Can a professional development workshop with follow-up alter practitioner behaviour and outcomes for neck pain patients? A randomised controlled trial

L. S. Chipchase, R. Cavaleri, G. Jull

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Continuing professional development (CPD) is a fundamental component of physiotherapy practice. Follow-up sessions provide opportunity for the refinement of skills developed during CPD workshops. However, it is necessary to identify if such opportunity translates to improved physiotherapist performance and patient outcomes. Objectives: To determine whether a traditional CPD workshop with a follow-up session with the educator is more likely to change physiotherapists' practice behaviour and patient outcomes than a traditional workshop with no opportunity for follow-up. Design: A single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Methods: Participants were stratified and randomly allocated to the intervention and control groups. The control group participated in a two-day workshop dedicated towards the management of neck disorders. The intervention group completed the two-day workshop and attended a five-hour follow-up session one month later. Outcome measures included self-reported physiotherapist practice behaviour and confidence, as well as patient clinical outcomes using the Neck Disability Index. Results: While all participants exhibited changes in confidence and practice behaviours, between-group differences were not significant for any response (p > 0.05). There were also no significant differences between the groups in terms of patient outcomes (Neck Disability Index: F = 0.36, p = 0.56). Conclusion: A single follow-up session to a traditional workshop is insufficient to significantly influence practice behaviours or patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-93
Number of pages7
JournalManual Therapy
Volume25
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neck Pain
Randomized Controlled Trials
Education
Physical Therapists
Neck
Control Groups
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Cite this

@article{5c67dcb606114647a3026605adcf3198,
title = "Can a professional development workshop with follow-up alter practitioner behaviour and outcomes for neck pain patients? A randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "Background: Continuing professional development (CPD) is a fundamental component of physiotherapy practice. Follow-up sessions provide opportunity for the refinement of skills developed during CPD workshops. However, it is necessary to identify if such opportunity translates to improved physiotherapist performance and patient outcomes. Objectives: To determine whether a traditional CPD workshop with a follow-up session with the educator is more likely to change physiotherapists' practice behaviour and patient outcomes than a traditional workshop with no opportunity for follow-up. Design: A single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Methods: Participants were stratified and randomly allocated to the intervention and control groups. The control group participated in a two-day workshop dedicated towards the management of neck disorders. The intervention group completed the two-day workshop and attended a five-hour follow-up session one month later. Outcome measures included self-reported physiotherapist practice behaviour and confidence, as well as patient clinical outcomes using the Neck Disability Index. Results: While all participants exhibited changes in confidence and practice behaviours, between-group differences were not significant for any response (p > 0.05). There were also no significant differences between the groups in terms of patient outcomes (Neck Disability Index: F = 0.36, p = 0.56). Conclusion: A single follow-up session to a traditional workshop is insufficient to significantly influence practice behaviours or patient outcomes.",
keywords = "Neck pain, Patient outcomes, Professional development",
author = "Chipchase, {L. S.} and R. Cavaleri and G. Jull",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.math.2016.06.010",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "87--93",
journal = "Musculoskeletal Science and Practice",
issn = "1356-689X",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

}

Can a professional development workshop with follow-up alter practitioner behaviour and outcomes for neck pain patients? A randomised controlled trial. / Chipchase, L. S.; Cavaleri, R.; Jull, G.

In: Manual Therapy, Vol. 25, 01.09.2016, p. 87-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can a professional development workshop with follow-up alter practitioner behaviour and outcomes for neck pain patients? A randomised controlled trial

AU - Chipchase, L. S.

AU - Cavaleri, R.

AU - Jull, G.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Background: Continuing professional development (CPD) is a fundamental component of physiotherapy practice. Follow-up sessions provide opportunity for the refinement of skills developed during CPD workshops. However, it is necessary to identify if such opportunity translates to improved physiotherapist performance and patient outcomes. Objectives: To determine whether a traditional CPD workshop with a follow-up session with the educator is more likely to change physiotherapists' practice behaviour and patient outcomes than a traditional workshop with no opportunity for follow-up. Design: A single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Methods: Participants were stratified and randomly allocated to the intervention and control groups. The control group participated in a two-day workshop dedicated towards the management of neck disorders. The intervention group completed the two-day workshop and attended a five-hour follow-up session one month later. Outcome measures included self-reported physiotherapist practice behaviour and confidence, as well as patient clinical outcomes using the Neck Disability Index. Results: While all participants exhibited changes in confidence and practice behaviours, between-group differences were not significant for any response (p > 0.05). There were also no significant differences between the groups in terms of patient outcomes (Neck Disability Index: F = 0.36, p = 0.56). Conclusion: A single follow-up session to a traditional workshop is insufficient to significantly influence practice behaviours or patient outcomes.

AB - Background: Continuing professional development (CPD) is a fundamental component of physiotherapy practice. Follow-up sessions provide opportunity for the refinement of skills developed during CPD workshops. However, it is necessary to identify if such opportunity translates to improved physiotherapist performance and patient outcomes. Objectives: To determine whether a traditional CPD workshop with a follow-up session with the educator is more likely to change physiotherapists' practice behaviour and patient outcomes than a traditional workshop with no opportunity for follow-up. Design: A single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Methods: Participants were stratified and randomly allocated to the intervention and control groups. The control group participated in a two-day workshop dedicated towards the management of neck disorders. The intervention group completed the two-day workshop and attended a five-hour follow-up session one month later. Outcome measures included self-reported physiotherapist practice behaviour and confidence, as well as patient clinical outcomes using the Neck Disability Index. Results: While all participants exhibited changes in confidence and practice behaviours, between-group differences were not significant for any response (p > 0.05). There were also no significant differences between the groups in terms of patient outcomes (Neck Disability Index: F = 0.36, p = 0.56). Conclusion: A single follow-up session to a traditional workshop is insufficient to significantly influence practice behaviours or patient outcomes.

KW - Neck pain

KW - Patient outcomes

KW - Professional development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976448607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.math.2016.06.010

DO - 10.1016/j.math.2016.06.010

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 87

EP - 93

JO - Musculoskeletal Science and Practice

JF - Musculoskeletal Science and Practice

SN - 1356-689X

ER -