Career development in higher education through group mentoring: A case study of desirable attributes and perceptions of a current programme

Raechel JOHNS, Justine McNamara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although group mentoring is not widely utilised in higher education settings, it has been viewed as successfully helping the research careers of academics (Walkington, Vanderheide, Hughes, 2008). This paper explores the results of a qualitative and quantitative study about perceptions of one university-based group mentoring programme. The results enable an understanding of challenges that might exist in attracting potential participants to a group mentoring programme. Results indicate that organisations implementing a group mentoring programme need to make sure goals and outcomes of the programme are properly communicated, and that these also need to align with academics’ priorities for career development.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-87
Number of pages9
JournalAustralian Journal of Career Development
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

mentoring
career
education
Group
university

Cite this

@article{6925f15cb0f342269cbeceffee79b832,
title = "Career development in higher education through group mentoring: A case study of desirable attributes and perceptions of a current programme",
abstract = "Although group mentoring is not widely utilised in higher education settings, it has been viewed as successfully helping the research careers of academics (Walkington, Vanderheide, Hughes, 2008). This paper explores the results of a qualitative and quantitative study about perceptions of one university-based group mentoring programme. The results enable an understanding of challenges that might exist in attracting potential participants to a group mentoring programme. Results indicate that organisations implementing a group mentoring programme need to make sure goals and outcomes of the programme are properly communicated, and that these also need to align with academics’ priorities for career development.",
keywords = "Academic, academic development, group mentoring, higher education, mentoring, mixed methods, university.",
author = "Raechel JOHNS and Justine McNamara",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/1038416214528883",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "79--87",
journal = "Australian Journal of Career Development",
issn = "1038-4162",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Career development in higher education through group mentoring: A case study of desirable attributes and perceptions of a current programme

AU - JOHNS, Raechel

AU - McNamara, Justine

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Although group mentoring is not widely utilised in higher education settings, it has been viewed as successfully helping the research careers of academics (Walkington, Vanderheide, Hughes, 2008). This paper explores the results of a qualitative and quantitative study about perceptions of one university-based group mentoring programme. The results enable an understanding of challenges that might exist in attracting potential participants to a group mentoring programme. Results indicate that organisations implementing a group mentoring programme need to make sure goals and outcomes of the programme are properly communicated, and that these also need to align with academics’ priorities for career development.

AB - Although group mentoring is not widely utilised in higher education settings, it has been viewed as successfully helping the research careers of academics (Walkington, Vanderheide, Hughes, 2008). This paper explores the results of a qualitative and quantitative study about perceptions of one university-based group mentoring programme. The results enable an understanding of challenges that might exist in attracting potential participants to a group mentoring programme. Results indicate that organisations implementing a group mentoring programme need to make sure goals and outcomes of the programme are properly communicated, and that these also need to align with academics’ priorities for career development.

KW - Academic

KW - academic development

KW - group mentoring

KW - higher education

KW - mentoring

KW - mixed methods

KW - university.

U2 - 10.1177/1038416214528883

DO - 10.1177/1038416214528883

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 79

EP - 87

JO - Australian Journal of Career Development

JF - Australian Journal of Career Development

SN - 1038-4162

IS - 2

ER -