Campaigns and Social Media Communications

A Look at Digital Campaigning in the 2010 U.K. General Election

Michael JENSEN, Nick Anstead

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

Abstract

Social media are said to have the potential to transform relationships between political parties, candidates, and citizens. This chapter is a study of social media use at different levels in the 2010 United Kingdom general election to see to what extent that potential is realized. The research compares the use of Twitter by the national level of the campaign, composed of the three major parties, and their leaders, as well as the campaigns of the three major parties across the nine electoral districts in England's second city, Birmingham. It examines the candidates and parties’ that various informational and engagement strategies at the national and Birmingham levels of the campaign with respect to their campaign functions. The analysis is carried out using natural language processing to computerize the content analysis. The findings reveal that social media are used at both levels, primarily for the undirectional transfer of information rather than for engagement. However, at the Birmingham level of the campaign there appears to be significantly greater emphasis on the creation of personal connections between candidates and the public than at the national level of the campaign. This suggests that lower profile candidates use social media in a compensatory manner, offsetting their limited media coverage which voters typically rely on in getting to know the candidates.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Internet and Democracy in Global Perspective
EditorsBernard Grofman, Alexander H Trechsel, Mark Franklin
Place of PublicationCham, Switzerland
PublisherSpringer
Pages57-81
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)9783319043524
ISBN (Print)9783319043517
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Publication series

NameStudies in Public Choice
PublisherSpringer
ISSN (Print)0924-4700

Fingerprint

social media
communications
campaign
election
candidacy
electoral district
twitter
content analysis
coverage
leader
citizen
language

Cite this

JENSEN, M., & Anstead, N. (2014). Campaigns and Social Media Communications: A Look at Digital Campaigning in the 2010 U.K. General Election. In B. Grofman, A. H. Trechsel, & M. Franklin (Eds.), The Internet and Democracy in Global Perspective (pp. 57-81). (Studies in Public Choice). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04352-4_5
JENSEN, Michael ; Anstead, Nick. / Campaigns and Social Media Communications : A Look at Digital Campaigning in the 2010 U.K. General Election. The Internet and Democracy in Global Perspective. editor / Bernard Grofman ; Alexander H Trechsel ; Mark Franklin. Cham, Switzerland : Springer, 2014. pp. 57-81 (Studies in Public Choice).
@inbook{69e9c2c4fbc44e47b859f89974946422,
title = "Campaigns and Social Media Communications: A Look at Digital Campaigning in the 2010 U.K. General Election",
abstract = "Social media are said to have the potential to transform relationships between political parties, candidates, and citizens. This chapter is a study of social media use at different levels in the 2010 United Kingdom general election to see to what extent that potential is realized. The research compares the use of Twitter by the national level of the campaign, composed of the three major parties, and their leaders, as well as the campaigns of the three major parties across the nine electoral districts in England's second city, Birmingham. It examines the candidates and parties’ that various informational and engagement strategies at the national and Birmingham levels of the campaign with respect to their campaign functions. The analysis is carried out using natural language processing to computerize the content analysis. The findings reveal that social media are used at both levels, primarily for the undirectional transfer of information rather than for engagement. However, at the Birmingham level of the campaign there appears to be significantly greater emphasis on the creation of personal connections between candidates and the public than at the national level of the campaign. This suggests that lower profile candidates use social media in a compensatory manner, offsetting their limited media coverage which voters typically rely on in getting to know the candidates.",
author = "Michael JENSEN and Nick Anstead",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-04352-4_5",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319043517",
series = "Studies in Public Choice",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "57--81",
editor = "Bernard Grofman and Trechsel, {Alexander H} and Mark Franklin",
booktitle = "The Internet and Democracy in Global Perspective",
address = "Netherlands",

}

JENSEN, M & Anstead, N 2014, Campaigns and Social Media Communications: A Look at Digital Campaigning in the 2010 U.K. General Election. in B Grofman, AH Trechsel & M Franklin (eds), The Internet and Democracy in Global Perspective. Studies in Public Choice, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 57-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04352-4_5

Campaigns and Social Media Communications : A Look at Digital Campaigning in the 2010 U.K. General Election. / JENSEN, Michael; Anstead, Nick.

The Internet and Democracy in Global Perspective. ed. / Bernard Grofman; Alexander H Trechsel; Mark Franklin. Cham, Switzerland : Springer, 2014. p. 57-81 (Studies in Public Choice).

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Campaigns and Social Media Communications

T2 - A Look at Digital Campaigning in the 2010 U.K. General Election

AU - JENSEN, Michael

AU - Anstead, Nick

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Social media are said to have the potential to transform relationships between political parties, candidates, and citizens. This chapter is a study of social media use at different levels in the 2010 United Kingdom general election to see to what extent that potential is realized. The research compares the use of Twitter by the national level of the campaign, composed of the three major parties, and their leaders, as well as the campaigns of the three major parties across the nine electoral districts in England's second city, Birmingham. It examines the candidates and parties’ that various informational and engagement strategies at the national and Birmingham levels of the campaign with respect to their campaign functions. The analysis is carried out using natural language processing to computerize the content analysis. The findings reveal that social media are used at both levels, primarily for the undirectional transfer of information rather than for engagement. However, at the Birmingham level of the campaign there appears to be significantly greater emphasis on the creation of personal connections between candidates and the public than at the national level of the campaign. This suggests that lower profile candidates use social media in a compensatory manner, offsetting their limited media coverage which voters typically rely on in getting to know the candidates.

AB - Social media are said to have the potential to transform relationships between political parties, candidates, and citizens. This chapter is a study of social media use at different levels in the 2010 United Kingdom general election to see to what extent that potential is realized. The research compares the use of Twitter by the national level of the campaign, composed of the three major parties, and their leaders, as well as the campaigns of the three major parties across the nine electoral districts in England's second city, Birmingham. It examines the candidates and parties’ that various informational and engagement strategies at the national and Birmingham levels of the campaign with respect to their campaign functions. The analysis is carried out using natural language processing to computerize the content analysis. The findings reveal that social media are used at both levels, primarily for the undirectional transfer of information rather than for engagement. However, at the Birmingham level of the campaign there appears to be significantly greater emphasis on the creation of personal connections between candidates and the public than at the national level of the campaign. This suggests that lower profile candidates use social media in a compensatory manner, offsetting their limited media coverage which voters typically rely on in getting to know the candidates.

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/campaigns-social-media-communications-look-digital-campaigning-2010-uk-general-election

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-04352-4_5

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-04352-4_5

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319043517

T3 - Studies in Public Choice

SP - 57

EP - 81

BT - The Internet and Democracy in Global Perspective

A2 - Grofman, Bernard

A2 - Trechsel, Alexander H

A2 - Franklin, Mark

PB - Springer

CY - Cham, Switzerland

ER -

JENSEN M, Anstead N. Campaigns and Social Media Communications: A Look at Digital Campaigning in the 2010 U.K. General Election. In Grofman B, Trechsel AH, Franklin M, editors, The Internet and Democracy in Global Perspective. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 2014. p. 57-81. (Studies in Public Choice). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04352-4_5