Can there be a human right to an essentially contested concept? The case of democracy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)
    6 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The idea of a human right to democracy has received substantial attention from political theorists, philosophers, and international lawyers. Arguments for its existence ignore the fact that democracy is the paradigm essentially contested concept, so cannot establish what a right to democracy would be a right to. I survey three responses to essential contestability. The first holds that history has decided upon liberal democracy, so essential contestation is a philosophical worry with few practical implications. The second seeks a broadly acceptable minimal definition of democracy. The third would deploy sophisticated empirical analysis to determine which aspects of democracy have desired positive effects. All three prove inadequate. The right to democracy must instead be understood as the right to engage the contestation at the core of the concept, through formative agency that determines what democracy should mean in practice in particular contexts.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)357-367
    Number of pages11
    JournalThe Journal of Politics
    Volume78
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    human rights
    democracy
    lawyer
    paradigm
    history

    Cite this

    @article{08ae98de8b1a4c59a07c3fdee8696f5b,
    title = "Can there be a human right to an essentially contested concept? The case of democracy",
    abstract = "The idea of a human right to democracy has received substantial attention from political theorists, philosophers, and international lawyers. Arguments for its existence ignore the fact that democracy is the paradigm essentially contested concept, so cannot establish what a right to democracy would be a right to. I survey three responses to essential contestability. The first holds that history has decided upon liberal democracy, so essential contestation is a philosophical worry with few practical implications. The second seeks a broadly acceptable minimal definition of democracy. The third would deploy sophisticated empirical analysis to determine which aspects of democracy have desired positive effects. All three prove inadequate. The right to democracy must instead be understood as the right to engage the contestation at the core of the concept, through formative agency that determines what democracy should mean in practice in particular contexts.",
    keywords = "Human rights, essentially contested concepts, democracy, human right to democracy, formative agency",
    author = "John DRYZEK",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1086/684585",
    language = "English",
    volume = "78",
    pages = "357--367",
    journal = "Journal of Politics",
    issn = "0022-3816",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "2",

    }

    Can there be a human right to an essentially contested concept? The case of democracy. / DRYZEK, John.

    In: The Journal of Politics, Vol. 78, No. 2, 2016, p. 357-367.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Can there be a human right to an essentially contested concept? The case of democracy

    AU - DRYZEK, John

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - The idea of a human right to democracy has received substantial attention from political theorists, philosophers, and international lawyers. Arguments for its existence ignore the fact that democracy is the paradigm essentially contested concept, so cannot establish what a right to democracy would be a right to. I survey three responses to essential contestability. The first holds that history has decided upon liberal democracy, so essential contestation is a philosophical worry with few practical implications. The second seeks a broadly acceptable minimal definition of democracy. The third would deploy sophisticated empirical analysis to determine which aspects of democracy have desired positive effects. All three prove inadequate. The right to democracy must instead be understood as the right to engage the contestation at the core of the concept, through formative agency that determines what democracy should mean in practice in particular contexts.

    AB - The idea of a human right to democracy has received substantial attention from political theorists, philosophers, and international lawyers. Arguments for its existence ignore the fact that democracy is the paradigm essentially contested concept, so cannot establish what a right to democracy would be a right to. I survey three responses to essential contestability. The first holds that history has decided upon liberal democracy, so essential contestation is a philosophical worry with few practical implications. The second seeks a broadly acceptable minimal definition of democracy. The third would deploy sophisticated empirical analysis to determine which aspects of democracy have desired positive effects. All three prove inadequate. The right to democracy must instead be understood as the right to engage the contestation at the core of the concept, through formative agency that determines what democracy should mean in practice in particular contexts.

    KW - Human rights

    KW - essentially contested concepts

    KW - democracy

    KW - human right to democracy

    KW - formative agency

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983356274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/human-right-essentially-contested-concept-case-democracy-1

    U2 - 10.1086/684585

    DO - 10.1086/684585

    M3 - Article

    VL - 78

    SP - 357

    EP - 367

    JO - Journal of Politics

    JF - Journal of Politics

    SN - 0022-3816

    IS - 2

    ER -