TY - JOUR
T1 - Carbon, community and governance
T2 - Is Nepal getting ready for REDD+
AU - Ojha, Hemant R.
AU - Khatri, Dil
AU - Shrestha, Krishna K.
AU - Bushley, Bryan
AU - Sharma, Naya
N1 - Funding Information:
Part of the evidences for this paper is drawn from a research project called ‘Paying for Ecosystem Services: Consequences and Alternatives’ led by The Swedish University of Agriculture, SLU and funded by The Swedish Research Council.
Funding Information:
The Hariyo Ban project supported by the USAID
Funding Information:
Nepal has made considerable progress in setting up a basic institutional framework for REDD þ readiness. Following Nepal’s selection by the World Bank’s Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) for financial support, the Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation (MFSC) moved quickly to create an institutional infrastructure for REDD þ readiness. It formed a three-tiered institutional framework consisting of the REDD Forestry and Climate Change (REDD) Cell; a multi-stakeholder REDD Working Group (RWG) with representation from government, experts, donors, and civil society organizations (CSOs); and a high-level, inter-ministerial REDD Apex Body. The RWG and Apex Body are the official forums for REDD þ policy development and approval. In addition to these official efforts, several international organizations and local CSOs have also taken various REDD þ readiness initiatives, including piloting activities to explore the social and technical viability of REDD þ at the national and subnational levels.1
Funding Information:
Note: ICIMOD, International Center for Integrated Mountain Development; DFID, Department for International Development, UK; FRA, Forest Resource Assessment Project funded by FINNIDA; NEFIN, Nepal Federation for Indigenous Nationalities; FECOFUN, Federation of Community Forestry Users, Nepal (FECOFUN); WWF, Worldwide Fund for Nature Conservation; NTNC, National Trust for Nature Conservation; SDC, Swiss Development Corporation; RECOFTC, International Center for People and Forest, Bangkok; MFSC, Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation. Source: Khatri and Paudel (2013).
PY - 2013/12/1
Y1 - 2013/12/1
N2 - Using a multilevel governance lens, this paper analyzes ongoing reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) readiness initiatives in Nepal. We present the evidence of what is happening around these preparatory activities in relation to handling forest tenure issues, stakeholder engagement, developing monitoring and verification mechanisms, and creating benefit-sharing mechanisms. Our aim is to assess whether Nepal is on its way to being ready for full-fledged REDD+ implementation in the next few years. The paper concludes that, while the REDD+ readiness process mobilizes diverse and opposing stakeholders through interactive forums, it pays little attention to basic governance issues such as defining carbon rights and who is authorized to make what decisions about REDD+ rules and practices. Moreover, despite some well-intentioned participatory pilot experiences, fundamental aspects of participation, equity, and fairness remain unaddressed.
AB - Using a multilevel governance lens, this paper analyzes ongoing reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) readiness initiatives in Nepal. We present the evidence of what is happening around these preparatory activities in relation to handling forest tenure issues, stakeholder engagement, developing monitoring and verification mechanisms, and creating benefit-sharing mechanisms. Our aim is to assess whether Nepal is on its way to being ready for full-fledged REDD+ implementation in the next few years. The paper concludes that, while the REDD+ readiness process mobilizes diverse and opposing stakeholders through interactive forums, it pays little attention to basic governance issues such as defining carbon rights and who is authorized to make what decisions about REDD+ rules and practices. Moreover, despite some well-intentioned participatory pilot experiences, fundamental aspects of participation, equity, and fairness remain unaddressed.
KW - carbon trade
KW - community forestry
KW - governance
KW - Nepal
KW - REDD
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889583132&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14728028.2013.856166
DO - 10.1080/14728028.2013.856166
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84889583132
SN - 1472-8028
VL - 22
SP - 216
EP - 229
JO - Forests Trees and Livelihoods
JF - Forests Trees and Livelihoods
IS - 4
ER -