Abstract
| Original language | Undefined |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 240-249 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Freshwater Science |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Cite this
}
Challenges for evidence-based environmental management: What is acceptable and sufficient evidence of causation? / Nichols, S.J.; Peat, M.; Webb, Angus.
In: Freshwater Science, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2017, p. 240-249.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenges for evidence-based environmental management: What is acceptable and sufficient evidence of causation?
AU - Nichols, S.J.
AU - Peat, M.
AU - Webb, Angus
N1 - cited By 3
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Investigators attempting to demonstrate causal relationships in environmental systems face challenges associated with natural variability, multiple stressors, the difficulty of performing rigorous experiments, and the time and money required to undertake such studies. Rapid, transparent, and logical methods are needed to synthesize and evaluate evidence from multiple existing scientific research studies. Eco Evidence was developed for this purpose. It provides a synthesis method, online database, and analysis software for use in environmental causal assessments. Eco Evidence provides a definition of ‘acceptable’ and ‘sufficient evidence’ to establish causation. To illustrate its capabilities, we provide an example in which Eco Evidence informed a review of groundwater abstraction limits for environmental flow guidelines in the Australian Capital Territory. The synthesis of available evidence from peer-reviewed and unpublished sources was deemed sufficient and acceptable to inform a decision to keep groundwater abstraction limits <10% of long-term recharge. However, the definitions of acceptable and sufficient evidence might differ based upon the reasons for conducting an environmental causal assessment and on the perceived risk and consequences of making particular decisions.
AB - Investigators attempting to demonstrate causal relationships in environmental systems face challenges associated with natural variability, multiple stressors, the difficulty of performing rigorous experiments, and the time and money required to undertake such studies. Rapid, transparent, and logical methods are needed to synthesize and evaluate evidence from multiple existing scientific research studies. Eco Evidence was developed for this purpose. It provides a synthesis method, online database, and analysis software for use in environmental causal assessments. Eco Evidence provides a definition of ‘acceptable’ and ‘sufficient evidence’ to establish causation. To illustrate its capabilities, we provide an example in which Eco Evidence informed a review of groundwater abstraction limits for environmental flow guidelines in the Australian Capital Territory. The synthesis of available evidence from peer-reviewed and unpublished sources was deemed sufficient and acceptable to inform a decision to keep groundwater abstraction limits <10% of long-term recharge. However, the definitions of acceptable and sufficient evidence might differ based upon the reasons for conducting an environmental causal assessment and on the perceived risk and consequences of making particular decisions.
U2 - 10.1086/690106
DO - 10.1086/690106
M3 - Article
VL - 36
SP - 240
EP - 249
JO - Journal of the North American Benthological Society
JF - Journal of the North American Benthological Society
SN - 2161-9565
IS - 1
ER -