Can an indicator of river health be related to assessments from a catchment-scale sediment model?

Evan Harrison, Richard Norris, Scott Wilkinson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The accumulation of sand and fine gravel (<5 mm diameter) on riverbeds can adversely affect benthic macroinvertebrates, which are good indicators of the ecological health of rivers. The possibility arises, therefore, that predictions of sedimentation could form a useful proxy for indicating the health of a river. The Sediment River Network Model (SedNet) constructs sediment budgets to predict the depth of bed material accumulation (BMA) in each link of a river network. This study tests whether the predicted BMA depth was associated with spatial differences in macroinvertebrate community structure, in the Upper Murrumbidgee River catchment of southeast Australia. There was a significant, albeit limited, correlation. Riffle sites with low BMA depth (0–0.01 m) had a significantly different macroinvertebrate community structure compared to sites with medium (0.01–0.3 m) or high (>0.3 m) BMA depth. At these sites, taxa sensitive to habitat were in greater abundance when BMA depth was low. Additionally, riffle sites with high predicted BMA depth had lower values for three macroinvertebrate community structure measures—AUSRIVAS observed-to-expected (OE) taxa ratio, Ephemeroptera abundance and Plecoptera abundance. There was no significant difference in macroinvertebrate community structure between sites with medium and high levels of BMA depth. Possible reasons for this result are: (1) there may have been few sites in the high and medium categories to provide sufficient statistical power to detect a significant difference; (2) spatial variation in BMA depth within SedNet river links; or (3) only a minimal amount of BMA is required to change community structure. To further define spatial variation in biological damage from BMA, data are required on the spatial scale of variations in BMA depth and damage to macroinvertebrate community structure
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)49-64
    Number of pages16
    JournalHydrobiologia
    Volume600
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    catchment
    sediments
    rivers
    community structure
    river
    macroinvertebrates
    macroinvertebrate
    sediment
    spatial variation
    damage
    riffle
    Plecoptera
    Ephemeroptera
    gravel
    health
    indicator
    sand
    habitat
    habitats

    Cite this

    Harrison, Evan ; Norris, Richard ; Wilkinson, Scott. / Can an indicator of river health be related to assessments from a catchment-scale sediment model?. In: Hydrobiologia. 2007 ; Vol. 600, No. 1. pp. 49-64.
    @article{88551aff298d48c88664b8a9157f0f77,
    title = "Can an indicator of river health be related to assessments from a catchment-scale sediment model?",
    abstract = "The accumulation of sand and fine gravel (<5 mm diameter) on riverbeds can adversely affect benthic macroinvertebrates, which are good indicators of the ecological health of rivers. The possibility arises, therefore, that predictions of sedimentation could form a useful proxy for indicating the health of a river. The Sediment River Network Model (SedNet) constructs sediment budgets to predict the depth of bed material accumulation (BMA) in each link of a river network. This study tests whether the predicted BMA depth was associated with spatial differences in macroinvertebrate community structure, in the Upper Murrumbidgee River catchment of southeast Australia. There was a significant, albeit limited, correlation. Riffle sites with low BMA depth (0–0.01 m) had a significantly different macroinvertebrate community structure compared to sites with medium (0.01–0.3 m) or high (>0.3 m) BMA depth. At these sites, taxa sensitive to habitat were in greater abundance when BMA depth was low. Additionally, riffle sites with high predicted BMA depth had lower values for three macroinvertebrate community structure measures—AUSRIVAS observed-to-expected (OE) taxa ratio, Ephemeroptera abundance and Plecoptera abundance. There was no significant difference in macroinvertebrate community structure between sites with medium and high levels of BMA depth. Possible reasons for this result are: (1) there may have been few sites in the high and medium categories to provide sufficient statistical power to detect a significant difference; (2) spatial variation in BMA depth within SedNet river links; or (3) only a minimal amount of BMA is required to change community structure. To further define spatial variation in biological damage from BMA, data are required on the spatial scale of variations in BMA depth and damage to macroinvertebrate community structure",
    author = "Evan Harrison and Richard Norris and Scott Wilkinson",
    year = "2007",
    doi = "10.1007/s10750-007-9175-1",
    language = "English",
    volume = "600",
    pages = "49--64",
    journal = "Hydrobiologia",
    issn = "0018-8158",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "1",

    }

    Can an indicator of river health be related to assessments from a catchment-scale sediment model? / Harrison, Evan; Norris, Richard; Wilkinson, Scott.

    In: Hydrobiologia, Vol. 600, No. 1, 2007, p. 49-64.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Can an indicator of river health be related to assessments from a catchment-scale sediment model?

    AU - Harrison, Evan

    AU - Norris, Richard

    AU - Wilkinson, Scott

    PY - 2007

    Y1 - 2007

    N2 - The accumulation of sand and fine gravel (<5 mm diameter) on riverbeds can adversely affect benthic macroinvertebrates, which are good indicators of the ecological health of rivers. The possibility arises, therefore, that predictions of sedimentation could form a useful proxy for indicating the health of a river. The Sediment River Network Model (SedNet) constructs sediment budgets to predict the depth of bed material accumulation (BMA) in each link of a river network. This study tests whether the predicted BMA depth was associated with spatial differences in macroinvertebrate community structure, in the Upper Murrumbidgee River catchment of southeast Australia. There was a significant, albeit limited, correlation. Riffle sites with low BMA depth (0–0.01 m) had a significantly different macroinvertebrate community structure compared to sites with medium (0.01–0.3 m) or high (>0.3 m) BMA depth. At these sites, taxa sensitive to habitat were in greater abundance when BMA depth was low. Additionally, riffle sites with high predicted BMA depth had lower values for three macroinvertebrate community structure measures—AUSRIVAS observed-to-expected (OE) taxa ratio, Ephemeroptera abundance and Plecoptera abundance. There was no significant difference in macroinvertebrate community structure between sites with medium and high levels of BMA depth. Possible reasons for this result are: (1) there may have been few sites in the high and medium categories to provide sufficient statistical power to detect a significant difference; (2) spatial variation in BMA depth within SedNet river links; or (3) only a minimal amount of BMA is required to change community structure. To further define spatial variation in biological damage from BMA, data are required on the spatial scale of variations in BMA depth and damage to macroinvertebrate community structure

    AB - The accumulation of sand and fine gravel (<5 mm diameter) on riverbeds can adversely affect benthic macroinvertebrates, which are good indicators of the ecological health of rivers. The possibility arises, therefore, that predictions of sedimentation could form a useful proxy for indicating the health of a river. The Sediment River Network Model (SedNet) constructs sediment budgets to predict the depth of bed material accumulation (BMA) in each link of a river network. This study tests whether the predicted BMA depth was associated with spatial differences in macroinvertebrate community structure, in the Upper Murrumbidgee River catchment of southeast Australia. There was a significant, albeit limited, correlation. Riffle sites with low BMA depth (0–0.01 m) had a significantly different macroinvertebrate community structure compared to sites with medium (0.01–0.3 m) or high (>0.3 m) BMA depth. At these sites, taxa sensitive to habitat were in greater abundance when BMA depth was low. Additionally, riffle sites with high predicted BMA depth had lower values for three macroinvertebrate community structure measures—AUSRIVAS observed-to-expected (OE) taxa ratio, Ephemeroptera abundance and Plecoptera abundance. There was no significant difference in macroinvertebrate community structure between sites with medium and high levels of BMA depth. Possible reasons for this result are: (1) there may have been few sites in the high and medium categories to provide sufficient statistical power to detect a significant difference; (2) spatial variation in BMA depth within SedNet river links; or (3) only a minimal amount of BMA is required to change community structure. To further define spatial variation in biological damage from BMA, data are required on the spatial scale of variations in BMA depth and damage to macroinvertebrate community structure

    U2 - 10.1007/s10750-007-9175-1

    DO - 10.1007/s10750-007-9175-1

    M3 - Article

    VL - 600

    SP - 49

    EP - 64

    JO - Hydrobiologia

    JF - Hydrobiologia

    SN - 0018-8158

    IS - 1

    ER -