Can the governance paradigm survive the rise of populism?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The governance paradigm has provided a dominant way of thinking about how to govern and found reflection in practice with the increased use of partnerships, networks and markets to deliver public services and programmes. The emergence of populism as a political force, however, calls into question the thinking behind the governance paradigm and some of its favoured tools for governing. Populism sees the task of governing in very different terms to that of the advocates and practitioners of governance. This article explores the populist challenge to governance. It shows that gaps in its analysis of a changed environment left the governance paradigm potentially open to populist attack. It explores how the governance paradigm might adapt to survive by developing either a more technical or a political dynamic to its presentation.
LanguageEnglish
Pages3-18
Number of pages16
JournalPolicy & Politics
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

Fingerprint

populism
governance
paradigm
public service
market
programme
analysis

Cite this

@article{d95e67d4e00f452c809635403a52d855,
title = "Can the governance paradigm survive the rise of populism?",
abstract = "The governance paradigm has provided a dominant way of thinking about how to govern and found reflection in practice with the increased use of partnerships, networks and markets to deliver public services and programmes. The emergence of populism as a political force, however, calls into question the thinking behind the governance paradigm and some of its favoured tools for governing. Populism sees the task of governing in very different terms to that of the advocates and practitioners of governance. This article explores the populist challenge to governance. It shows that gaps in its analysis of a changed environment left the governance paradigm potentially open to populist attack. It explores how the governance paradigm might adapt to survive by developing either a more technical or a political dynamic to its presentation.",
keywords = "populism, governance, networks, markets, anti-politics, metagovernance, trust",
author = "Gerry STOKER",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1332/030557318X15333033030897",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "3--18",
journal = "Policy and Politics",
issn = "0305-5736",
publisher = "Policy Press",
number = "1",

}

Can the governance paradigm survive the rise of populism? / STOKER, Gerry.

In: Policy & Politics, Vol. 47, No. 1, 01.2019, p. 3-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can the governance paradigm survive the rise of populism?

AU - STOKER, Gerry

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - The governance paradigm has provided a dominant way of thinking about how to govern and found reflection in practice with the increased use of partnerships, networks and markets to deliver public services and programmes. The emergence of populism as a political force, however, calls into question the thinking behind the governance paradigm and some of its favoured tools for governing. Populism sees the task of governing in very different terms to that of the advocates and practitioners of governance. This article explores the populist challenge to governance. It shows that gaps in its analysis of a changed environment left the governance paradigm potentially open to populist attack. It explores how the governance paradigm might adapt to survive by developing either a more technical or a political dynamic to its presentation.

AB - The governance paradigm has provided a dominant way of thinking about how to govern and found reflection in practice with the increased use of partnerships, networks and markets to deliver public services and programmes. The emergence of populism as a political force, however, calls into question the thinking behind the governance paradigm and some of its favoured tools for governing. Populism sees the task of governing in very different terms to that of the advocates and practitioners of governance. This article explores the populist challenge to governance. It shows that gaps in its analysis of a changed environment left the governance paradigm potentially open to populist attack. It explores how the governance paradigm might adapt to survive by developing either a more technical or a political dynamic to its presentation.

KW - populism

KW - governance

KW - networks

KW - markets

KW - anti-politics

KW - metagovernance

KW - trust

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/governance-paradigm-survive-rise-populism

U2 - 10.1332/030557318X15333033030897

DO - 10.1332/030557318X15333033030897

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 3

EP - 18

JO - Policy and Politics

T2 - Policy and Politics

JF - Policy and Politics

SN - 0305-5736

IS - 1

ER -