Can the democratic ideal of participatory research be achieved? An inside look at an academic-indigenous community partnership

Margaret Cargo, Treena Delormier, Lucie Lévesque, Kahente Horn-Miller, Alex McComber, Ann C. Macaulay

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    31 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Democratic or equal participation in decision making is an ideal that community and academic stakeholders engaged in participatory research strive to achieve. This ideal, however, may compete with indigenous peoples' right to self-determination. Study objectives were to assess the perceived influence of multiple community (indigenous) and academic stakeholders engaged in the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project (KSDPP) across six domains of project decision making and to test the hypothesis that KSDPP would be directed by community stakeholders. Self-report surveys were completed by 51 stakeholders comprising the KSDPP Community Advisory Board (CAB), KSDPP staff, academic researchers and supervisory board members. KSDPP staff were perceived to share similar levels of influence with (i) CAB on maintaining partnership ethics and CAB activities and (ii) academic researchers on research and dissemination activities. KSDPP staff were perceived to carry significantly more influence than other stakeholders on decisions related to annual activities, program operations and intervention activities. CAB and staff were the perceived owners of KSDPP. The strong community leadership aligns KSDPP with a model of community-directed research and suggests that equitable participation - distinct from democratic or equal participation - is reflected by indigenous community partners exerting greater influence than academic partners in decision making.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)904-914
    Number of pages11
    JournalHealth Education Research
    Volume23
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2008

    Fingerprint

    chronic illness
    Research
    community
    school
    stakeholder
    staff
    Decision Making
    decision making
    participation
    supervisory board
    Research Personnel
    community research
    Personal Autonomy
    self-determination
    Ethics
    Self Report
    moral philosophy
    leadership

    Cite this

    Cargo, Margaret ; Delormier, Treena ; Lévesque, Lucie ; Horn-Miller, Kahente ; McComber, Alex ; Macaulay, Ann C. / Can the democratic ideal of participatory research be achieved? An inside look at an academic-indigenous community partnership. In: Health Education Research. 2008 ; Vol. 23, No. 5. pp. 904-914.
    @article{845d642fbc214266a5de95d59d2bc571,
    title = "Can the democratic ideal of participatory research be achieved? An inside look at an academic-indigenous community partnership",
    abstract = "Democratic or equal participation in decision making is an ideal that community and academic stakeholders engaged in participatory research strive to achieve. This ideal, however, may compete with indigenous peoples' right to self-determination. Study objectives were to assess the perceived influence of multiple community (indigenous) and academic stakeholders engaged in the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project (KSDPP) across six domains of project decision making and to test the hypothesis that KSDPP would be directed by community stakeholders. Self-report surveys were completed by 51 stakeholders comprising the KSDPP Community Advisory Board (CAB), KSDPP staff, academic researchers and supervisory board members. KSDPP staff were perceived to share similar levels of influence with (i) CAB on maintaining partnership ethics and CAB activities and (ii) academic researchers on research and dissemination activities. KSDPP staff were perceived to carry significantly more influence than other stakeholders on decisions related to annual activities, program operations and intervention activities. CAB and staff were the perceived owners of KSDPP. The strong community leadership aligns KSDPP with a model of community-directed research and suggests that equitable participation - distinct from democratic or equal participation - is reflected by indigenous community partners exerting greater influence than academic partners in decision making.",
    author = "Margaret Cargo and Treena Delormier and Lucie L{\'e}vesque and Kahente Horn-Miller and Alex McComber and Macaulay, {Ann C.}",
    year = "2008",
    month = "10",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1093/her/cym077",
    language = "English",
    volume = "23",
    pages = "904--914",
    journal = "Health Education Research",
    issn = "0268-1153",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "5",

    }

    Can the democratic ideal of participatory research be achieved? An inside look at an academic-indigenous community partnership. / Cargo, Margaret; Delormier, Treena; Lévesque, Lucie; Horn-Miller, Kahente; McComber, Alex; Macaulay, Ann C.

    In: Health Education Research, Vol. 23, No. 5, 01.10.2008, p. 904-914.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Can the democratic ideal of participatory research be achieved? An inside look at an academic-indigenous community partnership

    AU - Cargo, Margaret

    AU - Delormier, Treena

    AU - Lévesque, Lucie

    AU - Horn-Miller, Kahente

    AU - McComber, Alex

    AU - Macaulay, Ann C.

    PY - 2008/10/1

    Y1 - 2008/10/1

    N2 - Democratic or equal participation in decision making is an ideal that community and academic stakeholders engaged in participatory research strive to achieve. This ideal, however, may compete with indigenous peoples' right to self-determination. Study objectives were to assess the perceived influence of multiple community (indigenous) and academic stakeholders engaged in the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project (KSDPP) across six domains of project decision making and to test the hypothesis that KSDPP would be directed by community stakeholders. Self-report surveys were completed by 51 stakeholders comprising the KSDPP Community Advisory Board (CAB), KSDPP staff, academic researchers and supervisory board members. KSDPP staff were perceived to share similar levels of influence with (i) CAB on maintaining partnership ethics and CAB activities and (ii) academic researchers on research and dissemination activities. KSDPP staff were perceived to carry significantly more influence than other stakeholders on decisions related to annual activities, program operations and intervention activities. CAB and staff were the perceived owners of KSDPP. The strong community leadership aligns KSDPP with a model of community-directed research and suggests that equitable participation - distinct from democratic or equal participation - is reflected by indigenous community partners exerting greater influence than academic partners in decision making.

    AB - Democratic or equal participation in decision making is an ideal that community and academic stakeholders engaged in participatory research strive to achieve. This ideal, however, may compete with indigenous peoples' right to self-determination. Study objectives were to assess the perceived influence of multiple community (indigenous) and academic stakeholders engaged in the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project (KSDPP) across six domains of project decision making and to test the hypothesis that KSDPP would be directed by community stakeholders. Self-report surveys were completed by 51 stakeholders comprising the KSDPP Community Advisory Board (CAB), KSDPP staff, academic researchers and supervisory board members. KSDPP staff were perceived to share similar levels of influence with (i) CAB on maintaining partnership ethics and CAB activities and (ii) academic researchers on research and dissemination activities. KSDPP staff were perceived to carry significantly more influence than other stakeholders on decisions related to annual activities, program operations and intervention activities. CAB and staff were the perceived owners of KSDPP. The strong community leadership aligns KSDPP with a model of community-directed research and suggests that equitable participation - distinct from democratic or equal participation - is reflected by indigenous community partners exerting greater influence than academic partners in decision making.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52449111837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/her/cym077

    DO - 10.1093/her/cym077

    M3 - Article

    VL - 23

    SP - 904

    EP - 914

    JO - Health Education Research

    JF - Health Education Research

    SN - 0268-1153

    IS - 5

    ER -