TY - JOUR
T1 - Canaries in the coalmine:
T2 - Stakeholder perspectives of medication management reviews for residents with dementia
AU - McDerby, Nicole
AU - Bail, Kasia
AU - Kosari, Sam
AU - Shield, Alison
AU - Peterson, Greg
AU - Dawda, Paresh
AU - Naunton, Mark
N1 - Funding Information:
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. NM was supported by a Commonwealth PhD scholarship: the Australian Government Research Training Program Stipend Scholarship .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Inc.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - Background: Residential medication management reviews (RMMRs) are the primary strategy enabling collaborative and individualised medication reviews in Australian residential aged care homes (RACHs). Residents with dementia often have complex health needs and care goals, which makes them a useful benchmark of health service efficacy. Objective: To analyse perspectives of pharmacists, general practitioners (GPs) and nurses on the suitability and delivery of the current RMMR model for residents with dementia; and to identify scope for improvement in medication review service delivery. Methods: Electronic surveys were distributed to the included health professions via professional agencies. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used to summarise quantitative variables. Qualitative data obtained from open-text responses underwent iterative thematic analysis. Two researchers independently conducted the thematic categorisation; data within responses was inductively coded, then codes were linked to identify emergent themes that described the data content. In a triangulated exploratory mixed method approach, the qualitative findings were used to explain the quantitative findings. Results: None of the participants agreed that the current program recommendation of a single RMMR every 24 months was suitable for the residents’ needs. Participants were more likely to use written, rather than verbal, means of communication during RMMRs. RMMRs were perceived to have minimal benefit if there was minimal face-to-face interaction between stakeholders. Individualised medicine management in relation to resident goals of care was the key benefit of RMMRs. Insufficient remuneration was the primary barrier to effective face-to-face collaboration and delivery of individualised resident care. Conclusions: Increasing support for stakeholder participation in face-to-face interactions during medication reviews may enable delivery of a more patient-centred service for residents with dementia and improve health professional satisfaction and engagement.
AB - Background: Residential medication management reviews (RMMRs) are the primary strategy enabling collaborative and individualised medication reviews in Australian residential aged care homes (RACHs). Residents with dementia often have complex health needs and care goals, which makes them a useful benchmark of health service efficacy. Objective: To analyse perspectives of pharmacists, general practitioners (GPs) and nurses on the suitability and delivery of the current RMMR model for residents with dementia; and to identify scope for improvement in medication review service delivery. Methods: Electronic surveys were distributed to the included health professions via professional agencies. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used to summarise quantitative variables. Qualitative data obtained from open-text responses underwent iterative thematic analysis. Two researchers independently conducted the thematic categorisation; data within responses was inductively coded, then codes were linked to identify emergent themes that described the data content. In a triangulated exploratory mixed method approach, the qualitative findings were used to explain the quantitative findings. Results: None of the participants agreed that the current program recommendation of a single RMMR every 24 months was suitable for the residents’ needs. Participants were more likely to use written, rather than verbal, means of communication during RMMRs. RMMRs were perceived to have minimal benefit if there was minimal face-to-face interaction between stakeholders. Individualised medicine management in relation to resident goals of care was the key benefit of RMMRs. Insufficient remuneration was the primary barrier to effective face-to-face collaboration and delivery of individualised resident care. Conclusions: Increasing support for stakeholder participation in face-to-face interactions during medication reviews may enable delivery of a more patient-centred service for residents with dementia and improve health professional satisfaction and engagement.
KW - Communication
KW - Dementia
KW - Interdisciplinary collaboration
KW - Medication review
KW - Nursing home
KW - Residential facilities
KW - pharmacist
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076558974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/6defd8b7-8a99-3bb2-8536-8ff5b28df76e/
U2 - 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.12.002
DO - 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.12.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85076558974
SN - 1551-7411
VL - 16
SP - 1220
EP - 1227
JO - Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
JF - Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
IS - 9
ER -