Abstract
Whether the classification standard used by the office of Film and Literature Classification relating to sexually explicit material is appropriate - if not, what standard should replace it - article confined to analysis of films and publications - excludes computer software - other theoretical approaches to obscenity in Canada and United States examined - harms-based test proposed - Australian statutory provisions critiqued.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 25-58 |
| Number of pages | 34 |
| Journal | Canberra Law Review |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Censorship : a Comparative Approach Offering a New Theoretical Basis for Classification in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver