Can Political Science History be Neutral?

James Farr, John Gunnell, Raymond Seidelman, John S. Dryzek, Stephen T. Leonard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the December 1988 issue of this Review, John Dryzek and Stephen Leonard argued the need for “context-sensitive” histories of the discipline of political science. In their view, disciplinary history must guide practical inquiry if it is to be most useful. The course of their argument draws the criticisms of three political scientists concerned about the history of political science—James Farr, John Gunnell, and Raymond Seidelman. Dryzek and Leonard respond to their critics and underscore their own rationale for enhanced interest in the history of the discipline.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)587-607
Number of pages21
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
Volume84
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Can Political Science History be Neutral?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Farr, J., Gunnell, J., Seidelman, R., Dryzek, J. S., & Leonard, S. T. (1990). Can Political Science History be Neutral? American Political Science Review, 84(2), 587-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963537