Can pharmacy assistants play a greater role in public health programs in community pharmacies? Lessons from a chlamydia screening study in Canberra, Australia

Louise Deeks, Gabrielle COOPER, Marian J. Currie, Sarah J. Martin, Rhian PARKER, Rendry Del Rosario, Jane S. Hocking, Francis J. Bowden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the engagement of pharmacy assistants (PA) in public health service provision. Objective: To explore the experiences of PA participating in a study to determine whether a cash reward, offered to consumers and pharmacy businesses, increased participation in community pharmacy-based chlamydia screening. Methods: PA experience of the study education and training package, participant recruitment and conducting screening (providing information about chlamydia, specimen collection and handling urine samples) were evaluated using knowledge assessment, a questionnaire and focus groups. Results: Twenty PA participated in the study: 15 (75%) completed all education and training components, 20 (100%) completed the questionnaire and 10 (50%) attended a focus group. PA rated all education and training components as effective (mean visual analog scale scores >8.5). Most PA (13/18, 72.2%) did not support/were unsure about continuing the program, citing the 25% repeat testing rate (presumed to relate to the cash reward) and privacy/confidentiality issues as reasons. Qualitative analysis suggested that minimizing repeat testing, improved workload management and recognition of, and remuneration for, education and training would make this model more acceptable to PA. Conclusion: Findings from this study support the assertion that PA can play a significant role in public health initiatives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)801-806
Number of pages6
JournalResearch in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Chlamydia
Pharmacies
Public health
Screening
Public Health
Education
Specimen Handling
Testing
Focus Groups
Reward
Remuneration
United States Public Health Service
Privacy
Confidentiality
Workload
Visual Analog Scale
Industry
Urine

Cite this

Deeks, Louise ; COOPER, Gabrielle ; Currie, Marian J. ; Martin, Sarah J. ; PARKER, Rhian ; Del Rosario, Rendry ; Hocking, Jane S. ; Bowden, Francis J. / Can pharmacy assistants play a greater role in public health programs in community pharmacies? Lessons from a chlamydia screening study in Canberra, Australia. In: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 2014 ; Vol. 10, No. 5. pp. 801-806.
@article{4d5ca1822eea4d279425bdc878c3032a,
title = "Can pharmacy assistants play a greater role in public health programs in community pharmacies? Lessons from a chlamydia screening study in Canberra, Australia",
abstract = "Background: Little is known about the engagement of pharmacy assistants (PA) in public health service provision. Objective: To explore the experiences of PA participating in a study to determine whether a cash reward, offered to consumers and pharmacy businesses, increased participation in community pharmacy-based chlamydia screening. Methods: PA experience of the study education and training package, participant recruitment and conducting screening (providing information about chlamydia, specimen collection and handling urine samples) were evaluated using knowledge assessment, a questionnaire and focus groups. Results: Twenty PA participated in the study: 15 (75{\%}) completed all education and training components, 20 (100{\%}) completed the questionnaire and 10 (50{\%}) attended a focus group. PA rated all education and training components as effective (mean visual analog scale scores >8.5). Most PA (13/18, 72.2{\%}) did not support/were unsure about continuing the program, citing the 25{\%} repeat testing rate (presumed to relate to the cash reward) and privacy/confidentiality issues as reasons. Qualitative analysis suggested that minimizing repeat testing, improved workload management and recognition of, and remuneration for, education and training would make this model more acceptable to PA. Conclusion: Findings from this study support the assertion that PA can play a significant role in public health initiatives.",
keywords = "Chlamydia infection, Mass screening, Pharmacy, Pharmacy assistants, Public health",
author = "Louise Deeks and Gabrielle COOPER and Currie, {Marian J.} and Martin, {Sarah J.} and Rhian PARKER and {Del Rosario}, Rendry and Hocking, {Jane S.} and Bowden, {Francis J.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.11.006",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "801--806",
journal = "Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy",
issn = "1551-7411",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Can pharmacy assistants play a greater role in public health programs in community pharmacies? Lessons from a chlamydia screening study in Canberra, Australia. / Deeks, Louise; COOPER, Gabrielle; Currie, Marian J.; Martin, Sarah J.; PARKER, Rhian; Del Rosario, Rendry; Hocking, Jane S.; Bowden, Francis J.

In: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Vol. 10, No. 5, 2014, p. 801-806.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can pharmacy assistants play a greater role in public health programs in community pharmacies? Lessons from a chlamydia screening study in Canberra, Australia

AU - Deeks, Louise

AU - COOPER, Gabrielle

AU - Currie, Marian J.

AU - Martin, Sarah J.

AU - PARKER, Rhian

AU - Del Rosario, Rendry

AU - Hocking, Jane S.

AU - Bowden, Francis J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: Little is known about the engagement of pharmacy assistants (PA) in public health service provision. Objective: To explore the experiences of PA participating in a study to determine whether a cash reward, offered to consumers and pharmacy businesses, increased participation in community pharmacy-based chlamydia screening. Methods: PA experience of the study education and training package, participant recruitment and conducting screening (providing information about chlamydia, specimen collection and handling urine samples) were evaluated using knowledge assessment, a questionnaire and focus groups. Results: Twenty PA participated in the study: 15 (75%) completed all education and training components, 20 (100%) completed the questionnaire and 10 (50%) attended a focus group. PA rated all education and training components as effective (mean visual analog scale scores >8.5). Most PA (13/18, 72.2%) did not support/were unsure about continuing the program, citing the 25% repeat testing rate (presumed to relate to the cash reward) and privacy/confidentiality issues as reasons. Qualitative analysis suggested that minimizing repeat testing, improved workload management and recognition of, and remuneration for, education and training would make this model more acceptable to PA. Conclusion: Findings from this study support the assertion that PA can play a significant role in public health initiatives.

AB - Background: Little is known about the engagement of pharmacy assistants (PA) in public health service provision. Objective: To explore the experiences of PA participating in a study to determine whether a cash reward, offered to consumers and pharmacy businesses, increased participation in community pharmacy-based chlamydia screening. Methods: PA experience of the study education and training package, participant recruitment and conducting screening (providing information about chlamydia, specimen collection and handling urine samples) were evaluated using knowledge assessment, a questionnaire and focus groups. Results: Twenty PA participated in the study: 15 (75%) completed all education and training components, 20 (100%) completed the questionnaire and 10 (50%) attended a focus group. PA rated all education and training components as effective (mean visual analog scale scores >8.5). Most PA (13/18, 72.2%) did not support/were unsure about continuing the program, citing the 25% repeat testing rate (presumed to relate to the cash reward) and privacy/confidentiality issues as reasons. Qualitative analysis suggested that minimizing repeat testing, improved workload management and recognition of, and remuneration for, education and training would make this model more acceptable to PA. Conclusion: Findings from this study support the assertion that PA can play a significant role in public health initiatives.

KW - Chlamydia infection

KW - Mass screening

KW - Pharmacy

KW - Pharmacy assistants

KW - Public health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926170355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/pharmacy-assistants-play-greater-role-public-health-programs-community-pharmacies-lessons-chlamydia

U2 - 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.11.006

DO - 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.11.006

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 801

EP - 806

JO - Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

JF - Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

SN - 1551-7411

IS - 5

ER -