activities, or tasks, used to promote collaboration and knowledge exchange across fields. This paper reports the protocol for a scoping review which aims to identify and characterise peer reviewed evidence describing bridging activities, between the ageing and disability fields. The purpose is to clarify the concepts underpinning bridging to inform the development of a taxonomy, and identify research strengths and gaps. Methods A scoping review will be conducted. We will search Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, PsycInfo, Sociological Abstracts and the Cochrane Library, to identify peer reviewed publications (reviews, experimental, observational, qualitative designs and expert commentaries) describing bridging activities. Grey literature, and articles not published in English will be excluded. Two investigators will independently complete article selection and data abstraction to minimise bias. A data extraction form will be iteratively developed and information from each publication will be extracted: (1) bibliographic, (2) methodological, (3) demographic, and (4) bridging information. Qualitative content analysis will be used to describe key concepts related to bridging. Conclusions To our knowledge, this will be the first scoping review to describe bridging of ageing and disability knowledge, services and policies. The findings will inform the development of a taxonomy to define models of bridging that can be implemented and further evaluated to enable integrated care and improve systems and services for those ageing with disability. Ethics and dissemination Ethics is not required because this is a scoping review of published literature. Findings will be disseminated through stakeholder meetings, conference presentations and peer reviewed publication.
AB - Introduction Bridging is a term used to describe activities, or tasks, used to promote collaboration and knowledge exchange across fields. This paper reports the protocol for a scoping review which aims to identify and characterise peer reviewed evidence describing bridging activities, between the ageing and disability fields. The purpose is to clarify the concepts underpinning bridging to inform the development of a taxonomy, and identify research strengths and gaps. Methods A scoping review will be conducted. We will search Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, PsycInfo, Sociological Abstracts and the Cochrane Library, to identify peer reviewed publications (reviews, experimental, observational, qualitative designs and expert commentaries) describing bridging activities. Grey literature, and articles not published in English will be excluded. Two investigators will independently complete article selection and data abstraction to minimise bias. A data extraction form will be iteratively developed and information from each publication will be extracted: (1) bibliographic, (2) methodological, (3) demographic, and (4) bridging information. Qualitative content analysis will be used to describe key concepts related to bridging. Conclusions To our knowledge, this will be the first scoping review to describe bridging of ageing and disability knowledge, services and policies. The findings will inform the development of a taxonomy to define models of bridging that can be implemented and further evaluated to enable integrated care and improve systems and services for those ageing with disability. Ethics and dissemination Ethics is not required because this is a scoping review of published literature. Findings will be disseminated through stakeholder meetings, conference presentations and peer reviewed publication.
KW - collaboration
KW - knowledge exchange
KW - scoping review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032676754&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016741
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016741
M3 - Article
C2 - 29074511
AN - SCOPUS:85032676754
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 7
SP - 1
EP - 5
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 10
M1 - e016741
ER -